Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues
Guest
 

Re: rants for or against circumcision.

Postby Guest on Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:23 pm

Emily B wrote: So the endless ranting here still has no impact on womens' feelings about circumcision. In addition to the diseases harboured by foreskins, we can now add the cheesy smell as one other reason to do away with the nasty bit on the end.


Emily, depending on time and circumstance, it's just possible that the nasty bit on the end might sometimes be you!

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 17844
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Re: Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Postby The Colonel on Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:58 am

I agree with the above guest who says she/he needs banning.

She/he is just a nasty troll, who is not contributing to this thread at all, but posting irrelevant rubbish.
ריאן, מיכאל, מת 'יו, אנדרו, אדם ורוברט.

User avatar
Polgara69
Wizard
 
Posts: 1469
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: high status

Postby Polgara69 on Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:16 am

Emily B wrote:
The Colonel wrote:I don't think you can so easily insult someone who is highly educated, of high status . . .


Colonel, I always been puzzled why you are so sensitive about readers telling you to take your cheesey knob & bong off. Now I see why. In your own view (quoted above), you see yourself as "highly educated, of high status". That explains a great deal about your sense of entitlement to this issue, your sense that you should be controlling the discussion. However, we on the other side, do claim to have an interest in this topic if for no other reason than we are expected to be thrilled to share the experience whenever the lord decides to wave his cheesey sausage about the place. For what it's worth, we in turn have a right to ask men to have dealt with, and solved, their cheesey-ness by the time they decide to share the experience. As most of the world (except England and Ukraine perhaps) recognises, circumcision is the prettiest and sweetest solution to this ancient, smelly problem. Being of "high status" doesn't give you a free pass to brow-beat women into silence. The ladies have a right to ask the gentleman if he's been been circumcised before pursuing the relationship![/quote]

I have to agree there. We can have a preference just as you can have a preference for women who have had breast augmentation or botox. Its the same thing really and while (as I have said numerous times so dont go there) I dont agree with wholesale circumcision of babies, if the man is cicumcised thru his own choice (for whatever reason) then that creates a choice for women to prefer it or not. If things dont work out with me and toyboy then, yes, Im gonna be asking cos I dont want to go back to non circumcised. And I dont care if the bloke is the man of my dreams cos I wont be around long enough to find out so I wont know what Im missing! Call me shallow all you like I dont care but now I have a preference thanks to a man and that is my choice my friend.
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 17844
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Re: high status

Postby The Colonel on Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:59 pm

Emily B wrote:
The Colonel wrote:I don't think you can so easily insult someone who is highly educated, of high status . . .


Colonel, I always been puzzled why you are so sensitive about readers telling you to take your cheesey knob & bong off. Now I see why. In your own view (quoted above), you see yourself as "highly educated, of high status". That explains a great deal about your sense of entitlement to this issue, your sense that you should be controlling the discussion. However, we on the other side, do claim to have an interest in this topic if for no other reason than we are expected to be thrilled to share the experience whenever the lord decides to wave his cheesey sausage about the place. For what it's worth, we in turn have a right to ask men to have dealt with, and solved, their cheesey-ness by the time they decide to share the experience. As most of the world (except England and Ukraine perhaps) recognises, circumcision is the prettiest and sweetest solution to this ancient, smelly problem. Being of "high status" doesn't give you a free pass to brow-beat women into silence. The ladies have a right to ask the gentleman if he's been been circumcised before pursuing the relationship!


The whole of EUROPE doesn't circumcise you fuckwit.

And you know nothing about my knob either retard.

Admins - I ask kindly for this troll to be banned. He/she causes a lot trouble here and I am going to flag all her posts.
ריאן, מיכאל, מת 'יו, אנדרו, אדם ורוברט.

User avatar
franfran
Supernatural Poster
 
Posts: 10235
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:18 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: high status

Postby franfran on Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:52 pm

Emily B wrote:As most of the world (except England and Ukraine perhaps) recognises, circumcision is the prettiest and sweetest solution to this ancient, smelly problem.


I would have thought the best solution to this problem was a bar of soap!
Image

"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality." (Mikhail Bakunin 1814 - 1876)

Emily B
 

Re: high status

Postby Emily B on Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:53 am

The Colonel wrote:Admins - I ask kindly for this troll to be banned. He/she causes a lot trouble here and I am going to flag all her posts.


Well now, aren't we getting into a high-class snit! The large elderly male troll of "elevated status" is trying to take over a ladies' thread by throwing his bossy self about the place, asking to have rude old ladies banned! Has this now become a men-only club, where only the men are admitted - as long as they're uncircumcised?

Colonel, dear, are you afraid of what the old ladies have to say on this topic?

User avatar
Polgara69
Wizard
 
Posts: 1469
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: high status

Postby Polgara69 on Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:43 am

franfran wrote:
Emily B wrote:As most of the world (except England and Ukraine perhaps) recognises, circumcision is the prettiest and sweetest solution to this ancient, smelly problem.


I would have thought the best solution to this problem was a bar of soap!


If it were that simple Fran then there wouldnt be an argument about it. Even 10 mins after washing thoroughly it starts to smell a bit musty. After toyboy has been at work all day I would have no objections about whipping it out and having a good go but with the ex...not a chance in hell. And yes, while smegma is a natural thing the willy produces to protect it, that is no excuse for having a head full of it. That just means you aint washed it for a week and, as I have pointed out before, if anyone here wants to flick it out of thier teeth after a blowjob you might appreciate what (some) of us ladies are on about.
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb

User avatar
J.A.G
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: 60Km west of London.

Re: Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Postby J.A.G on Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:47 am

Emily B, lets just for one moment take you seriously and give you the respect any individual deserves and lets look at the original post..

Surely this is just a matter of cleanliness and circumsised men are not necessarily any cleaner than those who are not.. so if the issue is a question of you preferring circumsised men, then so be it but I would imagine that if you dislike uncleany willies, that you also dislike bad breath and smelly feet and for me a person who is unclean is unclean..

If I was to flip the gender roles around, I have met women that have had a very strong vaginal odur but for me to suggest that this is anything other than a matter of hormones and or cleanliness would be out of order and to suggest that a woman who has larger labia ought to surgically change things as it might help her in the clean department would be totally outrageous and disrespectful..

So maybe the subject matter here has two threads, unclean people engaging and presenting themselves for sexual engagement and the other being a preference for circumsised men..
No bollocks, no bullshit.. as it comes..

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 17844
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Re: high status

Postby The Colonel on Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:30 pm

Polgara69 wrote:
franfran wrote:
Emily B wrote:As most of the world (except England and Ukraine perhaps) recognises, circumcision is the prettiest and sweetest solution to this ancient, smelly problem.


I would have thought the best solution to this problem was a bar of soap!


If it were that simple Fran then there wouldnt be an argument about it. Even 10 mins after washing thoroughly it starts to smell a bit musty. After toyboy has been at work all day I would have no objections about whipping it out and having a good go but with the ex...not a chance in hell. And yes, while smegma is a natural thing the willy produces to protect it, that is no excuse for having a head full of it. That just means you aint washed it for a week and, as I have pointed out before, if anyone here wants to flick it out of thier teeth after a blowjob you might appreciate what (some) of us ladies are on about.


That is not strictly true. A clean man is a clean man.

I reported Emily B's post once again. And the fuckwit doesn't even realise I'm circumcised she's so dense. :roll:

I expect, it is a member trolling actually.
ריאן, מיכאל, מת 'יו, אנדרו, אדם ורוברט.

User avatar
Polgara69
Wizard
 
Posts: 1469
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Postby Polgara69 on Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:24 pm

Colonel, if I may be so bold, how old were you when you had it done? Not just being nosey, there is a reason I ask. PM me if you dont it being held against you!
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb

Emily B
 

Re: high status

Postby Emily B on Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:46 am

The Colonel wrote: And the fuckwit doesn't even realise I'm circumcised she's so dense. :roll: I expect, it is a member trolling actually.


As we can plainly see, Colonel Sausage (of "high status") is unable to carry on a reasonable discussion with a bunch of ladies without resorting to insults and name calling, with some giant self-promoting banners and logos thrown in for emphasis! But the ladies won't be bullied!

As for the "bar of soap" defense, It's been repeatedly posted here over the last several eons, that circumcision is not just a simple matter of presenting a sweet-smelling self to one's partner. Circumcision is a life-and-death health matter, and always has been ever since woman first discovered that a clean healthy dick promotes a liftetime of family togetherness. A scruffy, smelly foreskin also harbours disease (warts, HIV, for example) and a woman who anticipates a lifetime of electrifying orgasmic shagging needs to take an active interest in the health and attractiveness of her mate's member. There's a reason that ancient cultures who value having lots of babies (Jews, Americans, & Muslims, for example) always standardize on circumcision. It makes for exciting baby-making. And, even after the baby-making's done, there's still lots of lovely shagging in old age - as long as his dick remains healthy and bug-free. Old people, who still enjoy a good shag, can't cope with infected foreskins. It takes more than just a bar of soap.

Nobody is required to be circumcised. It's truly a matter of choice. But the circumcised will have twice the number of children and way more orgasms much further into old age than the untrimmed lot and they'll likely die with a smile on their face after squeezing in "just one more time". I would think that any man who enjoys being a man would rather his heart gave out before his dick. But, for the life of me, I just can't imagine how Mrs. Colonel puts up with his highness's endless pompous ranting on this topic. It's bad enough that we have to deal with it here, but it must be utterly unbearable in person. But the proof of the sausage is in the shagging, which explains that since the Colonel is circumcised, that's why he has so many children, regardless of what a high-status twit he is otherwise! A handsome circumcised dick overcomes a lot of other serious shortcomings. I rest my case.

User avatar
J.A.G
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: 60Km west of London.

Re: high status

Postby J.A.G on Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:33 am

Emily B wrote:. As for the "bar of soap" defense, It's been repeatedly posted here over the last several eons, that circumcision is not just a simple matter of presenting a sweet-smelling self to one's partner. Circumcision is a life-and-death health matter, and always has been ever since woman first discovered that a clean healthy dick promotes a liftetime of family togetherness.

Nobody is required to be circumcised. It's truly a matter of choice. But the circumcised will have twice the number of children and way more orgasms much further into old age than the untrimmed lot and they'll likely die with a smile on their face after squeezing in "just one more time".

Emily you are full of so much rubbish.. where is your proof..I have never heard so much tosh in all my life..

Circumsision is not a matter of life or death for men or women.. The bottom line is a man is either clean or not clean. Unitl my 42nd birthday I had a foreskin and never once, not even as a little boy, did I ever have a problem cleaning myself and that was with a foreskin that could not retract.

As for the baby making bollocks, I come from a family of big numbers, where circumsision was not the norm and on average my family elders had between 8 - 20 children and even my father (irresponsible as he was) had 43.. so please if you are gonna post crap post it on a subject that you know something about..

The fact the you choose to sleep with unclean men is your choice but coming here and spreading your rubbish as if you really know what you are talking about is daft, because it is clear your stereotypical generalistaions are making you look silly.

I will still argue that a man who has an unclean penis probably has other unclean habits and for such a man to present himself for sex with another is a reflection on him not his uncut penis..

When a woman has a vaginal ordur it is not because she has excess skin on her vaginia, hormones aside, it is nearly always because she has not washed herself properly, heck I have known women that when they get up from a clothed seat, leave a trace of their person behind..

If you are gonna argue, put your dislike of certain forum members to one side, get your facts straight and argue.. at least I for one will respect what you are saying a little bit more, until then you've lost my respect on this equation because you are just making up stuff to promote your dislike of the subject matter..
No bollocks, no bullshit.. as it comes..

User avatar
Polgara69
Wizard
 
Posts: 1469
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: high status

Postby Polgara69 on Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:39 am

J.A.G wrote:
Emily B wrote:. As for the "bar of soap" defense, It's been repeatedly posted here over the last several eons, that circumcision is not just a simple matter of presenting a sweet-smelling self to one's partner. Circumcision is a life-and-death health matter, and always has been ever since woman first discovered that a clean healthy dick promotes a liftetime of family togetherness.

Nobody is required to be circumcised. It's truly a matter of choice. But the circumcised will have twice the number of children and way more orgasms much further into old age than the untrimmed lot and they'll likely die with a smile on their face after squeezing in "just one more time".

Emily you are full of so much rubbish.. where is your proof..I have never heard so much tosh in all my life..

Circumsision is not a matter of life or death for men or women.. The bottom line is a man is either clean or not clean. Unitl my 42nd birthday I had a foreskin and never once, not even as a little boy, did I ever have a problem cleaning myself and that was with a foreskin that could not retract.

As for the baby making bollocks, I come from a family of big numbers, where circumsision was not the norm and on average my family elders had between 8 - 20 children and even my father (irresponsible as he was) had 43.. so please if you are gonna post crap post it on a subject that you know something about..

The fact the you choose to sleep with unclean men is your choice but coming here and spreading your rubbish as if you really know what you are talking about is daft, because it is clear your stereotypical generalistaions are making you look silly.

I will still argue that a man who has an unclean penis probably has other unclean habits and for such a man to present himself for sex with another is a reflection on him not his uncut penis..

When a woman has a vaginal ordur it is not because she has excess skin on her vaginia, hormones aside, it is nearly always because she has not washed herself properly, heck I have known women that when they get up from a clothed seat, leave a trace of their person behind..

If you are gonna argue, put your dislike of certain forum members to one side, get your facts straight and argue.. at least I for one will respect what you are saying a little bit more, until then you've lost my respect on this equation because you are just making up stuff to promote your dislike of the subject matter..


With how many women? He must be a walking infection! How proud you must be!
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb

User avatar
J.A.G
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: 60Km west of London.

Re: Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Postby J.A.G on Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:04 pm

POLGARA69.. you are straying from the topic and missing the point but for your information it was with his 2 wives over a period of 87 yrs.. so no infections and no need for you to say how proud I must be.. I guess you and Emily B are cut from the same cloth as you are not staying on topic or dealing with anything you actually know.. looks like no respect for you either..
No bollocks, no bullshit.. as it comes..

User avatar
Polgara69
Wizard
 
Posts: 1469
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Postby Polgara69 on Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:16 pm

*Coughs..bullshit...Coughs*
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb

PreviousNext

Return to Sex Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest