Ear piercing before "the Gun" was invented

Beauty: Advice on beauty tips and perfumes. Post your own beauty tips and advice.

Moderator: Silent One

Akshun
 

Postby Akshun on Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:49 pm

ad314 wrote: ....

Where'd you find the patent number?

AD314


Two items in the collection came with patent numbers (GB 765220 and US 3187751) so the trusted Internet search began! I have used the european patent office at http://ep.espacenet.com Try typing GB765220 and this will take you directly to the patent. Look at "mosaics" for pictures.

Many of the patents quote a previous patent and this led to many fun hours following up each one!
There were quite a few "dead ends". The idea for a instrument to pierce human (womens') ears was often based on existing machines used to insert a number/ownership tag in the ear of annimals.

Some of the early instruments look rather scarey! Perhaps the suggestion of being pierced by something "modern", for the time, made the operation seem less traumatic, or maybe not!!

Ian

Dane
Newbie
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Denmark

Postby Dane on Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:37 pm

Thanks a lot!
That is a really great site for seaching for patents! I found patent GB765220 on the first try!
I'm curious to know what types of ear piercing devices you have in the collection you mentioned... -Would you be kind enough to explain, if pictures can't be obtained from you. Also, I heard about the "self piercing earrings" but I never found a single picture of them, so I can't really imagine how they worked.
Why did you never try having your ears pierced by any of the devices in your collection? did you get pierced before you obtained your collection of instruments, or are they simply too crude/scary?
Best regards
Dane

Akshun
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: London

Postby Akshun on Tue Sep 27, 2005 1:08 am

Hi Dane,

Some of your one line questions are going to take a lot more than a line to answer, so forgive what I miss.

The collection currently consists of a Caress Sytem2000, a Studex Universal (black), Inverness and a Caflon Blu. All relatively modern and I think pictures can be found on the manufacturers web sites.
Of the historic, a “Simplicity” GB765220, a Coren US3187751 and a standard ear piercer from Graham-Field inc. The latter looks a little like the Simplicity except it uses a rather large ugly steel stud to pierce the ear! There are also four versions of the typical metal “gun” circa mid/late 1970s when ear piercing became high fashion again.
There is also the scariest of all which is hard to describe, but it has a spring operated needle which does the piercing (I keep a cork on that one!)

I first pierced my ears about 12 years ago, long before the collection began and before even I had an idea of just how many ear piercing devices there had been, and over so many years!
My most recent pair were pierced with a Caflon Blu gun, from my collection, principally because I had sterilized studs for this system and not for the others. I would like to try the “Simplicity” but I don’t have any means to sterilize it ( & Mum already thinks three pairs is far too many – she doesn’t have pierced ears at all – coming from the generation that though it so “low class”). Ultimately, though, I'm (well) old enough and certainly ugly enough, to make my own mind up!!

Self-piercing earrings may sound like good idea, but I’m not so sure!
They are hoop earrings made from a spring material with a sharp point on one side. The idea is they are placed on the part of the lobe to be pierced, and then the wearer waits ….. ! How long, I don’t know, but I can see problems. Keeping everything clean, keeping the earring in the same place especiall at night. They are claimed to be less painfull but I’m not so sure. Have a look at patents US3345830, US3949754, GB21841.
US3760604 is slightly different. Have you seen screw-back earrings for un-pierced ears? These self-piercers are similar having a screw back but with a sharp pointed front. The wearer can decided how fast or slow to pierce.

I currently don’t have any pictures so I hope the patents and description will be OK for now.

Best Wishes
Ian

ad314
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:17 am

Postby ad314 on Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:19 am

Yes, thanks a lot! I never knew there was so much interest in ear piercing devices. Quite a few exploring the tube idea to protect the ear from bad metals and poor finishes. I only knew one person to use the self piercing hoop, and she got tired of waiting and just pushed them through.

Thanks again for the patent info. Spent way too much time today looking through them.

Ad314

User avatar
Barefoot Susan
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: U.K.

Ear piercing tools

Postby Barefoot Susan on Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:22 pm

I asked my mother about this as she had her ears pierced in the Uk in the 1940's. Her parents ran a jewellers shop which did ear piercing.
She remembers the tool which pushed a hollow needle through the ear was called 'Simplicity'. Once the needle was through the ear the tool was disenganged, the sleeper ring was placed into the needle which was then pushed fully theough by hand.
Mum had hers pierced when she was 5 and she was the only girl in the school whith earrings

User avatar
Barefoot Susan
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: U.K.

Ear piercing

Postby Barefoot Susan on Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:36 pm

Further to my earlier reply, Mum has just phoned with some more info.
Before the ears were pierced with the Simplicity tool the lobes were sprayed with Ethyl Chloride to numb them. She remebers this as feeling very cold but as a result she didn't feel the needle go through.
By the time she was 14 she was working in the shop and piercing ears herself. She says that the majority of clients were ladies in their 20's and there were very few girls of school age getting pierced.
How times have changed!

Akshun
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: London

Re: Ear piercing tools

Postby Akshun on Mon Oct 03, 2005 10:38 pm

Barefoot Susan wrote:I asked my mother about this as she had her ears pierced in the Uk in the 1940's. Her parents ran a jewellers shop which did ear piercing.
She remembers the tool which pushed a hollow needle through the ear was called 'Simplicity'. Once the needle was through the ear the tool was disenganged, the sleeper ring was placed into the needle which was then pushed fully though by hand.
Mum had hers pierced when she was 5 and she was the only girl in the school whith earrings


Thanks Susan and Mum for the personal story. Mum has a good memory!
As you will have read, Simplicity is one of the instruments in my collection and the subject of GB Patent 765220. What is interesting is that the patent was filed in 1953 so it was either being used well before that patent was applied for, or there was an earlier model. Something for me to look out for!
(I must get some photos taken and post them somewhere!!)

Ian

User avatar
Barefoot Susan
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: U.K.

Ear piercing tools

Postby Barefoot Susan on Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:10 pm

Mum thinks there was an earlier model. Anyway by the time she was working in the shop the Simplicity tool was a bit different from when she had her ears pierced, but she's not sure what the differences were.
She says that it was also used for piercing the nostrils of the girls from a couple of Indian families who lived in the area. There were no specialist Indian jewellers in those days. She would have liked to have this done herself but no English girls had their nostrils pierced back then. (Unlike my daughters and myself!)

Dane
Newbie
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Denmark

Postby Dane on Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:01 pm

Hi Barefoot Susan!
What a fantastic entry about your mother’s ear piercing experiences, both as a client and piercer. When I uploaded the first questions to this forum, I was convinced that ear piercing would necessarily have been more painful before the piercing gun was invented. It seems like this is not true in a lot of cases. Your mother’s example sound like it was actually a really gentle procedure, even for a very young girl at 5 years.
I guess it has been quire unusual for a girl aged 5 to have pierced ears in the 1940’s, but I think it’s incredible to imagine the same girl piercing the ears of adults in the 50’s, when she was 14 years old herself. I’m surprised if none of the 20+ years old customers were not surprised to learn that a minor would carry out the procedure.
I was slow with my reply to your post, so Akshun mentioned that the first “simplicity” your grandparents had was actually older than the patent. I was pretty surprised to see that.
How did you get your ears and nostril pierced? Did you try being pierced with any of the “simplicity” instruments or just the modern day tools? I’m sure your daughters are both much younger than the ear-piercing gun. I hope we will hear more from you.
Take care.

Dane

User avatar
Barefoot Susan
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: U.K.

Ear piercing tools

Postby Barefoot Susan on Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:20 pm

My memory perhaps is not as good as Mum's so I'm not sure what was used for my first ear piercing, but then Mum had me done when I was very young.
When I started getting additional piercings they were done initially by what I suspect was the Simplicity or something much like it. Then I had a couple done with the (then) new gun, but as by that time I was getting up onto the cartlidge I found them somewhat difficult to heal.
Later I found one of the first specialist piercing shops and got my first nostril piercing with a hollow needle. Since then all my piercings have been needle piercings.
I took my daughters for their first ear piercings when they were 3 years old and they have always had needle piercings.

Dane
Newbie
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:54 am
Location: Denmark

Postby Dane on Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:28 pm

Hi Barefoot Susan!
Thanks for all the info. At first I thought nobody was going to come up with any answers on how ear piercing methods were back in the 70’s and earlier than that. Now with the help of Akshun, Ad314 and Barefoot Susan, I really got to know a lot about what instruments they used. As I mentioned a couple of times before, what surprised me the most, is that many of the methods appear to have been just as painless as what they use today (piercing gun and hollow needle).
I’m not hoping that the string will end here, because I’m always interested in hearing more personal experiences from people who tried having their ears done professionally, before the ear piercing gun was around. Especially I hope that somebody who performed the piercing reads this and wants to share the experience. Barefoot Susan, I deeply appreciate that you took your time to convey your mother’s information to this forum.
I’ve noticed in some forums that people, once they’re familiar with the hollow needle method, tends to assume a sometimes hysterical position against any other piercing method. That especially goes for the gun. I’m sometimes rather baffled by this, since I believe a lot of people have been pierced with the traditional spring-loaded piercing gun, without encountering any trouble. After reading all the posts from this forum, it seems that most of the methods used professionally before the piercing gun, were quite gentle and successful in piercing peoples ears without discomfort or infections.
Once again I want to thank you for sharing and for those who haven’t done it already, I’m still very interested in listening to personal experiences or other information about how ear piercing were performed professionally before the piercing gun were in use. When some of you out there asks older relatives who had personal experiences, please take a minute to share them here.

Take care all of you!

Dane

User avatar
Barefoot Susan
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: U.K.

Ear piercing tools

Postby Barefoot Susan on Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:56 pm

Spent the weekend with my mother and we spent quite a lot of time talking over her memories of her parents' jewellers and ear piercing.
She thought it likely that the Simplicity tool was marketed 'Patent Pending'.
In those days following WW2 everything took a long while due to staffing problems and it is probable that new patents were no exception.

Akshun
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: London

Postby Akshun on Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:53 pm

Here is an interesting piece I found in "SHE" magazine dating from 1972.
I'm sorry it's so long but I didn't want to edit it as it gives an insight into ear piercing at the time, including where and how much! According to the internet, ÂŁ6.50 equates to about ÂŁ55 today!

++++++

earring aid
SALLY VOAK gets a hole in two

There are three things women worry about when coming here to have their ears pierced,” said beauty therapist Katherine Corbett, “one—the position of the holes; two—the cost; three—the pain involved.” Being yellow through and through, my worry was definitely number three. after hearing lurid tales of corks and darning needles, septic lobes, bloodstained pillows, months of anguish and agony I’d very nearly chickened out of the whole “operation” at the last minute.

“Anybody would think you were going to have some sort of necessary surgery—like a vasectomy, or something—instead of just a bit of cosmetic nonsense,” said my husband, adding helpfully, “Of course, you’ll bleed like a tuck pig you know. Tell you what, I’ll do it for you with a fine-gauge electric drill.”
You can always rely on your other half to comfort you in your hour of need
—like hell. Still, like a vasectomy, I was intending to regard this operation as irreversible—no pulling out the sleepers and letting the holes close up at the first twinge of pain or leaping off the couch in agony with one ear pierced and the other intact. No, from this moment on, the decision had been finally made.. . I would go through with it.

When you start doing a bit of research into the kind of people who have pierced ears, you come up with some surprising findings. Gipsy types, old salts, all the women in the life of Roger Vadim and—it’s claimed—half the female population of Lambeth South (under the age of 10!) Reasons seem to vary from status (as in the case of the gipsies), tradition, sex appeal and keeping up with the Joneses. In the bad old days, anyone could be locked up as a vagrant unless he had some visible means of support and single gold hoop worn through one lobe could always be exchanged for food and lodging in times of hardship. The Vadim ladies obviously didn’t have to flog their earrings to buy a crust of bread but golden hoops and pierced ears certainly look good with the kind of wanton tousled beauty mould into which he successively poured Brigitte Bardot, Annette Stroybeng, Catherine Deneuve and Jane Fonda.

The tiny tots of Lambeth? Fond mums with a passion for decorating golden-haired moppets with names like Sharon and Tracy, perhaps? I always remember being acutely envious of girls with pierced ears when I was at school. Although the rules stated “no jewellery allowed except plain wrist watches,” they were allowed to wear their hoops, studs and even pearls! Maybe my present desire for ear piercing was nothing but a Freudian thing after all.

Chuckling nervously at the “painless” claim on the brochure, I booked an appointment with Katherine Corbett, 21 South Molton Street. London W1Y
1DD (Tel: 01-493 5905 and 01-629 6136); she also has a salon at 2 North Street Arcade, Havant, Hants P09 1PX (Tel: 07012 6232). I could have had the job done at a jewellers, but I felt that a beauty specialist would probably be calmer and more sympathetic (and probably more used to mopping up spilt blood!) The cost, including nine ct gold “sleepers” and any after-care, is £6.50. Katherine is one of those very calm ladies who immediately inspires confidence. Her salon is small but cosy with a vaguely medical, as well as cosmetic, atmosphere. This is because she deals with the more “embarrassing” kind of beauty treatments as well as the purely self-indulgent ones. Things like the removal of broken veins, warts, strawberry birthmarks, blackheads and superfluous hair. All her treatments are medically approved and she is an SRN.

Her method of ear-piercing is an unusual one. “After many years of using diathermy for removing superfluous hair, it occurred to me that the cauterising action of the fine electrode I use could solve the bleeding problem with ear-piercing.” Here’s hoping, I thought, as I lay back on the couch and prepared for the worst.

First, Katherine tucked all my hair behind my ears and marked two tiny spots on my ear lobes to pinpoint the position of the holes, I watched in a mirror. ”You’ll notice that the points I’ve marked are quite a distance from the lobe tip—this is to allow a bit of lobe to show below the gold sleeper. Another thing, the holes must balance, and since no-one’s ear lobes are a perfect matching pair it may look as though the marked points are slightly different. They are!”
Satisfied that my holes would “balance”, I tensed myself for the next bit: a local anaesthetic. Just a quick prick into each lobe far less painful than the deep lunging tactics I’d been used to at the dentist. For cowards like me, a “local” is better than a swab with cotton wool soaked in a “freezing” solution. But you must choose a beautician who is an SRN and therefore qualified to give it. In a few seconds my lobes were completely numb and if Katherine hadn’t mentioned that she’d pierced the holes with the diathermy needle, I’d never have known. It was painless, despite the fact that my lobes are tough and thick as old leather.

The next bit was a surprise. I’d heard that the little gold sleepers would be inserted into the holes straight away, to keep them open while the puncture lining grew. Not so. “So many people experience discomfort at the healing stage when gold pins are inserted straight away, that I never try it. Instead, I insert a small piece of surgical silk, which slides easily through the hole and also acts as a dressing.” I didn’t feel this bit either, but I watched in a mirror. The silk is white and stiff. Katherine threaded it through the hole, tied a deft knot at the back of the lobe, cut away the surplus at the front and dabbed on a small dollop of surgical glue to hold it in place. It didn’t show at all. “I used to tie a knot at the front as well until one very smart customer, who couldn’t bear to go about with what looked like two bits of string hanging out of her ears, begged me to cut them off and I hit on the idea of sealing them in with this glue. I’ve done it ever since.”

The main “nasty” bit was over, I was told not to bend down for about 20 minutes in case the blood did decide to flow but there was certainly no evidence of it at this stage. I booked an appointment to have the sleepers inserted in four days’ time and, ever pessimistic, went off to await the deluge. It never came - what did happen was quite different. After about two hours, when the anaesthetic wore off, my ears suddenly felt a bit tingly, as if I’d just surfaced from a deep dive in the sea. They were “popping” a bit too. But none of this was at all painful.

During the next four days, I had to remember not to wash my ears and not to sit under a hairdryer. I also had to resist all temptation to fiddle with the silk plugs. If they did come out, I had instructions not to worry or hurry back as the pins could still be put in with ease. They didn’t, and there was no blood or staining on my pillow.


Day four dawned, and back to the piercing couch for the sleeper insertion. Katherine cleaned off the trace of medicated gum from the front of the lobe, held the silk “tail” at the back of the lobe and twiddled it a bit. It slid out. I thought she’d probably wash away the little bit of “matter” which had accumu-lated—but no. “If I did, the washing would cause the holes to contract slightly, and then I might not be able to get the pins in without injuring the tissue which is already forming so nicely.” I’d chosen round flat studs for my sleepers—Katherine also has spheri-cal ones which can be swapped for a pearl—both in nine ct gold.

She polished the pins on a tissue and inserted them gently. No pain—and an audible sigh of relief from me! She didn’t pull the lobes at all either, just fixed the clips at the back comfortably tight. A too loose sleeper might slide about and cause friction and a too tight one would pinch.

The sleepers had to be left, un-touched, for at least four weeks. No “jiggling” to keep the holes open, bathing with antiseptics or other rituals were necessary. I found that there was a little irritation and I occasionally felt a mad urge to remove the pins. I resisted, which was just as well, as something must be worn constantly for 12 weeks while the lining of the punc-ture is growing. After the initial four-week “no-touch” period, it’s OK to wear other straight bar earrings. Katherine advised dipping the point of the pin in skin food or moisturiser before inserting it, and also told me to apply a spot of talcum powder at the back of the ears at night.

The punctures healed completely after about five weeks, but I resisted my yearning for gipsy hoops until the 12 weeks were up. By then, I’d got used to the feeling of having something hanging from my lobes and didn’t really notice it at all.

I now find it far more comfortable and convenient than wearing clip-style ear-rings, which, because my lobes are rather small, constantly dropped off at odd moments. Additional advantage: I can now hunt for beautiful antique wired earrings to add to my collection and friends know that earrings are a smashing Christmas or birthday present.

The lining of the puncture still feels like a tiny hard bead, but I understand that this will eventually soften. Mean-time, back on the London Underground I spotted an exotic-looking girl with a gaily-coloured ribbon hanging from a pierced hole in her left nostril. Now there’s an idea. .

If you prefer more conventional methods. Selfridges. Oxford Street, London W1A lAB (Tel: 01-629 1234) will pierce both ears and supply sleepers for ÂŁ2.19. Garrards, the crown jewellers at 112 Regent Street, London W1A 2JJ (Tel:
01 -734 7020). charge ÂŁ5 including gold sleepers; gold studs from ÂŁ6.50 and cul-tured pearls from ÂŁ7.50. Cyril Wilkinson, 62 Grosvenor Street. London W1X 9DA (Tel: 01-629 0437) charges from ÂŁ5 for piercing and gold sleepers.

User avatar
Barefoot Susan
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: U.K.

Ear piercing before the gun

Postby Barefoot Susan on Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:17 pm

I was very pleased to read the above account partl because it was the 2nd time in a week that I heard the name Cyril Wilkinson.
I was in a remote pub on a walking day out when a very elderly lady got into conversation with me. She was wearing three pairs of hoops in her ears which is a bit unusual for someone of that age. She was interested in my septum ring and said it was a long time since she had seen a girl wearing one but that when she was a child her mother wore one. We worked out that this would probably have been in the late 1920's and she said that it had for a while been the fashion in the town where she lived (Llandudno in North Wales) for girls to have a pierced septum. Most of them gave up after a couple of years but her mother was one of a few who contunued to wear it. I asked about her piercings and she mentioned that they had been done by Cyril Wilkinson in Mayfair, London while she was working as a chorus girl on the West End Stage. Having had the first hole pierced she went back a couple of months later and got two more on each side (which was very unusual in those days) and had worn them ever since. She thought that Mr Wilkinson used some sort of needle fitted with a handle for the piercing and gold sleeper rings were inserted straight away. She also said that Mr Wilkinson had a daughter who was an actress who attracted press attention because she had a stud pierced in one nostril something which in those days was virtually unheard of for an English girl.

Hope this is of interest

Susan

Akshun
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: London

Postby Akshun on Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:15 pm

Susan,

Thanks for another good personal story. Your contribution to this topic, and others I've also read, are facinating.

Regards
Ian

PreviousNext

Return to Beauty

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests