cannabis

Discuss Social and Political issues that are affecting you. Bash the Politicians!
mushy7
 

cannabis

Postby mushy7 on Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:31 pm

Just though id start a discussion on cannabis. What do people think about this newly proposed law of re-classifying cannabis to a lower level than alcohol & fags?

I think it should have been legalised long ago. We have much more trouble with drunken idiots than with stonned individuals!..
I also think this would lower petty crime as the police could concentrate on more serious drug issues. Cannabis is a naturally grown produce and is proved to heal some problems people have with pain.

What do you recon???

User avatar
Vajranagini
Transcendent Poster
 
Posts: 13828
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:00 am
Location: Canada

Postby Vajranagini on Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:55 pm

Ask any policeman who he'd rather deal with: a stoner or a drunk. He'll tell you instantly: the STONER. It is a FACT that alcohol was responsible for the debacle of "Woodstock II", at the first one everybody was high on grass and the National Guard could NOT believe what a peaceful, easygoing crowd it was! One of them remarked that if they had had so many good ol' boys and their booze together in one place, there would have been a RIOT for sure! And just look what happened at Woodstock II: Sure enuf!!!
Vajranagini
Vajranagini

Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici: By the power of Truth, I, while living, have conquered the Universe.
(quote from Faust)

User avatar
Gypsum Salt
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5369
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 1:00 am

Postby Gypsum Salt on Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:55 pm

I’m in favour of cannibalising legalists.



Gypsum
NOW AVAILABLE ON SHITTER

"Time is never wasted when you're wasted all the time."

SUPPORT TOURETTES RESEARCH

User avatar
the riddler
Queen
 
Posts: 4976
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:54 pm
Location: London

Postby the riddler on Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:33 pm

Gypsum Salt wrote:I’m in favour of cannibalising legalists.



Gypsum


:rotflmao:

Interesting debate though.....i'd just point to Holland - it doesn't seem to have done much harm there!!

User avatar
dumbfook
Wizard
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:51 am

Postby dumbfook on Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:56 pm

i dont really smoke it but there are far worse things out there than ganja - legalise it, or at least de criminalise it

MAKE LOVE NOT WAR! :music:

constanza
Getting in the Groove
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:14 pm

Postby constanza on Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:12 pm

Or try an alternative, mugwort and catnip make a satisfying substitute and are absolutely legal.

User avatar
chukka
Chatter
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: The good ship Lollipop!

Postby chukka on Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:08 am

The only drug that's ever caused me to miss work or made me ill, is Alcohol!
Cannabis doesn't make you fight and jump on policeman. It should be decriminalised :lol:

User avatar
Ftumch
Saintly
 
Posts: 7071
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:39 pm

Postby Ftumch on Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:50 pm

Decriminalistion and the taxing of the sales of cannabis would be a boon for the country. NHS funding problems over.

User avatar
Obvious
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5018
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:15 pm
Location: Leicestershire, UK

Postby Obvious on Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:37 pm

As an aside to this ... the NHS swallows up approx 65 billion pounds a year in funding ... that's loads more revenue than the taxes on tobacco & alcohol put together (10 billion & 14 billion respectively).

Although it costs just 1.5 billion to treat smokers on the NHS & a smaller amount to treat alcoholics.

Although if you factor in all 'smoking related diseases' ie every bloody disease you can get (it seems), then the 'real' price is higher.

Though personally I think smokers should be at the top of the NHS queues - they have paid far more tax revenue throughout their smoking lives than non smokers & should be treated accordingly - not as lepers.

buttons
Just warming up
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby buttons on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:06 pm

.... :!:

.
Last edited by buttons on Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
wibble
Newbie
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:45 am

Postby wibble on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:48 am

cannabis is less harmful than most legal drugs...

User avatar
Curvey_Brunette
Chatter
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Postby Curvey_Brunette on Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:12 pm

constanza wrote:Or try an alternative, mugwort and catnip make a satisfying substitute and are absolutely legal.


Mugwort shouldn't be smoked, it's used an incense and it can make you "high"

Catnip is far stronger than blow and is an hallucinogen so if you're going to smoke it, be very careful.

As far as weed is concerned, I can't say I've ever heard of anyone on only weed who mugged someone, beat someone up, stole to feed their habit or did anything else anti-social.

Cannabis gets it's 'bad name' because the idiots who take alcohol or other drugs with it usually end up off their head and doing something wrong.

I know a few pot head, most of them are professional people who either grow their own plants or use the money they've earned to score some weed, have a smoke and chill out after a hard day at the office.

So, as far as I'm concerned, so long as the money to buy weed hasn't been got through criminal activity and the person smoking hasn't done anything wrong and isn't harming anyone else, what's the problem?
Curvy Brunette

User avatar
Curvey_Brunette
Chatter
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Postby Curvey_Brunette on Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:17 pm

buttons wrote:Keep cannabis illegal,except for medical use, and ban tobacco,which is often used as the method to take cannabis,because both can cause cancer.


So why do people who have never smoked in their lives get cancer? Some of them lung cancer.

buttons wrote:What's more, if you have friends who smoke the former,you will know they rarely want to do anything except mong,which is boring,and some of them become paranoid,which may be worse.Plus,serious mental illness may be another effect of cannabis.


There's no evidence to support that cannabis itself causes any mental health problems.

What causes the mental health problems in SOME cannabis smokers is the other things they take with it or, in some instances, the crap they add to hash to bulk it out to make a bigger profit.

As for the paranoia aspect you mention, that's a product of the guilt they feel for following "peer pressure" and smoking an illegal drug. It's the actual smoking of the drug that causes the paranoia not the drug itself.
Curvy Brunette

buttons
Just warming up
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:48 pm

Postby buttons on Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:27 pm

:!:
Last edited by buttons on Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Curvey_Brunette
Chatter
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Postby Curvey_Brunette on Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:54 pm

buttons wrote:1)People often get cancer, because they are genetically prone to it. Some substances are believed to cause cancer, e.g. asbestos.


Do you actually know what cancer is?

I'll assume not. In very basic terms it's a mutation of a cell which can't stop growing and dividing hence the formation of lumps.

How it manifests is in a variety of ways which is why you can get breast cancer, testicular cancer, brain cancer, lung cancer, etc ....

Every single one of us has cells in our bodies and so we're ALL able to get it.

All it takes is for one cell to misfire and that's it, you've got the Big C

The fact remains that around the same number of cancer sufferers smoked have never smoked. Roy Castle, an aid anti-smoker got lung cancer which they put down to "smokey clubs" he started out in and inhailing second hand smoke.

How convenient.


buttons wrote:2) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4305783.stm


Hmmm I read that and I became dubious when I read this:

"The study, published in the journal Addiction, followed over 1,000 people born in 1977 for 25 years. "

So what they are saying is that, (given it is now 2006 and 1977 was only 29 years ago), they took a bunch of 4 year old children and made them into cannabis addicts to see what the effects would be?

Or perhaps the inference is all these 4 year old children were already addicts???

You also missed the bit where it said "The researchers also took into account factors such as family history, current mental disorders, and illicit substance abuse."

The report goes on about "chemical changes in the brain" as though it's some sort of fantastic event that shouldn't happen! The fact is that no matter what chemical you put into your body it will have an effect on your brain. Be it chocolate or cocaine, it still has an effect.

The report mentions nothing about social issues, such as the amount of advertising the young are bombarded with today. "You must have this phone, you must wear these clothes, you must behave like this, you must F*** like a porn star, you have to be the best at everything" My god!! If I took any notice of that rubbish I'd be heading towards the lunatic asylum myself.

There's so much pressure on people to get everything NOW, to do everything NOW, to be everything NOW they're out there taking drugs to ESCAPE.

In the 60's they took drugs to be creative, to expand their minds, to chill out and be themselves. These days the kids are taking drugs because they have nothing else, they take them to hide away from the expectations they think everyone has of them.

How else do you explain things like depression in children? Or the reports of kids hanging themselves because they're bullied at school because they don't have the latest phone or the newest clothes?

What's any of that got to do with any drug? The increase in mental issues we're seeing today in people isn't because of a bit of weed, it's because of the world and the amount of pressure people are under to compete, to be the first, to be the best, to live constantly in the fast lane without ever slowing down.

Still there are some things that never change, the good old BBC, as accurate as ever I note :lol: :lol: :lol:

buttons wrote:3) You’re talking nonsense here.


Hmmm, you make a statement but don't validate it, you don't put your point of view across. I wonder why?

Would you care to expand why I'm talking nonsense please?
Curvy Brunette

Next

Return to Politics And Social Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests