can a man be a feminist?

Are women a mystery to you? Post your thoughts here.

Moderator: Silent One

User avatar
x-xcutiex-x
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1804
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:02 pm

Re: can a man be a feminist?

Postby x-xcutiex-x on Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:35 pm

goodguy wrote:As a young boy I often fantisized of being superman and coming to the rescue of my mother who suffered (in mind, body and spirit) and the hands of my father who was nothing short of a tyrant (it's a very long story) but I said that to say this: As a defender of my mother, brother of three sisters, best friend to my wife, father of five daughters, I just have to say that I despise a chauvinist man, I despise a woman beater, control freaks and playboy wannabe's (womanizer) while on the other hand I also despise the spinless, gutless, the selfish, needy, jealous and insecure man. It's my opinion that a lot of men (if not most) have no business being in a relationship with a woman. I will teach my daughters to strive for higher education, self reliance and being independant (in need of no man), to have self respect (to love who and what they are). I will teach them that men are just accessories to be discarded if they don't match or measure up. I pity the fool who gets in the way. My gosh! am I a feminist?


You made me cry, your the perfect father, husbad and son, id give anything to be associated with at least on of these as a permermant part of my life. It all starts with the father and id do anyhting to have a dad just like you well done :D xx

User avatar
x-xcutiex-x
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1804
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:02 pm

Postby x-xcutiex-x on Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:42 pm

Lena wrote:I think men should respect women and there should be equality . Then again one of the most boring men I ever met was some college teacher who tried to be a male femanist . Kept trying to say he wasn't a sexist , talked all about how he was a femanist , how bad male chauvanists are , called history in schools herstory and , said women should be allowed to fight in the army . At first I thought he was just trying to be slick to get laid or gay . Then I realized he was a dizzy idiot butting into what is really a woman's issue to sound cool and enlightened. Who wants a guy like that ?


not all guys are like that, iv learnt that there is not fun in being with a guy who takes girls for granted. they only seem fun because you are constantly wondering if they like you or not, then the prize seems to be having time with them, you feel worthless. there is something so beautifull and fun about being relaxed and comfortable with a guy who will always treat you with respect, and be there for you. they dont have to be a feminist to be a nice guy. but yes some guys can be a little mad with the feminist issue, however, id always pick the kind guy now, i blame my dad and my mums relationship, women lower type of thing, its not true guys can love you as equal and you make yourself less equal by letting a guy get to you. ohh sorry iv go off at a tangent lol :lol:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:30 am

antifeminist wrote:
On March 10, an event titled "Patriarchy Slam" was held by the radical Feminist Action League in a room reserved by a second and recognized student group. (The significance of this is that the free room was used in violation of UNH policy.) Posters across the campus advertised the meeting as a public event, with no indication of "Women Only."

Patriarchy Slam expressed radical anti-male feminism. For example, some FAL members wore scissors around their necks as they sang in praise of castration. One member, who identified herself as Mary Man-Hating-Is-Fun, told the gathering, "Ever since I learned to embrace my feminist nature, I found great joy in threatening men's lives...because I see them for what they are: misogynistic, sexist, oppressive and absurdly pathetic beings who only serve to pollute and contaminate this world..."

...



This reminds me of a similar incident that took place at a major Ivy League university a while back. A group of radical female students declaring themselves feminists held unofficial meetings around campus and would sing very sexist, anti-male songs. Administration did nothing until these students were promoting the notion of "forced lesbianism." This belief was premised that women needed to be "rescued" from heterosexuality and once a woman experienced gay sex she'd never go back to a man. This included the use of throwing so-called "pussy sniffers" at women: tampons that were worn by the women and had a rubber band stappled on either end so as to allow the tampon to be worn under the nose of the wearer. Finally, the administration band the group and expelled several of the members.

You can't make this sh*t up.

Stupid bitches everywhere, but I would not think they were feminists. They are the the female equivlent of Muslim terrorists who've hijacked Islam and claim their cause is santctioned in scripture and use religion as their shield. These females have similarly hijacked and are using the term "feminism" to support radical notions that are baseless in true, underlying feminist theory. If anything they are betrayers of feminist women, and as they proved violators of women for in essence assaulting them with sexual harassment in trying to convert them to homosexuality and throwing feminent hygiene products at them.

