Better start teaching the Koran to your kids!

[Colonel Angus]

A challenge...? I don't consider yourself a worthy opponent.

So what's a worthy opponent in your opinion? Someone who agrees with you? That's an "opponent"? Do you even know what the word "opponent" means?

Never fall for the left's practice of changing the subject at hand.
They get you into debates, like this, in which there is no real winner.

Havent you ever watched Hannity or O'Rielly?... that's a the leftists do... change the subject!

[Stalfos]

A challenge...? I don't consider yourself a worthy opponent.

So what's a worthy opponent in your opinion? Someone who agrees with you? That's an "opponent"? Do you even know what the word "opponent" means?

Never fall for the left's practice of changing the subject at hand.
They get you into debates, like this, in which there is no real winner.

Havent you ever watched Hannity or O'Rielly?... that's a the leftists do... change the subject!

I know what he is doing. I'm playing along. Trust me, he can't win. He will end up doing what the Colonel has done: donging the entire thread. I'm their worst nightmare. I will continue to shove the truth up their asses until they get so badly raped that they will start getting seizures (like Cambridge is getting lately). I have debated way better and more intelligent people than him and I have always won. Chairman and the Colonel are typical inferior vermin of the left, nothing special about them. Don't worry.

[The Chairman]

...

[Stalfos]

A challenge...? I don't consider yourself a worthy opponent.

So what's a worthy opponent in your opinion? Someone who agrees with you? That's an "opponent"? Do you even know what the word "opponent" means?

Never fall for the left's practice of changing the subject at hand.
They get you into debates, like this, in which there is no real winner.

Havent you ever watched Hannity or O'Rielly?... that's a the leftists do... change the subject!

I know what he is doing. I'm playing along. Trust me, he can't win. He will end up doing what the Colonel has done: donging the entire thread. I'm their worst nightmare. I will continue to shove the truth up their asses until they get so badly raped that they will start getting seizures (like Cambridge is getting lately). I have debated way better and more intelligent people than him and I have always won. Chairman and the Colonel are typical inferior vermin of the left, nothing special about them. Don't worry.

Am I supposed to be scared or something..?

Have I threatened you?

I know you are dogging my question. So let's not forget what I have asked you:

So what's a worthy opponent in your opinion? Someone who agrees with you? That's an "opponent"? Do you even know what the word "opponent" means?

[The Chairman]

...

[Colonel Angus]

I know what he is doing. I'm playing along. Trust me, he can't win.

But he is.
For Liberals, winning comes by evasion. You may think you are winning but you are losing the battle because you are now playing by his and other Liberals rules.

You want to win?
Don't play their game.
Re-post ONLY what they ignored and passed over.


Ever watch Star Trek the Next Generation?
There was an episode in which Data could not beat an alien at a "video" game.
To make a long story short... at the end Data played not to win... but not to let the other win!
This strategy made the other stomp off because of the futility.
Don't fall to DATA's and the Liberals strategy!

Post your winning point over and over again and do not play their game of distraction!

[Stalfos]

I know you are dogging my question. So let's not forget what I have asked you:

So what's a worthy opponent in your opinion? Someone who agrees with you? That's an "opponent"? Do you even know what the word "opponent" means?

A worthy opponent in my opinion is someone who has a record on this website. You just spam the forum with lengthy posts and ram your point of view down peoples throat. As for dogging you , I dodge no-one.

Oh it's an "opinion", so why does it have to enforced?

Who decides who has a record in this website? You?

[Stalfos]

I know what he is doing. I'm playing along. Trust me, he can't win.

But he is.
For Liberals, winning comes by evasion. You may think you are winning but you are losing the battle because you are now playing by his and other Liberals rules.

You want to win?
Don't play their game.
Re-post ONLY what they ignored and passed over.


Ever watch Star Trek the Next Generation?
There was an episode in which Data could not beat an alien at a "video" game.
To make a long story short... at the end Data played not to win... but not to let the other win!
This strategy made the other stomp off because of the futility.
Don't fall to DATA's and the Liberals strategy!

Post your winning point over and over again and do not play their game of distraction!

Exactly!

[The Chairman]

...

[Colonel Angus]

I know what he is doing. I'm playing along. Trust me, he can't win.

But he is.
For Liberals, winning comes by evasion. You may think you are winning but you are losing the battle because you are now playing by his and other Liberals rules.

You want to win?
Don't play their game.
Re-post ONLY what they ignored and passed over.


Ever watch Star Trek the Next Generation?
There was an episode in which Data could not beat an alien at a "video" game.
To make a long story short... at the end Data played not to win... but not to let the other win!
This strategy made the other stomp off because of the futility.
Don't fall to DATA's and the Liberals strategy!

Post your winning point over and over again and do not play their game of distraction!

Exactly!

So much so you are blinded and have lost the true point of my post.

[Stalfos]

I know you are dogging my question. So let's not forget what I have asked you:

So what's a worthy opponent in your opinion? Someone who agrees with you? That's an "opponent"? Do you even know what the word "opponent" means?

A worthy opponent in my opinion is someone who has a record on this website. You just spam the forum with lengthy posts and ram your point of view down peoples throat. As for dogging you , I dodge no-one.

Oh it's an "opinion", so why does it have to enforced?

Who decides who has a record in this website? You?

If you want me as an opponent...yes

Well then, it is now established that you are an authoritarian.

An OPPONENT has OPPOSING views. Thus, if you decide with whom you are going to debate and ignore others and dodge their arguments, you don't respect OPPOSING views. In other words, you are an authoritarian.

Great work letting me know where you truly stand with politics.

[Stalfos]

So much so you are blinded and have lost the true point of my post.

Hmmm, no, you have failed to understand me, instead.

[The Chairman]

...

[The Colonel]

ROFL!!!!!! The Colonel has just left the thread. It's too much for him. LOL, just scroll up everybody and enjoy and see how the Colonel is trying to dodge my post.

Don't flatter yourself , this forum does not circle around you.....

Have I said that the forum should circle around me or anything like that? Are you dictating to me what I should do? Does the forum circle around you? Defending Colonel's dodging attempts?

Chairman, among others, has seen me write extensively on the Crown, Parliament, laws, the military and so on.

I am not repeating myself to a scumbag who doesn't know anything.

The power of the Crown doesn't need explaining to a British person. You see it in all it's majesty.

I will be kind though, this time, have a watch of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaVrWViIQXA

It doesn't give direct answers to your questions, but if you don't "get it" by the end of the video then there is little point in explaining further.

Watch it all, but focus after 5:20.

Bear in mind I am a retired Colonel myself.

[Stalfos]

ROFL!!!!!! The Colonel has just left the thread. It's too much for him. LOL, just scroll up everybody and enjoy and see how the Colonel is trying to dodge my post.

Don't flatter yourself , this forum does not circle around you.....

Have I said that the forum should circle around me or anything like that? Are you dictating to me what I should do? Does the forum circle around you? Defending Colonel's dodging attempts?

Chairman, among others, has seen me write extensively on the Crown, Parliament, laws, the military and so on.

I am not repeating myself to a scumbag who doesn't know anything.

The power of the Crown doesn't need explaining to a British person. You see it in all it's majesty.

I will be kind though, this time, have a watch of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaVrWViIQXA

It doesn't give direct answers to your questions, but if you don't "get it" by the end of the video then there is little point in explaining further.

Watch it all, but focus after 5:20.

Bear in mind I am a retired Colonel myself.

One excuse after another. I'm not questioning the power of the Crown. I'm questioning monarchism and exposing the UK to be a failure in terms of politics, among others. I'm not discussing what the monarchy in Britain is, I'm discussing what the British monarchy is from a perspective of monarchism. You are bending my words to dodge my post.

Thread: Better start teaching the Koran to your kids!

I will defend the Crown.

My reply to that which you have been dodging:

First of all, a monarchism is wrong and that's putting it lightly. Monarchism is nepotism. It favors people from a particular family because they are from that family. That's 100% wrong because if you are talented in doing something, that doesn't mean that your children will be equally talented. Talent and intelligence is not being passed down from one generation to another. It can have influence, but it is not being passed down from one generation to another. That's a scientific fact. Thus, monarchism, like anything else that is nepotism, is wrong and makes no sense. It's dangerous to give someone without having any intelligence or talents so much power. The queen or king may have the IQ of a mentally retarded person and still be given such powers. That's insane.

Secondly, monarchism is also oligarchism, which means that monarchy is the "rule of a few". Only a particular group of people is given certain ruling rights. That is always wrong. Collectivism and oligarchism can only lead and operate under a big government. By default, an oligarchy is a form of autocracy. Thus, a type of dictatorship because only a few are in charge. The government must be small and serve only to protect its people. Nothing more, nothing less. Anything more than a small government means automatically that there will be less individual rights and freedoms.

With that said, it is no surprise that the UK has no freedoms or individual rights. There is no such a thing as the First Amendment in the UK, like there is in the USA. The UK law is crap and makes no sense. That's why Jacqui Smit is able to r**** freedom of speech in the UK. Nobody can sue her because the UK law guarantees no freedom of speech. The UK had adopted the EU constitution crap on freedom of speech but that's good enough for the UK, it offers too much freedom. Thus, the UK has imposed a number of addition restrictions on free speech, which literally put religion ABOVE the freedom of speech. UK laws on freedom of speech are without a doubt the worst in the West. Contrary to what you claim, the UK is not civilized. A civilized country guarantees individual rights and freedoms to its people. The UK does not do so.

You have recently posted a message containing verses from the Bible, in order to proof it violent and whatnot. So under the "free speech" laws of the UK, you can be persecuted. That's right. Go on most defending your noble and sovereign lady and lords, while you violate their laws. THEY PUT UNPROVEN CLAIMS ABOVE THE HUMAN RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

Even worse, the UK is in DEFENSE of Muslims. The UK is full of Muslims. Islam has only one goal in the UK: the overthrow of the UK government. Islam instructs its followers to overthrow all constitutions and states in favor of an Islamic state and the Shariah law (which sentences people to beheadings and amputations). But you are not allows to criticize them because you have a piece of S*** law and no freedom of speech in your "civilized" country. According to the law of the UK, you are worse than the Muslims.

The UK is a disgusting country with disgusting laws. It's a dictatorship run (literally) by retards. No individual rights, no freedoms.

Admit defeat or defend your arguments