How can lesbian parents make good parents?

Are the polititians doing a good job could you do better, debate your views with others
noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:39 am

. wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:
noodles wrote:And what would you do if you were in power Steve? What laws would you change? What laws would you implement? What would you do with all the children born to gay parents? What would you do with all the people who've gone through committment ceremonies and share lives together?



A man called Hitler had some good ideas - maybe you should read up on him?


That was noodles. didnt sign back in


So then, if Hitler had laws against pedophiles we should toss them all out too because of "guilt by association"?



Dont be a moron. (take that back - just seen your revised one)
Last edited by noodles on Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:44 am

. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:Is this all you ever think about?


No, it's not.
I have several topics that put me in hot water here.
Topics that I would LOVE to debate a "real" colonel on.

Topics that go to the heart of what a man... especially a military man... should be!

Because if you really are a Colonel... you are way above the castrated liberals prowling around here!

By the way... what country are you supposedly supposed to have been a colonel in?



How about for a novelty factor you try to stick to the topic in hand rather than reducing everything into a paedophile frenzy. It would be good to know you have the intelligence to debate. If im not mistaken the topic was 'actually' about lesbian parents.


So although you think we are deviant and vile you wouldnt actually gas us all? I suppose that makes you a slightly better person than i thought you were before.

My questions about what you would do still stands if you wanna answer them. Gay people do exist and children of gay parents exist - so as this is all happening regardless would you propose to be a little more accepting for the sake of the children (if nothing else) or will you continue to preach how awful it all is and be therfore in part responsible for marginalising the children you claim to want to protect.

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 19356
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Postby The Colonel on Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:33 am

. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:I was a Lt. Colonel in the British army.

Tell you what, you give me the topics/issues you would like to debate, and I'll give my opinions on them.

I can't offer a fairer suggestion than that.

You are a charlatan with meaningless opinions.


If mine are meaningless, then so are yours.
I am the Colonel. The One. The Only. The Best. The Best of the Best. Image

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:37 pm

noodles wrote:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:Is this all you ever think about?


No, it's not.
I have several topics that put me in hot water here.
Topics that I would LOVE to debate a "real" colonel on.

Topics that go to the heart of what a man... especially a military man... should be!

Because if you really are a Colonel... you are way above the castrated liberals prowling around here!

By the way... what country are you supposedly supposed to have been a colonel in?



How about for a novelty factor you try to stick to the topic in hand rather than reducing everything into a paedophile frenzy. It would be good to know you have the intelligence to debate. If im not mistaken the topic was 'actually' about lesbian parents.


So although you think we are deviant and vile you wouldnt actually gas us all? I suppose that makes you a slightly better person than i thought you were before. Thanks.




My questions about what you would do still stands if you wanna answer them. Gay people do exist and children of gay parents exist - so as this is all happening regardless would you propose to be a little more accepting for the sake of the children (if nothing else) or will you continue to preach how awful it all is and be therfore in part responsible for marginalising the children you claim to want to protect.
Adult-child lovers do exist and they do have children.
And by definition they DEVIATE from the norm like you do.
Am I wrong to judge them like I judge you?




Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:43 pm

Adult-child lovers do exist and they do have children.
And by definition they DEVIATE from the norm like you do.
Am I wrong to judge them like I judge you?




Adults having sex with children is illegal and immoral. Its abuse.

Gay relationships involving 2 consenting adults who know exactly what they are doing and why has absolutely NOTHING to do with adult-child lovers.

You are totally obsessed.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:43 pm

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/ca-wt-04-19-02/

A new book that says child molesters are not a major peril to children is part of a larger movement within academia to promote "free sexual expression of children."

See that quote above from the article.... It's no different than books arguing homosexuality 30 years ago.

It's LIBERAL thinking at it's best.
My point is that validating homosexuality WAS/IS the first major obstacle that needed to be overcome BEFORE validating sex with children.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:46 pm

. wrote:Adult-child lovers do exist and they do have children.
And by definition they DEVIATE from the norm like you do.
Am I wrong to judge them like I judge you?




Adults having sex with children is illegal and immoral. Its abuse.

Gay relationships involving 2 consenting adults who know exactly what they are doing and why has absolutely NOTHING to do with adult-child lovers.

You are totally obsessed.



30 years ago SODOMY was illegal.
Your a fool to think the validation of homosexuality is not the key to validating adult-child lovers.

Removing the stigma of homosexuality to the masses is one LESS barrier against pedophiles.

the NETHERLANDS pedophile political party PROVES that

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:47 pm

. wrote:http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/ca-wt-04-19-02/

A new book that says child molesters are not a major peril to children is part of a larger movement within academia to promote "free sexual expression of children."

See that quote above from the article.... It's no different than books arguing homosexuality 30 years ago.

It's LIBERAL thinking at it's best.
My point is that validating homosexuality WAS/IS the first major obstacle that needed to be overcome BEFORE validating sex with children.



Its a very interesting article steve however its got nothing at all to do with homosexuality and again nothing to do with the topic :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:53 pm

. wrote:
. wrote:Adult-child lovers do exist and they do have children.
And by definition they DEVIATE from the norm like you do.
Am I wrong to judge them like I judge you?




Adults having sex with children is illegal and immoral. Its abuse.

Gay relationships involving 2 consenting adults who know exactly what they are doing and why has absolutely NOTHING to do with adult-child lovers.

You are totally obsessed.



30 years ago SODOMY was illegal.
Your a fool to think the validation of homosexuality is not the key to validating adult-child lovers.

Removing the stigma of homosexuality to the masses is one LESS barrier against pedophiles.

the NETHERLANDS pedophile political party PROVES that



Removing the stigma of homosexuality does not encourage anything. Paedophiles are paedophiles - more of them are straight than gay. Paedophilia is not about bieng queer its about power and manipulation. Most young children are molested by family members and friends. You are talking out of your arse again :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:53 pm

. wrote:
. wrote:Adult-child lovers do exist and they do have children.
And by definition they DEVIATE from the norm like you do.
Am I wrong to judge them like I judge you?




Adults having sex with children is illegal and immoral. Its abuse.

Gay relationships involving 2 consenting adults who know exactly what they are doing and why has absolutely NOTHING to do with adult-child lovers.

You are totally obsessed.



30 years ago SODOMY was illegal.
Your a fool to think the validation of homosexuality is not the key to validating adult-child lovers.

Removing the stigma of homosexuality to the masses is one LESS barrier against pedophiles.

the NETHERLANDS pedophile political party PROVES that



Removing the stigma of homosexuality does not encourage anything. Paedophiles are paedophiles - more of them are straight than gay. Paedophilia is not about bieng queer its about power and manipulation. Most young children are molested by family members and friends. You are talking out of your arse again :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:50 pm

. wrote:Removing the stigma of homosexuality does not encourage anything.


Your WRONG!

The NETHERLANDS is PROOF!
They have a very LIBERAL thinking and approve of gays and gay marriage!

Your a naive fool to think otherwise!
Even in the USA the ACLU fights for the rights of groups like
N
A
M
B
L
A

to have free speech!
And why does the ACLU help pedo's like that?
Because if you let one group of deviants have a VOICE you have to let ALL DEVIANTS have a voice. PERIOD.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:05 pm

. wrote: Most young children are molested by family members and friends. You are talking out of your arse again :roll:


Idiot!
When society disapproves of adult-child love what does an adult do????

The adult has children!
The adult marries one with children.

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 19356
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Postby The Colonel on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:20 pm

. wrote:http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/ca-wt-04-19-02/

A new book that says child molesters are not a major peril to children is part of a larger movement within academia to promote "free sexual expression of children."

See that quote above from the article.... It's no different than books arguing homosexuality 30 years ago.

It's LIBERAL thinking at it's best.
My point is that validating homosexuality WAS/IS the first major obstacle that needed to be overcome BEFORE validating sex with children.


Absolute rubbish.

There is a major difference between the two, as someone else has indicated.

Pedophiles have unconsentual sex with people below the age of consent. Therefore, it is r**** on minors.

Homosexuals have consentual sex with people of the same sex, over the age of consent.

The reason homosexuality was legalised is because, when you think about it, there is no real problem and/or issue with it. If heterosexual adults can have consentual sex with each other, it is a nonsense to suggest different for homosexuals.

Pedophillia will not be legalised, and you are very daft if you think so.

And if your prejudice lies with pedophiles, keep it there and not with others who are in no way responsible.

You know all this already, and are just using it as an excuse.
I am the Colonel. The One. The Only. The Best. The Best of the Best. Image

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:23 pm

. wrote:
. wrote: Most young children are molested by family members and friends. You are talking out of your arse again :roll:


Idiot!
When society disapproves of adult-child love what does an adult do????

The adult has children!
The adult marries one with children.

cont...
And the ADULT gets cozy withe a friends children!

Your not very bright are you?
Pedo's take the shortest route to children.
That's why family and friends are most often the victim!

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:29 pm

The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/ca-wt-04-19-02/

A new book that says child molesters are not a major peril to children is part of a larger movement within academia to promote "free sexual expression of children."

See that quote above from the article.... It's no different than books arguing homosexuality 30 years ago.

It's LIBERAL thinking at it's best.
My point is that validating homosexuality WAS/IS the first major obstacle that needed to be overcome BEFORE validating sex with children.


Absolute rubbish.

There is a major difference between the two, as someone else has indicated.

Pedophiles have unconsentual sex with people below the age of consent. Therefore, it is r**** on minors.

Homosexuals have consentual sex with people of the same sex, over the age of consent.

The reason homosexuality was legalised is because, when you think about it, there is no real problem and/or issue with it. If heterosexual adults can have consentual sex with each other, it is a nonsense to suggest different for homosexuals.

Pedophillia will not be legalised, and you are very daft if you think so.

And if your prejudice lies with pedophiles, keep it there and not with others who are in no way responsible.

You know all this already, and are just using it as an excuse.



Now it's time for YOU to do some homework!
You read the psychobabble the pedo's put out and you will see they argue that children as young as 12 are capable of consensual sex!
There are LIBERAL psychologists writing books saying children are capable of consensual sex!
They are constantly LOWERING the age of consensual sex!

PreviousNext

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest