How tolerant are we really?

[beautiful]

Would it be considered a promiscuous lifestyle if gays were married?
The BIG attraction of the gay MALE lifestyle is it's promiscuity!
So marriage for them is a big IF!
An unrealistic IF that's pointless to bring up, IMO.

Africans with aids were heterosexual, are you going to tell me gays from another continent are to blame for that?
Their promiscuity and LACK OF CONDOMS condemned them.


There is no such thing as gay aids and it only became a threat when it hit bisexuals and heterosexuals. I guess the plan just didn't work, even the smartest scientists couldn't think before hand that not all gays were strictly gay...oops!

You really don't buy the green monkey theory do you?

So were gays already in existance taught in school that it's okay to have mommy and mommy, daddy and daddy hence resulting in their gayness today?
My point is that in order for homosexuals to have children they have to lose the opposite sex from the parents!
Losing the other sex just teaches children that the opposite sex is disposable and unnessesary in the raising of a child.
Now you have no arguement for keeping parents together for the welfare of the child!

Oh okay, you have no problems with lesbians then, gotcha. You probably have fantasies of lesbians hence making it okay.

So all straight people wear condoms? What is your point of bringing up condoms again?

[Scott L. Martinez]

He never has a point!

He's been proven wrong a thousand times, but he's still spouting the same crap!

Don't worry. He's just slow, he obviously didn't do well at school, since he can't spell properly yet.

You have to make allowances for slow people. They have subnormal intelligence, and due to this their ego is hyper activated to compensate.

This is why Kalell is dumb, but still thinks he can rule the world!

[beautiful]

He never has a point!

He's been proven wrong a thousand times, but he's still spouting the same crap!

Don't worry. He's just slow, he obviously didn't do well at school, since he can't spell properly yet.

You have to make allowances for slow people. They have subnormal intelligence, and due to this their ego is hyper activated to compensate.

This is why Kalell is dumb, but still thinks he can rule the world!

Ahhh I see

[Guest]

....and so it all goes to prove (here on this forum), no one is very tolerant to each others views. So then, what now...?

[beautiful]

....and so it all goes to prove (here on this forum), no one is very tolerant to each others views. So then, what now...?

What is your idea of tolerance? If you mean not kissing everyone's ass or voicing your views of not agreeing, that's not what tolerance is about. That's fake tolerance and grinning at someone and biting your tongue because you feel forced to not be yourself.

You can disagree and someone else can disagree back. I think people are feeling as though in order to be tolerant you have to just be quiet and nod your head when really you aren't.

Is this how people feel today?

[Scott L. Martinez]

....and so it all goes to prove (here on this forum), no one is very tolerant to each others views. So then, what now...?

It’s hard to be tolerant of someone’s views when they are as vile as Kalell’s. I think numerous members would agree with that.

If people want a civilised discussion, we could easily have it!

Trouble is, Kalell would find it, and destroy it as he always does.

[Guest]

Losing the other sex just teaches children that the opposite sex is disposable and unnessesary in the raising of a child.
Now you have no arguement for keeping parents together for the welfare of the child!

That's rubbish. It fails even basic logic.

Many kids are brought up by one parent with out contact from the other parent, either by death, divorce or separation.

Lets' look at what it takes to make YOUR basic logic GOOD!
Death of a parent is GOOD for a child.
Divorce is GOOD for a child! (That's your cue, Danieleff)
Seperation is GOOD for a child!

Granted if the atmosphere was a destructive one.. all those are GOOD!


But your not using it that way. Are you?

No... your logic is a bad scenario justifying more BAD ideas!

So, Scott or Elliot... whatever you like... Your logic is flawed!
Let's see you do better next post...OK?

[Scott L. Martinez]

Let's see you SPELL better next time Kalell...OK?

[Guest]

....and so it all goes to prove (here on this forum), no one is very tolerant to each others views. So then, what now...?

We debate and let others decide for themselves what they want...

Do we put society and children first

or

Do we put the selfish desires of the individual first and let more plagues occur and more children grow up in broken homes.

[Scott L. Martinez]

You did spell better there, I’ll give you that.

Just a shame it wasn’t anything worth reading!

[Scott L. Martinez]

You did spell better there, I’ll give you that.

Just a shame it wasn’t anything worth reading!

[Guest]

You have very good LIBERAL arguments that sound good and convincing!



But they are all based on the selfish desire of the individual.

None of them put WHAT"S BEST FOR A CHILD FIRST!

So, until you can show that teaching children that a parent can be disposable is a good thing under good situations (not death n divorce n abuse, etc..) you will not win your arguement!

What's best for a child and society as a whole will always trump liberal thinking!

[Scott L. Martinez]

You have very good LIBERAL arguments that sound good and convincing!



But they are all based on the selfish desire of the individual.

None of them put WHAT"S BEST FOR A CHILD FIRST!

So, until you can show that teaching children that a parent can be disposable is a good thing under good situations (not death n divorce n abuse, etc..) you will not win your arguement!

What's best for a child and society as a whole will always trump liberal thinking!

I'm a liberal-conservative actually. I'm a youth member of the UK Conservative Party, which is headed by the liberal-conservative David Cameron.

Situation: Child in care/orphanage.

Options: a) Stay in care/orphanage.
b) Adoption by a gay couple.

Whats best for the child: The answer is b)

Simple really.

[Guest]

You have very good LIBERAL arguments that sound good and convincing!



But they are all based on the selfish desire of the individual.

None of them put WHAT"S BEST FOR A CHILD FIRST!

So, until you can show that teaching children that a parent can be disposable is a good thing under good situations (not death n divorce n abuse, etc..) you will not win your arguement!

What's best for a child and society as a whole will always trump liberal thinking!

I'm a liberal-conservative actually. I'm a youth member of the UK Conservative Party, which is headed by the liberal-conservative David Cameron.

Situation: Child in care/orphanage.

Options: a) Stay in care/orphanage.
b) Adoption by a gay couple.

Whats best for the child: The answer is b)

Simple really.

Child abondoned on island with ex street walking lady that happens to be lactating.
Child suckles tit of lady or dies.
What to do?

Abny idiot would answer yes to your scenario!
But that doesnt make it the right thing to do!

Theres a big difference between what right and all that there is left!

maybe to other teenagers your logic sounds good!
But not to the adults that read!

[beautiful]

You have very good LIBERAL arguments that sound good and convincing!



But they are all based on the selfish desire of the individual.

None of them put WHAT"S BEST FOR A CHILD FIRST!

So, until you can show that teaching children that a parent can be disposable is a good thing under good situations (not death n divorce n abuse, etc..) you will not win your arguement!

What's best for a child and society as a whole will always trump liberal thinking!

I'm a liberal-conservative actually. I'm a youth member of the UK Conservative Party, which is headed by the liberal-conservative David Cameron.

Situation: Child in care/orphanage.

Options: a) Stay in care/orphanage.
b) Adoption by a gay couple.

Whats best for the child: The answer is b)

Simple really.

Child abondoned on island with ex street walking lady that happens to be lactating.
Child suckles tit of lady or dies.
What to do?

Abny idiot would answer yes to your scenario!
But that doesnt make it the right thing to do!

Theres a big difference between what right and all that there is left!

maybe to other teenagers your logic sounds good!
But not to the adults that read!

I'm an adult and it makes sense. Do you mean everyone past the age 50?