Abortion

by **Bobin** » Thu May 08, 2008 9:12 pm

The Colonel wrote:
Looks like we have another homophobe on the forum.

just call me the professor of logic.

btw, your conclusion cannot be drawn from my post you quoted.

by **Fred75** » Thu May 08, 2008 9:17 pm

Bobin wrote:Fred,

so then, it is biology, and not religion, that determines the normal biological function of the penis and vagina ?

in other words, it is religion that follows and agrees with biological function, not the other way around. would you agree?

God designed the vagina for the penis.

by **Bobin** » Thu May 08, 2008 9:33 pm

Fred75 wrote:
God designed the vagina for the penis.

the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.

by **Fred75** » Thu May 08, 2008 9:40 pm

Bobin wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
God designed the vagina for the penis.

the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.

Correct.

by **Bobin** » Thu May 08, 2008 9:42 pm

well. that settles it then. logic wins again.

by **Sharon den Adel** » Fri May 09, 2008 2:58 am

Fred75 wrote:
Bobin wrote:Fred,

so then, it is biology, and not religion, that determines the normal biological function of the penis and vagina ?

in other words, it is religion that follows and agrees with biological function, not the other way around. would you agree?

God designed the vagina for the penis.

Did he tell you that?

by **Cambridge** » Fri May 09, 2008 3:49 am

No, I believe he designed the penis for the vagina. Which came first, the chicken, the egg or fred?

by **Fred75** » Fri May 09, 2008 1:58 pm

Cambridge wrote:No, I believe he designed the penis for the vagina. Which came first, the chicken, the egg or fred?

I always come first! :lol:

by **The Colonel** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:16 pm

Cambridge wrote:No, I believe he designed the penis for the vagina. Which came first, the chicken, the egg or fred?

There is no direct evidence of that. While that certainly is one use, who is to say there are not others?

End of.

by **Fred75** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:30 pm

The Colonel wrote:
Cambridge wrote:No, I believe he designed the penis for the vagina. Which came first, the chicken, the egg or fred?

There is no direct evidence of that. While that certainly is one use, who is to say there are not others?

End of.

No direct evidence that the vagina was made for sex and the penis???

How about the vagina lubricates itself in a normal woman during sex and your S*** hole doesn't!

by **The Colonel** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:33 pm

Fred75 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Cambridge wrote:No, I believe he designed the penis for the vagina. Which came first, the chicken, the egg or fred?

There is no direct evidence of that. While that certainly is one use, who is to say there are not others?

End of.

No direct evidence that the vagina was made for sex and the penis???

How about the vagina lubricates itself in a normal woman during sex and your S*** hole doesn't!

One is for pro-creation, the other may well be just for fun.

Have you never had Anal sex with your wife Fred?

by **Fred75** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:38 pm

The Colonel wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Cambridge wrote:No, I believe he designed the penis for the vagina. Which came first, the chicken, the egg or fred?

There is no direct evidence of that. While that certainly is one use, who is to say there are not others?

End of.

No direct evidence that the vagina was made for sex and the penis???

How about the vagina lubricates itself in a normal woman during sex and your S*** hole doesn't!

One is for pro-creation, the other may well be just for fun.

Have you never had Anal sex with your wife Fred?

So then... WHO'S C*** is your ass for?

by **ZiaAries** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:38 pm

Fred, I know you won't answer this but, I'm curious just the same. What about the tongue and mouth. Do you think that our mouths were or were not designed/meant to pleasure our spouse's genitals?

by **Fred75** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:42 pm

ZiaAries wrote:Fred, I know you won't answer this but, I'm curious just the same. What about the tongue and mouth. Do you think that our mouths were or were not designed/meant to pleasure our spouse's genitals?

let's just take this debate to it's logical conclusion of just what's NOT a C*** good for?

Farm animals?

because in my opinion... If one man can F*** another mans arse because it can take it... Who the hell are you to chastise someone that does goats?

by **Fred75** » Fri May 09, 2008 8:45 pm

ZiaAries wrote:Fred, I know you won't answer this but, I'm curious just the same. What about the tongue and mouth. Do you think that our mouths were or were not designed/meant to pleasure our spouse's genitals?

The vagina self lubricates.
The mouth can too.

Show me where the ass self lubricates without having the squirts?

Abortion

Who is online