<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson Tribute Ruined By BBC Commentators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/</link>
	<description>The Official Female First Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>SHAME  ON   THE  BBC COMMENTATORS. NOW WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE  R  E  A  L   L   Y   ABOUT. I&#039;m sick of giving your behavior anymore attention. DONE---- THIS IS R  FROM  UNITED STATES. Ugh !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHAME  ON   THE  BBC COMMENTATORS. NOW WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE  R  E  A  L   L   Y   ABOUT. I&#8217;m sick of giving your behavior anymore attention. DONE&#8212;- THIS IS R  FROM  UNITED STATES. Ugh !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinklady73</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinklady73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>I also agree that Trevor Nelson &amp; Paul Gambercini were V insensitive, firstly to his family &amp; secondly to all his fans.

Their comments seemed totally pointless &amp; as Trevor considers himself a big MJ fan he should of known better than to make cheap pointless remarks.

I wonder if they have both replayed the event &amp; realised how they  came across, or are they that arrogant that still have not realised ????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree that Trevor Nelson &amp; Paul Gambercini were V insensitive, firstly to his family &amp; secondly to all his fans.</p>
<p>Their comments seemed totally pointless &amp; as Trevor considers himself a big MJ fan he should of known better than to make cheap pointless remarks.</p>
<p>I wonder if they have both replayed the event &amp; realised how they  came across, or are they that arrogant that still have not realised ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish Thakrar</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Thakrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>May MJ Rest in Peace. May his Family be Blessed and Be Strong. Long live our memory of all the good brought to the world by MJ - the love, the knowledge of the suffering of the poor and the unfortunate, the kind words, the inspiration, the gentleness in such a harsh world . . .

The commentary was appalling and insulting and insensitive. I&#039;ve always had a lot of respect for the BBC as a professional and unbiased media service...but now my view is drastically changed. I should have watched the ceremony on Sky or CNN. I can&#039;t believe how Trevor and Paul used this as an entertainment show to make casual candid and trivial comments that were insensitive and disrespectful. The family were so considerate by letting us be part of their farewell to Michael, and I expect everyone - for once - to be polite and quiet if they had nothing good to say.

God Bless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May MJ Rest in Peace. May his Family be Blessed and Be Strong. Long live our memory of all the good brought to the world by MJ &#8211; the love, the knowledge of the suffering of the poor and the unfortunate, the kind words, the inspiration, the gentleness in such a harsh world . . .</p>
<p>The commentary was appalling and insulting and insensitive. I&#8217;ve always had a lot of respect for the BBC as a professional and unbiased media service&#8230;but now my view is drastically changed. I should have watched the ceremony on Sky or CNN. I can&#8217;t believe how Trevor and Paul used this as an entertainment show to make casual candid and trivial comments that were insensitive and disrespectful. The family were so considerate by letting us be part of their farewell to Michael, and I expect everyone &#8211; for once &#8211; to be polite and quiet if they had nothing good to say.</p>
<p>God Bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>I thought it was me being sensitive!  I thought Paul Gambercicini was awful!!  I could not believe what I was hearing he was so disrespectful.  I heard him at one point say something like &quot;thank goodness she&#039;s finished talking, now let&#039;s get back to the music&quot; like it was some kind of concert!  He had absolutely no respect for the occasion, the family of Michael Jackson or for the peope listening and watching.  He should never be allowed to do anything for the BBC again.  I for one will never listen to anything he has to say again and yes, I hope he in particuar is reprimanded by the BBC.  I felt that Trevor Nelson to his credit, did try and steer things, and sounded himself at times a litte taken aback by Paul Gambercini&#039;s comments...and I&#039;ve contacted the BBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was me being sensitive!  I thought Paul Gambercicini was awful!!  I could not believe what I was hearing he was so disrespectful.  I heard him at one point say something like &#8220;thank goodness she&#8217;s finished talking, now let&#8217;s get back to the music&#8221; like it was some kind of concert!  He had absolutely no respect for the occasion, the family of Michael Jackson or for the peope listening and watching.  He should never be allowed to do anything for the BBC again.  I for one will never listen to anything he has to say again and yes, I hope he in particuar is reprimanded by the BBC.  I felt that Trevor Nelson to his credit, did try and steer things, and sounded himself at times a litte taken aback by Paul Gambercini&#8217;s comments&#8230;and I&#8217;ve contacted the BBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eri</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Eri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>I WAS ABSOLUTLEY DISGUSTED. I felt so angry to the point of where i had to put my TV on mute except where the speeches &amp; performances were on. 
Paul Gambaccini&#039;s comment after Ushers performance of 
&quot;and usher has just caressed the mother&quot; was one of the comments forgotten....along with the MANY OTHERS. I heard BLATANT sniggering during two of the speeches. JUST AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WAS ABSOLUTLEY DISGUSTED. I felt so angry to the point of where i had to put my TV on mute except where the speeches &amp; performances were on.<br />
Paul Gambaccini&#8217;s comment after Ushers performance of<br />
&#8220;and usher has just caressed the mother&#8221; was one of the comments forgotten&#8230;.along with the MANY OTHERS. I heard BLATANT sniggering during two of the speeches. JUST AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>have written to BBC to complain, suggest you all do similar !!!
It was ruined by commentators&#039; crass comments (prob. trying to be anarchic, trendy + controversial ?) yawn .......zzzz........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have written to BBC to complain, suggest you all do similar !!!<br />
It was ruined by commentators&#8217; crass comments (prob. trying to be anarchic, trendy + controversial ?) yawn &#8230;&#8230;.zzzz&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shean</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>Shean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>im glad I didn&#039;t watch the bbc2 version. Why did they have people speaking for ? I watched it on Sky News who just let it run... no commentators... only people speaking were those giving speeches, singing... every-time someone came on there was a caption on the screen to say who it was. I don&#039;t think there was any need for commentators... why did we need to hear someone else views throughout the memorial ?, surely that should have been done at the end of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im glad I didn&#8217;t watch the bbc2 version. Why did they have people speaking for ? I watched it on Sky News who just let it run&#8230; no commentators&#8230; only people speaking were those giving speeches, singing&#8230; every-time someone came on there was a caption on the screen to say who it was. I don&#8217;t think there was any need for commentators&#8230; why did we need to hear someone else views throughout the memorial ?, surely that should have been done at the end of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>Hi, it&#039;s Rob here from comment 15.  just thought I&#039;d post the response I had from the BBC.  here you go:

Thanks for your e-mail regarding &#039;Michael Jackson Memorial&#039; broadcast on the 7 July.

We apologise if you were upset or unhappy with the commentary on the Michael Jackson Memorial event.  It certainly wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t our intention to come across as insensitive or disrespectful in any way and we very much regret if you felt this way.

Unfortunately, the BBC had no control over the event and very little information about its content right up until we went on air.  Even after the Memorial began, it proved highly unpredictable with unexpected and unexplained gaps in the event coverage. 

The commentators were, therefore, coping with an extremely challenging situation and striving to piece together as much information as possible for viewers.  WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re very sorry that in the midst of these difficult circumstances some of their comments appeared misjudged and inappropriate and we hope that this didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t detract too much from what was an extraordinarily moving Memorial service. 

Both Trevor Nelson and Paul Gambaccini are huge fans of Michael JacksonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s music and have enormous respect for the legacy he has created.

We&#039;d like to assure you that we&#039;ve registered your comments on our audience log. This is the internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers and commissioning executives within the BBC, and also their senior management. It ensures that your points, and all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.

Thanks again for taking the time to contact us with your concerns.

Regards
 
BBC Complaints</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it&#8217;s Rob here from comment 15.  just thought I&#8217;d post the response I had from the BBC.  here you go:</p>
<p>Thanks for your e-mail regarding &#8216;Michael Jackson Memorial&#8217; broadcast on the 7 July.</p>
<p>We apologise if you were upset or unhappy with the commentary on the Michael Jackson Memorial event.  It certainly wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t our intention to come across as insensitive or disrespectful in any way and we very much regret if you felt this way.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the BBC had no control over the event and very little information about its content right up until we went on air.  Even after the Memorial began, it proved highly unpredictable with unexpected and unexplained gaps in the event coverage. </p>
<p>The commentators were, therefore, coping with an extremely challenging situation and striving to piece together as much information as possible for viewers.  WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re very sorry that in the midst of these difficult circumstances some of their comments appeared misjudged and inappropriate and we hope that this didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t detract too much from what was an extraordinarily moving Memorial service. </p>
<p>Both Trevor Nelson and Paul Gambaccini are huge fans of Michael JacksonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s music and have enormous respect for the legacy he has created.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d like to assure you that we&#8217;ve registered your comments on our audience log. This is the internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers and commissioning executives within the BBC, and also their senior management. It ensures that your points, and all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.</p>
<p>Thanks again for taking the time to contact us with your concerns.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>BBC Complaints</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>I thought it was awful and couldn&#039;t believe my ears when I heard their comments.  I today wrote to the BBC and complained and received the following statement - within 1 hour of sending it.  I then came accross this forum - I hadn&#039;t realised that others too were so offended by them.  I&#039;m not a massive fan but was appaulled at what I was hearing.
&quot;hanks for your e-mail regarding &#039;Michael Jackson Memorial&#039; broadcast on the 7 July.

We apologise if you were upset or unhappy with the commentary on the Michael Jackson Memorial event.  It certainly wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t our intention to come across as insensitive or disrespectful in any way and we very much regret if you felt this way.

Unfortunately, the BBC had no control over the event and very little information about its content right up until we went on air.  Even after the Memorial began, it proved highly unpredictable with unexpected and unexplained gaps in the event coverage. 

The commentators were, therefore, coping with an extremely challenging situation and striving to piece together as much information as possible for viewers.  WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re very sorry that in the midst of these difficult circumstances some of their comments appeared misjudged and inappropriate and we hope that this didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t detract too much from what was an extraordinarily moving Memorial service. 

Both Trevor Nelson and Paul Gambaccini are huge fans of Michael JacksonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s music and have enormous respect for the legacy he has created.

We&#039;d like to assure you that we&#039;ve registered your comments on our audience log. This is the internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers and commissioning executives within the BBC, and also their senior management. It ensures that your points, and all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.

Thanks again for taking the time to contact us with your concerns.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was awful and couldn&#8217;t believe my ears when I heard their comments.  I today wrote to the BBC and complained and received the following statement &#8211; within 1 hour of sending it.  I then came accross this forum &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t realised that others too were so offended by them.  I&#8217;m not a massive fan but was appaulled at what I was hearing.<br />
&#8220;hanks for your e-mail regarding &#8216;Michael Jackson Memorial&#8217; broadcast on the 7 July.</p>
<p>We apologise if you were upset or unhappy with the commentary on the Michael Jackson Memorial event.  It certainly wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t our intention to come across as insensitive or disrespectful in any way and we very much regret if you felt this way.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the BBC had no control over the event and very little information about its content right up until we went on air.  Even after the Memorial began, it proved highly unpredictable with unexpected and unexplained gaps in the event coverage. </p>
<p>The commentators were, therefore, coping with an extremely challenging situation and striving to piece together as much information as possible for viewers.  WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re very sorry that in the midst of these difficult circumstances some of their comments appeared misjudged and inappropriate and we hope that this didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t detract too much from what was an extraordinarily moving Memorial service. </p>
<p>Both Trevor Nelson and Paul Gambaccini are huge fans of Michael JacksonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s music and have enormous respect for the legacy he has created.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d like to assure you that we&#8217;ve registered your comments on our audience log. This is the internal report of audience feedback which we compile daily for all programme makers and commissioning executives within the BBC, and also their senior management. It ensures that your points, and all other comments we receive, are circulated and considered across the BBC.</p>
<p>Thanks again for taking the time to contact us with your concerns.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauline Y</title>
		<link>http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson-tribute-ruined-by-bbc-commentators-1768/comment-page-2/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauline Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/blog/?p=1768#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>People, please, get a grip!  Banter or not, tribute or not, it was so boring that I turned off - a memorial (isn&#039;t that like a wake?) is supposed to be a celebration of life, not the sombre affair of a funeral! I liked Michael Jackson&#039;s music, but let&#039;s not get carried away here, wasn&#039;t it just a few years ago that he was condemned by the majority for his behaviour with children?

As for calling him the most influential performer of all time - NO WAY!  This has almost got to the &#039;godlike, idol&#039; adulation that the death of Diana had on people and, for me, this is not healthy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People, please, get a grip!  Banter or not, tribute or not, it was so boring that I turned off &#8211; a memorial (isn&#8217;t that like a wake?) is supposed to be a celebration of life, not the sombre affair of a funeral! I liked Michael Jackson&#8217;s music, but let&#8217;s not get carried away here, wasn&#8217;t it just a few years ago that he was condemned by the majority for his behaviour with children?</p>
<p>As for calling him the most influential performer of all time &#8211; NO WAY!  This has almost got to the &#8216;godlike, idol&#8217; adulation that the death of Diana had on people and, for me, this is not healthy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

