Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:
God designed the vagina for the penis.
the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.
Your argument fails.
There is no creator until proven such.
Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:
God designed the vagina for the penis.
the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.
thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. you are probably correct in your philosophical assessment --- i clearly see now after reading your post, that the mouth also eliminates the waste of the brain and, in the process, spews out S*** in all directions, as your comments directed at me personally clearly indicate.
and for what it's worth, if you want to know anything about me, go read the health forum on this site. the only reason i even participate here is to answer questions anyone who has a health related issue, particularily teens who are sometimes hesitant to talk to their parents or a doctor.
Bobin wrote:Cambridge wrote:Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.
sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.
Cambridge wrote:Bobin wrote:Cambridge wrote:Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.
sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.
Just make sure they are physiological questions, and not questions that demand thought.
Cambridge wrote:Bobin wrote:Cambridge wrote:Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.
sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.
Just make sure they are physiological questions, and not questions that demand thought.
The Colonel wrote:Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:
God designed the vagina for the penis.
the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.
Your argument fails.
There is no creator until proven such.
Bobin wrote:The Colonel wrote:Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:
God designed the vagina for the penis.
the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.
Your argument fails.
There is no creator until proven such.
Crííost an Sláánaitheoir Fééin
Bobin wrote:Cambridge wrote:biologically, it doesn't. the anus is for elimination of waste.
the vagina has two purposes. sex and delivering a baby.
the mouth is for kissing. there's not much of a limit to what can be kissed or how it can be kissed.
Once again, hairy back, you make a lot of silly assumptions. Have you communed with mother nature? How do you know what organs are for what purpose?
You are committing what is known as the essentialist fallacy, that anything in reproduction happens for the sake of the species rather than for the sake of the would-be propagator’s genes. How do you know these functions are for the species? Who told you this?
You are also committing the teleological fallacy, that anything in evolution is pulled toward a goal rather than pushed by the past. You pose “elimination” and “sex and delivering babies” and “kissing” as the final purpose of these physiological features. Who told you this and how is s/he related to whatever deity you invoke for this.
Finally, you are committing the normative fallacy…that concepts such as ‘good, better, and best’ have a role to play in evolution anymore than they have in physics or chemistry. You seem to imply that it is better to use the tongue for tasting tea, or the anus for elimination, and the vagina for the strict purposes that your deity designates: “sex and delivering a baby.”
As always, ignorance, my ignorant fool. I am pissed that I have to explain this s*** to you. If you violate any of these fallacies again, I am going to send you a f***ing bill, idiot.
thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. you are probably correct in your philosophical assessment --- i clearly see now after reading your post, that the mouth also eliminates the waste of the brain and, in the process, spews out S*** in all directions,

Cambridge wrote:biologically, it doesn't. the anus is for elimination of waste.
the vagina has two purposes. sex and delivering a baby.
the mouth is for kissing. there's not much of a limit to what can be kissed or how it can be kissed.
Once again, hairy back, you make a lot of silly assumptions. Have you communed with mother nature? How do you know what organs are for what purpose?
You are committing what is known as the essentialist fallacy, that anything in reproduction happens for the sake of the species rather than for the sake of the would-be propagator’s genes. How do you know these functions are for the species? Who told you this?
You are also committing the teleological fallacy, that anything in evolution is pulled toward a goal rather than pushed by the past. You pose “elimination” and “sex and delivering babies” and “kissing” as the final purpose of these physiological features. Who told you this and how is s/he related to whatever deity you invoke for this.
Finally, you are committing the normative fallacy…that concepts such as ‘good, better, and best’ have a role to play in evolution anymore than they have in physics or chemistry. You seem to imply that it is better to use the tongue for tasting tea, or the anus for elimination, and the vagina for the strict purposes that your deity designates: “sex and delivering a baby.”
As always, ignorance, my ignorant fool. I am pissed that I have to explain this s*** to you. If you violate any of these fallacies again, I am going to send you a f***ing bill, idiot.
Return to Politics And Social Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests