LOL! National Ledger SLAMS the loons!

[Guest]

Given the loons attack Jen Uma and Laura, they make it easy for magazines to make money by hating on these celebs.

Only US mag seems to want to cash in on the hatred game though.

[Guest]

LOL!

The loons do not know more than Forbes magazine. They didn't take the time along with the haters, Jen Hags and apparently the media to actually read the Forbes article and small print.

The problems lies in shoddy reporting. Jennifer Aniston did not make more money than Jolie in 2007. Jennifer Aniston made more money from June 2007 through June 2008. ABSOLUTELY. 4 movie to 1 movie ratio.

All of these magazines, web sites and blogs are quoting Forbes incorrectly. The salary date range they pulled was from June 2007 to June 2008. See the small print..

"Earnings estimates are for June 2007 - June 2008. We included income from endorsements, movies or other ventures only if the celebrity has been paid, applying the same rules to entertainment-related ventures."

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/53/celebrities08_Jennifer-Aniston_PSEY.html

Jen made 4 movies equaling 27 mil. 6.7 mil per film average.

Angelina made 1 movie (the Changeling) equaling 14 mil.

Jen made more movies and therefore made more money. Jolie was busy being pregnant with twins, taking care of 4 other children, going to Iraq to spotlight refugees needs, attending premieres and award shows for films she had been nominated in a category for.

Jolie at this point still makes more per picture. Jen is a bargain as they also pointed out in The Ultimate Star Payback.

Jen will also make more money next year as well since Jolie is taking time off for her family.

So Forbes is correct. Shoddy reporting makes the statement false.

[Guest]

Jolie might get fired from her next flick due to "weight issues" (read, "drug use"). Word got out from the set of Wanted how drugged she was during filming, so no one wants to touch her now.

[Guest]

LMAO
Poor loons don't know what PAYBACK means. LOL
Jolie is not even on top 10, which means she doesn't give back money, she's not worth! LOLOL

[Guest]

Crazy loons can't hide anymore

[You're So Vein]

Loons call anything they don't like a lie.

Angie is now going to find herself about as employable as Lindsey Lohan. Not only did nobody want to work with the cracked out drama queen, but they couldn't get her insured any more! She is too much of a liability. Once they can no longer find an underwriter to insure you, affordably or at all, (say, oh because you were so doped during your last filming that you kept passing out cold on the set), you're DONE.

[Guest]

That's a compliment to us, you walking TITS!

DAMN YOU GUYS ARE DUMB DUMB DUMB
WE HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL LONG THAT THE HATE FOR ANGELINA IS ALL BECAUSE OF JENNIFER ANISTONS' W**nking FANS.

INFACT I DON'T THINK ANISTON HAS FANS. JUST A BUNCH OF LOSERS WHO LOST A GUY TO A GREAT GAL LIKE ANGELINA AND NOW ARE TOO OLD FOR A LIFE AND JEOLOUS.

ANISTON HAS SIMPLY BECOME A SOUNDING BOARD FOR SCORNED WOMAN.

ANY ANISTON FANS LIKE ANISTON FOR HER AND NOT FOR HER PASS. ....................................................DIDN'T THINK SO.

OH MY MY. THIS IS SOOOOOOOOOOO SAD

Poor poor loon you will never change, you will never learn, you will never evolve. You think the whole world is wrong and you are right.

Aniston sounding board for scorned women? Baby first of all many people here are not Aniston fans. Those who are like me for example are not scorned women. Quite the contrary. I was never cheated on as far as I know or was scorned, but I also treat other women with respect. Never went for someone else's boyfriend even though there were ''offers'', never tried to destroy some other woman's life, family or relationship. For me Aniston is not a moral soundboard for anything, I look for that in real people in my life, but yes I still think she handled things with dignity and class and if I ever became a scorned woman I would only wish to follow her steps.

Now baby let's get to the real issue. You love love love Jolie because she gave an excuse for YOUR BEHAVIOUR, Jolie told women like you it is okay to cheat, have a baby to trap a married man, and destroy other women's lifes. AND YOU FEEL ANGRY THAT THE WORLD IS NOT AGREEING WITH HER. So tell us? How long since the day your lover went back to her wife? Or how long since your father went back to his wife and other children?

[Guest]

Bump for the ignorant loons

[Guest]

Slam dunk

[Guest]

LOL

[Guest]

Bump.

[Guest]

So now the mags don't just slam Brangelina, they slam the fans of Brangelina
And yet the loons are convinced that they are the majority and that its the haters that everyone makes fun of.

[Guest]

LOL!

The loons do not know more than Forbes magazine. They didn't take the time along with the haters, Jen Hags and apparently the media to actually read the Forbes article and small print.

The problems lies in shoddy reporting. Jennifer Aniston did not make more money than Jolie in 2007. Jennifer Aniston made more money from June 2007 through June 2008. ABSOLUTELY. 4 movie to 1 movie ratio.

All of these magazines, web sites and blogs are quoting Forbes incorrectly. The salary date range they pulled was from June 2007 to June 2008. See the small print..

"Earnings estimates are for June 2007 - June 2008. We included income from endorsements, movies or other ventures only if the celebrity has been paid, applying the same rules to entertainment-related ventures."

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/53/celebrities08_Jennifer-Aniston_PSEY.html

Jen made 4 movies equaling 27 mil. 6.7 mil per film average.

Angelina made 1 movie (the Changeling) equaling 14 mil.

Jen made more movies and therefore made more money. Jolie was busy being pregnant with twins, taking care of 4 other children, going to Iraq to spotlight refugees needs, attending premieres and award shows for films she had been nominated in a category for.

Jolie at this point still makes more per picture. Jen is a bargain as they also pointed out in The Ultimate Star Payback.

Jen will also make more money next year as well since Jolie is taking time off for her family.

So Forbes is correct. Shoddy reporting makes the statement false.

Doesn't change the fact that Aniston made the studios more money than Angelina. Aniston is in the top 10 (women and men) Angie comes in at 14.

[Guest]

Jennifer Aniston Doubles Down on Angelina Jolie
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Mary Browning
Jul 24, 2008


This won't make fans of Angelina Jolie very happy. The actress slash baby mama didn't do very well when pitted against rival Jennifer Aniston when it comes to bringing home the bacon according to a report from Forbes. Fortunately for Jolie and her rabid fans she should come out ahead this year as she will reportedly make a good fortune off the photos of her new twins.


A report from Us Weekly notes that while Jennifer, 39 was pulling in a whopping $27 million in 2007; Jolie, 33 came in at just above half that amount and delivered $14 million to the Jolie-Pitt family coffers. Basically, the Forbes report details that Aniston doubled Jolie earnings in 2007. If the twins have a really good run they might out earn Jolie this year as their photos are said to be worth somewhere north of ten million bucks.



One can only wonder if Jennifer Aniston does have a child soon how much the photos would be worth of that baby and would Aniston follow the leader and sell the photos or would she make a stand like Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban and refuse to put the baby pictures up for sale.

The report by Us Weekly citing the Forbes numbers has brought a very heated discussion here where it appears that Jolie fans are convinced that they know more about money than Forbes Magazine.

http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272621723.shtml

I love how they don't even play the game of pretending this money is going to charity. They know it's going into her bank account.