Fred75 wrote:How come gays are born defective?
I mean this in no disrespect.... but if they are born that way how come they are not born in a manner that allows them to reproduce?
Or better yet.... since they cannot reproduce that way with each other why is it that they even have genitalia?
See.... I'm confused... what's the defect.... born gay or born gay with useless genitalia of reproduction?
noodles wrote:Fred75 wrote:How come gays are born defective?
I mean this in no disrespect.... but if they are born that way how come they are not born in a manner that allows them to reproduce?
Or better yet.... since they cannot reproduce that way with each other why is it that they even have genitalia?
See.... I'm confused... what's the defect.... born gay or born gay with useless genitalia of reproduction?
How come some people are born completely and utterly obesessed with homosexuality

Fred75 wrote:How come gays are born defective?
See.... I'm confused... what's the defect.... born gay or born gay with useless genitalia of reproduction?

The Colonel wrote:So is that why you told me to book my 16 year old in for a castration and penectomy then Fred?
Is that what your morality tells you?
Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:How come gays are born defective?
See.... I'm confused... what's the defect.... born gay or born gay with useless genitalia of reproduction?
i could answer that question but it will ignite a flame war
Fred75 wrote:The Colonel wrote:So is that why you told me to book my 16 year old in for a castration and penectomy then Fred?
Is that what your morality tells you?
I don't think that was me that said that... as it id I have to look up "penectomy" just to know what it is!

Fred75 wrote:Bobin wrote:
i could answer that question but it will ignite a flame war
Dont worry about that!
Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:Bobin wrote:
i could answer that question but it will ignite a flame war
Dont worry about that!
Whenever a genetic defect is found in the chromosome set, the inability of that organism to reproduce is disproportionally high in comparison to the general population. Defective gene sets are not conducive to either meiosis or propagation of the species.
The genetic principle, when applied to social structure, yeilds the terms "survival of the fittest" or "natural selection".
Fred75 wrote:Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:Bobin wrote:
i could answer that question but it will ignite a flame war
Dont worry about that!
Whenever a genetic defect is found in the chromosome set, the inability of that organism to reproduce is disproportionally high in comparison to the general population. Defective gene sets are not conducive to either meiosis or propagation of the species.
The genetic principle, when applied to social structure, yeilds the terms "survival of the fittest" or "natural selection".
So then we can conclude gays are not the "fittest" or "natural" then?

Fred75 wrote:
I mean this in no disrespect.... but if they are born that way how come they are not born in a manner that allows them to reproduce?
Or better yet.... since they cannot reproduce that way with each other why is it that they even have genitalia?
See.... I'm confused... what's the defect.... born gay or born gay with useless genitalia of reproduction?

The Colonel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Bobin wrote:Fred75 wrote:Bobin wrote:
i could answer that question but it will ignite a flame war
Dont worry about that!
Whenever a genetic defect is found in the chromosome set, the inability of that organism to reproduce is disproportionally high in comparison to the general population. Defective gene sets are not conducive to either meiosis or propagation of the species.
The genetic principle, when applied to social structure, yeilds the terms "survival of the fittest" or "natural selection".
So then we can conclude gays are not the "fittest" or "natural" then?
No, you can't.
Return to Politics And Social Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests