I love McCain!! And this is why...

[Cambridge]

Well, Bill Clinton has the experience and would be qualified to be president, but the super delegates didn't have the gumption to do their job and nominate Hillary.

George H. W. Bush has the experience, would be qualified to be president and has a term left of eligbility, but he didn't run.

McCain has a wealth of high-quality government and military experience that would be very helpful to him if he were to serve as president. Barry O'Bumma has a couple of years as an undistinguished rookie senator and a bunch of catchy campaign slogans and reverend-quality inspirational speeches. You make the call.

McCain has a wealth of high-quality government and military experience that would be very helpful to him if he were to serve as president.

And that is what? He spent the Vietnam War as a prisoner of war, and while that is to his extreme credit, it does not anoint him with the skills to be president. Suppose we took someone off of death row in a Texas prision, who’s DNA proved he didn’t do it, does that make him qualified to be president. I doubt it.

[Sistergurl]

cambridge are you anti american? you write about each man poorly. do you trouble yourself to vote for one of them. or do you only find faults with all things including other members. you have a sad view of life. someone must have hurt you. take a stand for something and find good in life. it is not all bad unless that is how you want to live it.

[Big Ben]

Yes bushwalker/david, you tried that dialector joke before. That kind of humour was funny when we were six years old. When we were seven, it seemed childish because most of us grew up.

What happened to you?

[Big Ben]

Well, Bill Clinton has the experience and would be qualified to be president, but the super delegates didn't have the gumption to do their job and nominate Hillary.

George H. W. Bush has the experience, would be qualified to be president and has a term left of eligbility, but he didn't run.

McCain has a wealth of high-quality government and military experience that would be very helpful to him if he were to serve as president. Barry O'Bumma has a couple of years as an undistinguished rookie senator and a bunch of catchy campaign slogans and reverend-quality inspirational speeches. You make the call.

McCain has a wealth of high-quality government and military experience that would be very helpful to him if he were to serve as president.

And that is what? He spent the Vietnam War as a prisoner of war, and while that is to his extreme credit, it does not anoint him with the skills to be president. Suppose we took someone off of death row in a Texas prision, who’s DNA proved he didn’t do it, does that make him qualified to be president. I doubt it.

And John Edwards tells his 516th story about a man living under a bridge, so the democratic voters kick him out of the democratic primary race. So he makes TV commercials and makes sure he does not attend any hearings in Congress.

Tell you what, McCain's credentials are looking better and better.

[Big Ben]

David, you showed you are a biased liberal by removing all the bork bork's out of cambridge's dialectized post.

You've been exposed for what you are.

For the record:

Dialectizer (Swedish Chef) wrote:

Und thet is vhet? He-a spent zee Feeetnem Ver es a preesuner ooff ver, und vheele-a thet is tu hees ixtreme-a credeet, it dues nut unueent heem veet zee skeells tu be-a preseedent. Um de hur de hur de hur. Sooppuse-a ve-a tuuk sumeune-a ooffff ooff deet roo in a Texes preesiun, vhu’s DNA prufed he-a deedn’t du it, dues thet meke-a heem qooeleeffied tu be-a preseedent. Um de hur de hur de hur. I duoobt it. Um de hur de hur de hur.

[Big Ben]

Yeah, yeah, liberals always have any excuse

[azraelle]

Well, Bill Clinton has the experience and would be qualified to be president, but the super delegates didn't have the gumption to do their job and nominate Hillary.
.....

"Billary" joking aside, We, as a nation, much less as human beings, ought to have left the concept of a wife as president being just a shill for her husband way back in the dark ages. Hillary would have served with her own brand of distinction quite well, thank you, even if her philandering cigar-toting half-assed excuse for a husband had croaked on the campaign trail (as a matter of fact, she probably would have gotten the nomination had that happened!).

If you can't rationally discuss and dissect a person on his OR HER merits as a human being, regardless of gender, then you ought to at least find another forum to spout your bigoted innuendo.

[Big Ben]

Well, Bill Clinton has the experience and would be qualified to be president, but the super delegates didn't have the gumption to do their job and nominate Hillary.
.....

"Billary" joking aside, We, as a nation, much less as human beings, ought to have left the concept of a wife as president being just a shill for her husband way back in the dark ages. Hillary would have served with her own brand of distinction quite well, thank you, even if her philandering cigar-toting half-assed excuse for a husband had croaked on the campaign trail (as a matter of fact, she probably would have gotten the nomination had that happened!).

If you can't rationally discuss and dissect a person on his OR HER merits as a human being, regardless of gender, then you ought to at least find another forum to spout your bigoted innuendo.

Ah yes, when someone says something you don't like, even though it's been said thousands of times before, you play the bigot name-calling card. Guess you learned your lessons well from the democrats in your state. Have it your way - be a crybaby and sit out the election.

[azraelle]

Well, Bill Clinton has the experience and would be qualified to be president, but the super delegates didn't have the gumption to do their job and nominate Hillary.
.....

"Billary" joking aside, We, as a nation, much less as human beings, ought to have left the concept of a wife as president being just a shill for her husband way back in the dark ages. Hillary would have served with her own brand of distinction quite well, thank you, even if her philandering cigar-toting half-assed excuse for a husband had croaked on the campaign trail (as a matter of fact, she probably would have gotten the nomination had that happened!).

If you can't rationally discuss and dissect a person on his OR HER merits as a human being, regardless of gender, then you ought to at least find another forum to spout your bigoted innuendo.

Ah yes, when someone says something you don't like, even though it's been said thousands of times before, you play the bigot name-calling card. Guess you learned your lessons well from the democrats in your state. Have it your way - be a crybaby and sit out the election.

I notice you didn't manage to intelligently address the ACTUAL SUBJECT. Was that because you are incapable of rationally defending your prejudices, or because you figured criticizing my use of the word "bigot" would get you more sympathy?

[azraelle]

Have it your way - be a crybaby and sit out the election.

I have been accused in other threads of "throwing away my vote" if I were to vote Libertarian, or write in Ron Paul.

What, pray tell, is the difference between that and voting for the mainstream candidate that doesn't win? Not a GD thing. From your point of view, I am still "throwing away my vote" or "sitting out the election". The only way, it seems to me, to avoid "throwing away my vote" is for there to be only one candidate, e.g. THE WINNER. Carrying this forward to it's logical conclusion--why don't we just adopt the system that existed in Mother Russia before Glasnost--we'll just have one candidate, decided upon by the aristocratic elite who know what's best for us, and we get to vote "Yes" or "No", with some sort of KGB equivalent looking over our shoulders making sure that we vote "the right way".

At least, no one will ever again be accused of "THROWING AWAY THEIR VOTE"!

[coolz]

Mcain SUCKS. OBAMA NUMBER ONE NUMBER ONE!

[Fred75]

:D

Celebrity Endorsements:

Barack Obama:___Oprah Winfrey

John McCain:_____Paris Hilton

Must be a message in there somewhere?

Racism?

[ZiaAries]

:D

Celebrity Endorsements:

Barack Obama:___Oprah Winfrey

John McCain:_____Paris Hilton

Must be a message in there somewhere?

Racism?

When has Paris Hilton endorsed John McCain? If this is in reference to the spoof, I don't see that as an "endorsement" by any stretch of the imagination. I view it as her disapproval of his using of her in the ad. She remained neutral, or supportive, which ever way you want to look at it, of both candidates in regard to the one issue she brought up which was the fuel crisis.

[Fred75]

:D

Celebrity Endorsements:

Barack Obama:___Oprah Winfrey

John McCain:_____Paris Hilton

Must be a message in there somewhere?

Racism?

When has Paris Hilton endorsed John McCain? If this is in reference to the spoof, I don't see that as an "endorsement" by any stretch of the imagination. I view it as her disapproval of his using of her in the ad. She remained neutral, or supportive, which ever way you want to look at it, of both candidates in regard to the one issue she brought up which was the fuel crisis.

means I was joking. Playing into the feelings of those that see racism everywhere.

[ZiaAries]

:D

Celebrity Endorsements:

Barack Obama:___Oprah Winfrey

John McCain:_____Paris Hilton

Must be a message in there somewhere?

Racism?

When has Paris Hilton endorsed John McCain? If this is in reference to the spoof, I don't see that as an "endorsement" by any stretch of the imagination. I view it as her disapproval of his using of her in the ad. She remained neutral, or supportive, which ever way you want to look at it, of both candidates in regard to the one issue she brought up which was the fuel crisis.

means I was joking. Playing into the feelings of those that see racism everywhere.

I knew you were joking. That wasn't why I asked. It was due to the quote by BW in your post about Paris "endorsing" John McCain. I've seen no evidence of.



Citizens of the USA are feel to make monetary contributions to any or all political parties. This is not an uncommon practice in order to remain neutral publicly. It's the vote that counts and that is private. Donating the maximum amount allowed by law to a political candidate is NOT endorsement. The maximum is only $2300, so it's not like it's gonna break the bank to donate. I hardly think $2300 tells who one will actually vote for.