How can lesbian parents make good parents?

[Guest]

Your right Im just debating for the sake of it.

I still stand by that any home that provides love and care for a child is a good home. thats it, have a good weekend.

A chimpanzee family in a good zoo could do that for an infant child.

Does that make the chimpanzee's the equall of two heterosexual parents?

you really think so?

what kinda drugs are you on, dude?

[noodles]

What drugs? Any kind that feeds him. Unfortunately 'we' are his drug here and continue to offer ourselves to the addiction that is himself.

[animallover15]

Tell you what... you tell me what you gain in your arguement by having me chose an answer that is a lesser of two evils?

Because that's all you are doing... making one choice a NORMAL and POSITIVE choice simply because it's better than a bad choice.
That's not how policy should be made.

PMSL...This exactly what you do every time you make a poll.

[Guest]

Compare analogous situations:

1) a functional, stable, monogamous heterosexual couple raising their biological child
2) a functional, stable, monogamous gay or lesbian couple raising their adopted child
3) a functional, stable, monogamous heterosexual couple raising their adopted child

In terms of what is best for the child, I would say 1 then 3, then 2, with large margins between each.

[Blond Adult Girl]

In lesbian homes, parenting strategies are used on boys without input from anyone who actually knows what it’s like to be a boy.

And the same goes for two gay men raising a girl!

It's WRONG for gay parents to raise children PERIOD!

A mommy and a daddy is always better then a mommy and a mommy or a daddy and a daddy, but a daddy and a daddy or a mommy and a mommy is better then nothing.

Gays should be allowed to adopt children.

[.Drinker]

my sister is a lesbo and she keeps my kids.

[Guest]

Compare analogous situations:

1) a functional, stable, monogamous heterosexual couple raising their biological child
2) a functional, stable, monogamous gay or lesbian couple raising their adopted child
3) a functional, stable, monogamous heterosexual couple raising their adopted child

In terms of what is best for the child, I would say 1 then 3, then 2, with large margins between each.

Agreed, but very, very large margins.

[Blond Adult Girl]

In lesbian homes, parenting strategies are used on boys without input from anyone who actually knows what it’s like to be a boy.

And the same goes for two gay men raising a girl!

It's WRONG for gay parents to raise children PERIOD!

A mommy and a daddy is always better then a mommy and a mommy or a daddy and a daddy, but a daddy and a daddy or a mommy and a mommy is better then nothing.

Gays should be allowed to adopt children.

Of course it's better than NOTHING.
But that's not the reason to make LAW"S staing that homosexual parents are the EQUAL of hetero ones.
That's what the gay's want.
LAW"S makin them the equal.
Taking away the right of an adoption agency to say that hetero parents are the better of the two.

Hmmm...

I think that heterosexual parents should be considered FIRST, but that doesn't mean gay parents should be excluded altogether.

[Guest]

why?

[Guest]

Hmmm...

I think that heterosexual parents should be considered FIRST, but that doesn't mean gay parents should be excluded altogether.

If gay parents are all that's left for an agency to use... sure.. I can understand that.

But that's not what the gay's want.
They want to be able to sue saying they are the equal of hetero's.
That just wrong.
Say for instance a religious run adoption agency has a child up for adoption. if gay's get their way... the adoption agency HAS to give the gay's the child because to not do so is discrimination.
Which is what is happening now in the UK.

This is true in the United States as well, but here the war declared by the gay organizations is against religion in general and Christianity in particular, by far the major religion in America. They also want to make Catholic hospitals perform elective abortions and force them to hire openly gay people even though Catholicism is against abortion and homosexuality. The irony is that in NYC, the Catholic hospitals and hospices were the ones that admitted and humanely cared for massive numbers of gay AIDS patients without health insurance when AIDS was new and untreatable. Christians do not hate the sinner, just the sin. They do not hate gay people, but their religion considers homosexual acts an abomination, as do Judaism and Islam. Gays know they can never get what they want through the democratic process because the vast majority of people oppose the gay agenda while at the same time tolerating homosexuality. What the gays couldn't get at the ballot box, they tried to get through the courts. They tried to get the courts to legislate, which is not a judicial power. Liberal judges would legislate the gay agenda from the bench, democracy be damned, if they could. Problem is that the U.S. Constitution specifically protects freedom of religion but makes no mention whatsoever of homosexuality.

[Guest]

They also want to make Catholic hospitals perform elective abortions and force them to hire openly gay people even though Catholicism is against abortion and homosexuality.

Haha. The Catholic church are just hypocrites.

They are also supposedly against ***p*** and their priests having sex but Priests have been given nothing but a pat on the back while they continue to molest the children that come through their diocese. Same goes for the Priests who have maintained relationships with parishoners some even fathering children with them.

That's some sacred and moral institution .

[tamachant]

Does that make the chimpanzee's the equall of two heterosexual parents?

No definatelly not, most Chimpanzee's are far beyond the average human in intellegance.

[Blond Adult Girl]

why?

Was that directed at me or Drinker?

[Guest]

why lesbian, not bisexual?

[tamachant]

Oh hell they should just ban all people form having children. Reduce the population and all.