boys wearing skirts

by **Guest** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:08 am

There is no such thing as 'sociological fact' being as sociology is not a hard science but a made up 'social science' by and for people with insufficient aptitude to grapple with real science.

by **The Colonel** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 8:51 am

. wrote:There is no such thing as 'sociological fact' being as sociology is not a hard science but a made up 'social science' by and for people with insufficient aptitude to grapple with real science.

Wrong.

by **Guest** » Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:55 am

The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:There is no such thing as 'sociological fact' being as sociology is not a hard science but a made up 'social science' by and for people with insufficient aptitude to grapple with real science.

Wrong.

that one word put me in my place.....arsehole.. :roll:

by **k daviers** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:06 am

get him a a skirt from the shop and nappy

by **The Colonel** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 2:22 pm

Hello McMum!

by **Guest** » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:14 pm

i thought you said you 'got McMum banned'... :roll:

by **The Colonel** » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:35 pm

I did

I use it as an insult now.

Nobody likes being referred to as the pervert mother who wears nappies, dresses up as a baby and enforces her children to do the same.

by **Guest** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:16 am

Is McMum AD/DL then?

by **Guest** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:17 am

. wrote:Is McMum AD/DL then?

I meant AB/DL.

by **The Colonel** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:37 pm

. wrote:
. wrote:Is McMum AD/DL then?

I meant AB/DL.

Yes although she denied it.

It was clear from what she was saying.

by **Guest** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:35 pm

The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:Is McMum AD/DL then?

I meant AB/DL.

Yes although she denied it.

It was clear from what she was saying.

If she wears nappies only because it turns her on and if she forces her young child to wear nappies only because it turns her on and the child does not need to wear nappies, then she is a wacko.

by **The Colonel** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:02 pm

. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:Is McMum AD/DL then?

I meant AB/DL.

Yes although she denied it.

It was clear from what she was saying.

If she wears nappies only because it turns her on and if she forces her young child to wear nappies only because it turns her on and the child does not need to wear nappies, then she is a wacko.