Fred75 wrote:myron myron wrote:Fred75 wrote:myron myron wrote:Fred75 wrote:noodles wrote:mogadishu wrote:Fred75 wrote:No.
If they were equal to heterosexuals the reverse would be true.
A heterosexual man could impregnate a gay man.
Equal in what way?
He doesnt know what he's talking about. Many straight men and women cant procreate. I suppose they are less-people tooHe makes about as much sense as a chocolate fireguard.
They too are defective.
Not "less-people". Just born with a defect.
Like a person born with no hand(s).
Unless of course it was some sort of accident that they lost the capability to reproduce.
Are people with low intelligence "defective"?
Should mentally retarded people procreate?
Should the retarded procreate?
NO.
Why should society pay the burden of raising children the parents are incapable of doing themselves!
Unless of course you live in a NANNY state like the UK where they wipe your ass for you because of your incompetence.
If a mentally retarded couple capable of procreating wishes to procreate, should they be prevented?
If so, how?
Are you asking us if the rights of the retarded supersede the rights of the child(ren) to be raised in a proper family?
My two questions are direct and unambiguous; the words I chose convey my thoughts precisely.
They follow logically from your statement that the retarded should not procreate.
The first question has only two possible answers: yes or no.
If the answer to the first question is "no," the second question is moot.
If the answer to the first question is "yes," the second question asks how.