Guest
 

Re: can a man be a feminist?

Postby Guest on Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:34 am

goodguy wrote:As a young boy I often fantisized of being superman and coming to the rescue of my mother who suffered (in mind, body and spirit) and the hands of my father who was nothing short of a tyrant (it's a very long story) but I said that to say this: As a defender of my mother, brother of three sisters, best friend to my wife, father of five daughters, I just have to say that I despise a chauvinist man, I despise a woman beater, control freaks and playboy wannabe's (womanizer) while on the other hand I also despise the spinless, gutless, the selfish, needy, jealous and insecure man. It's my opinion that a lot of men (if not most) have no business being in a relationship with a woman. I will teach my daughters to strive for higher education, self reliance and being independant (in need of no man), to have self respect (to love who and what they are). I will teach them that men are just accessories to be discarded if they don't match or measure up. I pity the fool who gets in the way. My gosh! am I a feminist?



Your a clearly emotionally damaged man an d need therapy. If you are not careful, you girls will grow up being emotionally handicapped women that only men like you will settle for or what is more likely, have no relationship and live the roles of an old spinster. And "daddy" will be to blame.

Think about it.

No man would want to marry into a family that had to deal with a nutcase like you mate.

GET HELP WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME.

Don't f*cked your girls over because you've been f*cked over.

-Ryan
 

Re: can a man be a feminist?

Postby -Ryan on Sun Oct 23, 2005 7:57 pm

. wrote:
goodguy wrote:As a young boy I often fantisized of being superman and coming to the rescue of my mother who suffered (in mind, body and spirit) and the hands of my father who was nothing short of a tyrant (it's a very long story) but I said that to say this: As a defender of my mother, brother of three sisters, best friend to my wife, father of five daughters, I just have to say that I despise a chauvinist man, I despise a woman beater, control freaks and playboy wannabe's (womanizer) while on the other hand I also despise the spinless, gutless, the selfish, needy, jealous and insecure man. It's my opinion that a lot of men (if not most) have no business being in a relationship with a woman. I will teach my daughters to strive for higher education, self reliance and being independant (in need of no man), to have self respect (to love who and what they are). I will teach them that men are just accessories to be discarded if they don't match or measure up. I pity the fool who gets in the way. My gosh! am I a feminist?



Your a clearly emotionally damaged man an d need therapy. If you are not careful, you girls will grow up being emotionally handicapped women that only men like you will settle for or what is more likely, have no relationship and live the roles of an old spinster. And "daddy" will be to blame.

Think about it.

No man would want to marry into a family that had to deal with a nutcase like you mate.

GET HELP WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME.

Don't f*cked your girls over because you've been f*cked over.


Personally I don't quite believe this post but I have seen other "men" like this guy before. Usually they are suffering from a grotesque lack of confidence in their own frail sense of masculinity and have been abused at the hands of some paternal figure and have been scared for it.

As the saying has it: "A jaundice eye sees the world yellow." His view of manhood is his own reflection cast upon the manhood of others, corrupted with great hurt, mistrust, insecurity, and even outright misandry. Just as there are women that are capable of being misogynistic, so are there men capable of housing misandry. This is one such man.

I have seen mothers cast a distrust and even disresepct for other women into their sons, and likewise some "fathers" like this poor excuse for manhood that have similiarly cast fear and mistrust and even hatred for men. Either sex develops a very warped view of the opposite sex, especially during their formative years during adolescent hood.

What this moron does not realize is that men are not the least bit impressed with a woman's so-called "independence" and do not view it with the celebratory status this man thinks it is worthy. Men for centuries have done what only fairly recently woman have slowly come to their own, and the reason has not always been because of the implied "patriarchal oppression" that this man is implying. The ability to wipe your own proverbial arse is not to be smiled out with accomplishment for a woman--it is to be expected today.

This man is living in the past and sounds more like a caveman, who could have easily been one of the cowardly, oppressive men that he is delussionally believing he is saving women from falling victim. His is a classic messiah complex. I mean the man has admitted that he has fantasies of being "superman" and saving women. How puerile. How lakcing in any adult sophistication. How undealing with reality and narcissistic escapism.

I really feel sorry and genuine sadness for his daughters. If anyone needs saving from a man, it is them from their so-called "father." With a man like him in their lives, they'd be hard-pressed to find a more abusive figure or disapproving, controlling tyrant--even if he is not shouting at them or lifting a hand to physically hurt them. There is an emotional component he is oblivious to not considering or recognizing how much of his own pain he is spewing onto them and how it will affect their development.

Guest
 

Re: can a man be a feminist?

Postby Guest on Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:47 am

-Ryan wrote:
. wrote:
goodguy wrote:As a young boy I often fantisized of being superman and coming to the rescue of my mother who suffered (in mind, body and spirit) and the hands of my father who was nothing short of a tyrant (it's a very long story) but I said that to say this: As a defender of my mother, brother of three sisters, best friend to my wife, father of five daughters, I just have to say that I despise a chauvinist man, I despise a woman beater, control freaks and playboy wannabe's (womanizer) while on the other hand I also despise the spinless, gutless, the selfish, needy, jealous and insecure man. It's my opinion that a lot of men (if not most) have no business being in a relationship with a woman. I will teach my daughters to strive for higher education, self reliance and being independant (in need of no man), to have self respect (to love who and what they are). I will teach them that men are just accessories to be discarded if they don't match or measure up. I pity the fool who gets in the way. My gosh! am I a feminist?



Your a clearly emotionally damaged man an d need therapy. If you are not careful, you girls will grow up being emotionally handicapped women that only men like you will settle for or what is more likely, have no relationship and live the roles of an old spinster. And "daddy" will be to blame.

Think about it.

No man would want to marry into a family that had to deal with a nutcase like you mate.

GET HELP WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME.

Don't f*cked your girls over because you've been f*cked over.


Personally I don't quite believe this post but I have seen other "men" like this guy before. Usually they are suffering from a grotesque lack of confidence in their own frail sense of masculinity and have been abused at the hands of some paternal figure and have been scared for it.

As the saying has it: "A jaundice eye sees the world yellow." His view of manhood is his own reflection cast upon the manhood of others, corrupted with great hurt, mistrust, insecurity, and even outright misandry. Just as there are women that are capable of being misogynistic, so are there men capable of housing misandry. This is one such man.

I have seen mothers cast a distrust and even disresepct for other women into their sons, and likewise some "fathers" like this poor excuse for manhood that have similiarly cast fear and mistrust and even hatred for men. Either sex develops a very warped view of the opposite sex, especially during their formative years during adolescent hood.

What this moron does not realize is that men are not the least bit impressed with a woman's so-called "independence" and do not view it with the celebratory status this man thinks it is worthy. Men for centuries have done what only fairly recently woman have slowly come to their own, and the reason has not always been because of the implied "patriarchal oppression" that this man is implying. The ability to wipe your own proverbial arse is not to be smiled out with accomplishment for a woman--it is to be expected today.

This man is living in the past and sounds more like a caveman, who could have easily been one of the cowardly, oppressive men that he is delussionally believing he is saving women from falling victim. His is a classic messiah complex. I mean the man has admitted that he has fantasies of being "superman" and saving women. How puerile. How lakcing in any adult sophistication. How undealing with reality and narcissistic escapism.

I really feel sorry and genuine sadness for his daughters. If anyone needs saving from a man, it is them from their so-called "father." With a man like him in their lives, they'd be hard-pressed to find a more abusive figure or disapproving, controlling tyrant--even if he is not shouting at them or lifting a hand to physically hurt them. There is an emotional component he is oblivious to not considering or recognizing how much of his own pain he is spewing onto them and how it will affect their development.


Nice post mate.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:47 am

sounds like the thread starter has bin brainwashed by women and has turned almost himself into a woman. jeez what a noob.

Brian Delignie
 

Postby Brian Delignie on Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:11 am

. wrote:
. wrote:sometimes I find it irritating that so many women are talking about all the men who did/do them wrong. don't forget who you have to thank and don't forget men had ALL the powers in the western countries not so long ago.


