Fred75 wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Not her child.
Her decision to have sex with a guy she knew nothing about or even had a commitment with!
Her decision as to who she has sex with and when is up to her, and not for you to say.
This is true.
The child's rights NEVER should be considered.
Whether it be the need for a good father or the right to live or die from abortion.
Because SEX is a right and damn the actual consequences of an adult act.
In both cases the rights of the mother rights supersedes everything else.
The mothers rights will always come before a fetus. While the baby is inside her, it has no rights, the mother has control, and that is the way it should be.
Sometimes I think you wish you were a woman, Fred.
So then... you agree that, if and when the GAY gene is found, a mother has the right to have those gay cells sucked out and washed down the sink?
Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Not her child.
Her decision to have sex with a guy she knew nothing about or even had a commitment with!
Her decision as to who she has sex with and when is up to her, and not for you to say.
This is true.
The child's rights NEVER should be considered.
Whether it be the need for a good father or the right to live or die from abortion.
Because SEX is a right and damn the actual consequences of an adult act.
In both cases the rights of the mother rights supersedes everything else.
The mothers rights will always come before a fetus. While the baby is inside her, it has no rights, the mother has control, and that is the way it should be.
Sometimes I think you wish you were a woman, Fred.
So then... you agree that, if and when the GAY gene is found, a mother has the right to have those gay cells sucked out and washed down the sink?
abortion is the womans choice, and what she does with her body does not concern me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests