CASUAL SEX WITH ANOTHER MAN

Relationships: Stay happy with advice from our loyal advice givers! Keep you relationships on the straight and narrow.

Moderator: Silent One

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:18 am

if you make such absolute conclusions based on your own presumptions that may not be true,

where was my presumption that wasnt true?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:19 pm

noodles wrote:if you make such absolute conclusions based on your own presumptions that may not be true,

where was my presumption that wasnt true?

Would you agree that in your dig quoted below, you presumed what "amoral" means to me?

noodles wrote:
if amoral to you means that others arnt allowed 'thier own' moral code you may as well be steve.

My question is rhetorical, in case you couldn't tell.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:35 pm

You sais i was amoral. You could only have made this statement from information id given in the thread hence my comment. If im wrong 'just correct me instead of playing games' and if the post wasnt intended for me then maybe you should add a name to your posts and be a little clearer who you're directing things at.

wondering wife
 

Postby wondering wife on Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:26 pm

Wow! I caught that smack!!! I am a intrigued person by this whole open marriage thing....Not sure why people would do it.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 am

noodles wrote:You sais i was amoral. You could only have made this statement from information id given in the thread hence my comment. If im wrong 'just correct me instead of playing games' and if the post wasnt intended for me then maybe you should add a name to your posts and be a little clearer who you're directing things at.


I asked if you are amoral based on your post below

."][quote="noodles wrote:
I personally couldnt do it (with a man or another woman). Its not how i conduct my life and for me it would feel wrong and distasteful. This doesnt mean however that I have a right to judge someone whos thinking it may be a possiblity for them.

you are amoral then?

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:50 pm

amoral = without moral principles.

Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral, which is probably why your question made no sense to me. As explained, I have very firm moral principles (for myself). I am not however Lord and Master over anyone else's. They are free to decide what moral principles mean/are to them.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:52 pm

noodles wrote:amoral = without moral principles.

Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral, which is probably why your question made no sense to me. As explained, I have very firm moral principles (for myself). I am not however Lord and Master over anyone else's. They are free to decide what moral principles mean/are to them.

You didn't say that in your post.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:56 pm

I personally couldnt do it (with a man or another woman). Its not how i conduct my life and for me it would feel wrong and distasteful. This doesnt mean however that I have a right to judge someone whos thinking it may be a possiblity for them.

I believe the above says exactly that?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:06 pm

noodles wrote:amoral = without moral principles.

Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral

Actually, there is.

You do not judge others with no morals as bad.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:38 pm

. wrote:
noodles wrote:amoral = without moral principles.

Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral

Actually, there is.

You do not judge others with no morals as bad.



If you're saying that you think your own moral code is such that 'everyone' should follow or be judged then you are an extremely unrealistic and arrogant individual. And if my own stance on the subject brings you to believe i am amoral, fine, think as you like.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:00 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^
btw, noodles, you are arguing with a different guest....my last post was 'You didn't say that in your post'.

guest55
 

Postby guest55 on Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:07 pm

noodles wrote:
. wrote:
noodles wrote:amoral = without moral principles.

Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral

Actually, there is.

You do not judge others with no morals as bad.



If you're saying that you think your own moral code is such that 'everyone' should follow or be judged then you are an extremely unrealistic and arrogant individual. And if my own stance on the subject brings you to believe i am amoral, fine, think as you like.

Only idiots and the amoral dont judge or want to be judged.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:13 pm

. wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^
btw, noodles, you are arguing with a different guest....my last post was 'You didn't say that in your post'.


maybe a name would help?

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:17 pm

guest55 wrote:
noodles wrote:
. wrote:
noodles wrote:amoral = without moral principles.

Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral

Actually, there is.

You do not judge others with no morals as bad.



If you're saying that you think your own moral code is such that 'everyone' should follow or be judged then you are an extremely unrealistic and arrogant individual. And if my own stance on the subject brings you to believe i am amoral, fine, think as you like.

Only idiots and the amoral dont judge or want to be judged.



Of course I judge. I judge that men who hit thier wives should be given longer jail sentences. I judge that those who rape should not be allowed to walk the streets. I judge that adults who harm children should not be given the opportunity to do it again once caught. I judge that anyone who oppresses and abuses another for thier own gratification should be severley dealt with.

What I dont judge is how other adults conduct themselves with consent, and within the confines of thier own lives. That is NOT for me to judge thats for them to choose.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:47 pm

How judgemental. :roll:

PreviousNext

Return to Relationships

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests