Fred75 wrote:Ivan Diederhoff wrote:Boingo, Zia do you want to know why Moore's films are so good? Because they are getting you talking about the issue(s) like adults. No arguments, no flaming, just proper discussion. Every film has one thing in common, the director's point of view. A director is trying to make a statement in his/her work. You may not agree with his points, but you are talking about it.
It's like the old saying, "there's no such thing as bad press as long as they spell your name right!"
No.
Moores view shows only his liberal agenda.
He's all about hating America and it's government.
You can be sure of one thing... after he gets his way with socialized medicine you wont catch him dead in a state run hospital!
Aww, Fred, once again, you left out the word "castrated" before Liberal!
You say he only points out his liberal agenda, do you think a conservative film maker would put a heavy dose of liberal point of view in their film when they are trying to make a conservative point? That's why I said a director is trying to send a message in their films. I had a look at "Bowling For Columbine" and while what happened there makes me sad and sick, I am NOT going to give up the weapons I own. I believe in the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms. It was the everyday citizen that took up arms to fight for independence in 1776. They were organized into militia and fighters by Washington and French military advisors who wanted to see Britain ousted. Now most liberals would say guns have no place in the home, yet I will not give them up. Please do spare me the "liberal" hate if you aren't going to add the comedy relief of "castrated" in the statement, OK?