Yes, and feminists paved the way for women to speak up and have their fair share of ''ALL the powers''. Without them, women would still be chained to the cooker and quietened by men like you. Thank Heavens times have changed and no woman has to listen to idiots like you :D 8)


loool. i like the fact that women have more rights in western countries but you have no clue of the real human world around you. women in other nations are shot in the head or putted in jail when they would try to "speak up and have their fair share", you freaking idiot.

think about this one: why is it that only in the rich western countries women have equal rights as the man? why? you think it's all so normal that you have equal rights? just because some feminist women stood up you have rights now? that's what you REALLY think? :lol: think again. if men wanted to stop it, they easily could stop it in that time. they didn't WANT to stop. why:

BECAUSE OF ECONOMICAL REASONS YOU MORON! more workpower makes a stronger economy. :idea: in that time the idea was; why getting foreign workers if you could get cheap women work in the factories. that's how it all started.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:19 am

Brian Delignie wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:sometimes I find it irritating that so many women are talking about all the men who did/do them wrong. don't forget who you have to thank and don't forget men had ALL the powers in the western countries not so long ago.


Yes, and feminists paved the way for women to speak up and have their fair share of ''ALL the powers''. Without them, women would still be chained to the cooker and quietened by men like you. Thank Heavens times have changed and no woman has to listen to idiots like you :D 8)


loool. i like the fact that women have more rights in western countries but you have no clue of the real human world around you. women in other nations are shot in the head or putted in jail when they would try to "speak up and have their fair share", you freaking idiot.

think about this one: why is it that only in the rich western countries women have equal rights as the man? why? you think it's all so normal that you have equal rights? just because some feminist women stood up you have rights now? that's what you REALLY think? :lol: think again. if men wanted to stop it, they easily could stop it in that time. they didn't WANT to stop. why:

BECAUSE OF ECONOMICAL REASONS YOU MORON! more workpower makes a stronger economy. :idea: in that time the idea was; why getting foreign workers if you could get cheap women work in the factories. that's how it all started.


very true. women nowadays don't seem to realise that in that time women and men were not equal. the western countries were leaded by men. the power was in hands of men. it was not normal that women worked or were in politics. just because there were some women who spoke up for themselves didn't mean that was a good reason to give women more powers, someone who thinks that is just a brainwashed feminist imo. more working women for the empty jobspaces is why they women were welcome to the real world.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:37 am

Brian Delignie wrote:loool. i like the fact that women have more rights in western countries but you have no clue of the real human world around you. women in other nations are shot in the head or putted in jail when they would try to "speak up and have their fair share", you freaking idiot.


What's new, doc ?

think about this one: why is it that only in the rich western countries women have equal rights as the man? why? you think it's all so normal that you have equal rights? just because some feminist women stood up you have rights now? that's what you REALLY think? :lol: think again. if men wanted to stop it, they easily could stop it in that time. they didn't WANT to stop. why:

BECAUSE OF ECONOMICAL REASONS YOU MORON! more workpower makes a stronger economy. :idea: in that time the idea was; why getting foreign workers if you could get cheap women work in the factories. that's how it all started.


Who cares ? Times have changed. Women don't have to listen to idiots like you anymore. Thank F*** 8) :wink:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:39 am

. wrote:very true. women nowadays don't seem to realise that in that time women and men were not equal. the western countries were leaded by men. the power was in hands of men. it was not normal that women worked or were in politics. just because there were some women who spoke up for themselves didn't mean that was a good reason to give women more powers, someone who thinks that is just a brainwashed feminist imo. more working women for the empty jobspaces is why they women were welcome to the real world.


*weak smug smile towards your pathetic self*


Feminists kicked your scrawny asses. Nerds.

Guest
 

Re: can a man be a feminist?

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:05 am

goodguy wrote:As a young boy I often fantisized of being superman and coming to the rescue of my mother who suffered (in mind, body and spirit) and the hands of my father who was nothing short of a tyrant (it's a very long story) but I said that to say this: As a defender of my mother, brother of three sisters, best friend to my wife, father of five daughters, I just have to say that I despise a chauvinist man, I despise a woman beater, control freaks and playboy wannabe's (womanizer) while on the other hand I also despise the spinless, gutless, the selfish, needy, jealous and insecure man. It's my opinion that a lot of men (if not most) have no business being in a relationship with a woman. I will teach my daughters to strive for higher education, self reliance and being independant (in need of no man), to have self respect (to love who and what they are). I will teach them that men are just accessories to be discarded if they don't match or measure up. I pity the fool who gets in the way. My gosh! am I a feminist?


why on earth would you feel you need to write this on the internet to a bunch of people that couldnt give a rats ass?

you would do much better to go out in the street and tell people in person, give it ago!

ps. try not to let your wife do the whole StrapOn thing, you dont need to go that far, and steer clear of words like "my gosh" its a wee bit girly!

remember, anywhere but the internet to make a difference anywhere but here!

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:44 am

Brian Delignie wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:sometimes I find it irritating that so many women are talking about all the men who did/do them wrong. don't forget who you have to thank and don't forget men had ALL the powers in the western countries not so long ago.


Yes, and feminists paved the way for women to speak up and have their fair share of ''ALL the powers''. Without them, women would still be chained to the cooker and quietened by men like you. Thank Heavens times have changed and no woman has to listen to idiots like you :D 8)


loool. i like the fact that women have more rights in western countries but you have no clue of the real human world around you. women in other nations are shot in the head or putted in jail when they would try to "speak up and have their fair share", you freaking idiot.

think about this one: why is it that only in the rich western countries women have equal rights as the man? why? you think it's all so normal that you have equal rights? just because some feminist women stood up you have rights now? that's what you REALLY think? :lol: think again. if men wanted to stop it, they easily could stop it in that time. they didn't WANT to stop. why:

BECAUSE OF ECONOMICAL REASONS YOU MORON! more workpower makes a stronger economy. :idea: in that time the idea was; why getting foreign workers if you could get cheap women work in the factories. that's how it all started.


You are the scum that people complain of that gets stuck to the bottom of their shoe. It wasn't so long ago that women in America the so called priveleged nation for all and the UK our brother, that didn't grant rights to women. Their only rights in the eyes of men were to stay at home, and be the doting wife that cooked and cleaned all day. I'd say thank god for the feminists too. Punks like you first want to bitch about Pakistan and 3rd world f*cked up nations that have their women shot in the head, bodies dismembered and enslaved like dogs at the least amout of disobedience. Well there's varying degrees of enslavement, and I for one can say from reading into women's history that the US and UK hasn't for the most part been on the scale of the treatment served in these more barbaric nations, but that's not to say women weren't being treated like second class citizens and still are today to some differing level of degrees.

If you want to make a point, I suggest you make it.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:46 am

. wrote:
Brian Delignie wrote:loool. i like the fact that women have more rights in western countries but you have no clue of the real human world around you. women in other nations are shot in the head or putted in jail when they would try to "speak up and have their fair share", you freaking idiot.


What's new, doc ?

think about this one: why is it that only in the rich western countries women have equal rights as the man? why? you think it's all so normal that you have equal rights? just because some feminist women stood up you have rights now? that's what you REALLY think? :lol: think again. if men wanted to stop it, they easily could stop it in that time. they didn't WANT to stop. why:

BECAUSE OF ECONOMICAL REASONS YOU MORON! more workpower makes a stronger economy. :idea: in that time the idea was; why getting foreign workers if you could get cheap women work in the factories. that's how it all started.


Who cares ? Times have changed. Women don't have to listen to idiots like you anymore. Thank F*** 8) :wink:


Amen to that.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:47 pm

amen to what? :lol:

they still don't get it. :roll: economical reasons.

men are and were only annoyed by these bitching feminists. you don't help/give anything to annoying people. certainly not power. there were other reasons.

i know you feminists like the stories what your mother told you about the feminists heroes (:lol:). it is the same as with santaclaus. when you grow up you will see there is more than what your mother told you. things like power and money.

PreviousNext

Return to Just for Men

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests