. wrote:http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/ca-wt-04-19-02/
A new book that says child molesters are not a major peril to children is part of a larger movement within academia to promote "free sexual expression of children."
See that quote above from the article.... It's no different than books arguing homosexuality 30 years ago.
It's LIBERAL thinking at it's best.
My point is that validating homosexuality WAS/IS the first major obstacle that needed to be overcome BEFORE validating sex with children.
Absolute rubbish.
There is a major difference between the two, as someone else has indicated.
Pedophiles have unconsentual sex with people below the age of consent. Therefore, it is r**** on minors.
Homosexuals have consentual sex with people of the same sex, over the age of consent.
The reason homosexuality was legalised is because, when you think about it, there is no real problem and/or issue with it. If heterosexual adults can have consentual sex with each other, it is a nonsense to suggest different for homosexuals.
Pedophillia will not be legalised, and you are very daft if you think so.
And if your prejudice lies with pedophiles, keep it there and not with others who are in no way responsible.
You know all this already, and are just using it as an excuse.