Men, post your rants for or against circumcision.

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues

Moderator: Silent One

Postby J.A.G » Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:55 pm

On medical grounds, I was circumcised at 43. My then g’friend had the opportunity of really telling people as it was, as we had been together for over a year at that stage and stayed together for another 18mths.

The whole hygiene issue is a load of RUBBISH. A man is either clean or he is not. I was unable to retract before my op and maintain 100% cleanliness, freshness etc all my life, WHY? Because I took care of myself daily, bi-daily or tri-daily if I thought it need be. If your unclean you are unclean regardless to whether you are intact or not.

NOW as an adult, I will say this. THERE IS NO NEED ON THIS PLANET to subject any child to the pain that I went through for 14 months [post op]. All this talk about a baby won’t feel it or its not so sensitive is RUBBISH.

You can STOP all of this RUBBISH about tradition and culture. It is a BRUTAL mutilation that has become very fashionable. It is torture to the body. I had mine done because I needed to have it done. I am telling it straight here cos no baby can come to this thread and tell it for real like I AM HERE.

I believe that it has made zero difference to hygiene. BUT it has allowed me to gain better blood flow and thus achieve an even bigger erection [about 15-20mm]. It never looked bad before [I am bound to say that] but yes, it does look better now. I was always able to maintain an erection for silly amounts of time before, I still can and maybe even longer now, though it is much less sensitive which means oral sex can be tiresome for your lady.

Sex from my then g’friend’s point of view.. It was different [my attitude mainly], not better just different for she felt it was always good before, so my attitude to her pleasure did not change if anything I wanted to show off once I got it working again.

I get concerned about women who say that they would not go out with a man that is not cut,, I would never say that I would not go out with a woman who had not had some form of sexual cosmetic surgery and that is just what this is at birth,, PURE COSMETIC SURGERY where a child has no choice.

But if like me, you have to have it done, then it has to be done. I put it off for years but it had to be done..

I can walk straight now.. looking back I have to laugh at myself.. but it did hurt..and that's no kidding.
User avatar
J.A.G
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: 60Km west of London.

Re: Chop it off?

Postby The Colonel » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:42 pm

The Lieutenant Colonel wrote:
Anon wrote:OMG COLONELS GONNA CIRCUMCISE EM!


THE TRUTH COMES OUT! HE'S GOING TO CHOP IT OFF! THE COLONEL'S A HYPOCRITE!


I haven't said either way.
The Colonel
 

Oh! The agony! The sufferation!

Postby Andrew MacKay » Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:50 am

J.A.G wrote: I was circumcised at 43. It is torture to the body. I had mine done because I needed to have it done. . . it does look better now.
I get concerned about women who say that they would not go out with a man that is not cut . . . I would never say that I would not go out with a woman who had not had some form of sexual cosmetic surgery . . . But if like me, you have to have it done, then it has to be done. I put it off for years but it had to be done. . . I can walk straight now . . .


What a whiner! It looks like you just like to go on and on about stuff. I'm surprised you didn't squeeze some global warming into your rant! Wouldn't it have been easier to have had it done at birth? Then you wouldn't have to struggle with all this public angst. Oh! The agony! The sufferation!
Andrew MacKay
 

Postby J.A.G » Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:55 am

Andrew it would be so much easier to just ignore you.. so I shall, after all the thread is titled.. "post your rants or raves".
Last edited by J.A.G on Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
J.A.G
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: 60Km west of London.

Postby The Colonel » Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:53 am

J.A.G wrote:Andrew it would be so much easier to just ignore you.. so I shall.


Ignore the trolls. It's a stupid troll woman - you'll get used to her eventually. You end up laughing at her in time. (Don't be fooled by the name - she's a female!)
The Colonel
 

Knob cheese

Postby Andrew MacKay » Tue Oct 14, 2008 4:59 am

J.A.G wrote:Andrew it would be so much easier to just ignore you.. so I shall, after all the thread is titled.. "post your rants or raves".


So we're free to rant as much as we like, then. What I'd like to rant about is the notion expressed in the poll that women might be repelled by knob cheese. This suggests that women in particular are overly sensitive to brevibacterium linens, the bacteria which causes body odour. It's true that men host huge quantities of brevibacterium linens, much more so than women, and women are not always attracted to the odour. The really pungent male bits are unwashed armpits, smelly feet and sweaty foreskins. Coincidentally, the same bacterium that makes for smelly guys is also responsible for the fermentation of limburger cheese, which is why knob cheese and limburger smell the same. This is probably the real reason that women are repelled by knob cheese (and limburger), and why they prefer trimmed dicks. Now here's my question: if women are repelled by knob cheese because it smells like men's body odour, are gays attracted to knob cheese for the same reason? That might explain why so many gays are here vigorously defending foreskins. Just a guess, mind you.
Andrew MacKay
 

Postby The Colonel » Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:32 pm

What a load of rubbish.

The above poster was the former guest poster Emily B.
The Colonel
 

Postby J.A.G » Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Andrew, I personally might have taken you more seriously if your original post had not quoted my words. By doing so I was bound to wonder what the heck you are on about.

I have made no comment about "knobcheese", mainly necause I, like most men who wash themselves properly, have NEVER had it, not even as a little boy.

Now if you want to rant, and that is fine by me, make your quotes applicable to your rant, or at least seperate your rants, so that they are properly addressed.

If The Colonel is correct, that you are an ex female poster now masquerading as someone else, then your credability and your conversation is further lost on men, like myself, who have no time for such childish behaviour..

But it is an open forum and maybe you do not feel able to be yourself, even with a computer screen to hide your false identity.. it does not take to much common sense to recognise that no man would write in the style that you have for even if you were a man and had the views that you do, you would according to your presentable psychological profile here, just hide yourself away and keep your mouth shut.. maybe next time a new member joins, you may care to first checkout their profile to at least see what you are setting yourself up for.. of course that requires them to be open and honest about who they are.. and that might seem strange to you.. never the less if you are a woman, I will not hold your comments as representive of the stupidity often seen by some of your likeminded sister.
No bollocks, no bullshit.. as it comes..
User avatar
J.A.G
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: 60Km west of London.

Re: Knob cheese

Postby The Colonel » Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:00 pm

Andrew MacKay wrote:Now here's my question: if women are repelled by knob cheese because it smells like men's body odour, are gays attracted to knob cheese for the same reason? That might explain why so many gays are here vigorously defending foreskins. Just a guess, mind you.


There are no gay posters here.

This ignorant comment was also made by Emily B.

Gay people do not defend foreskins. People who are opposed to subjecting unconsenting infants to circumcision defend foreskins and choice.

Now get lost.
The Colonel
 

Postby Guest » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:16 pm

COLONEL ARE YOU GOING TO CIRCUMCISE THEM OR NOT?
Guest
 

Postby The Colonel » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:59 pm

. wrote:COLONEL ARE YOU GOING TO CIRCUMCISE THEM OR NOT?


Yes. :D
The Colonel
 

Postby Colonels Circumcised Sons » Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:46 pm

I KNEW IT!
Colonels Circumcised Sons
 

Postby missinformed » Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:22 pm

I don't think men should have to be circumcised for a woman's sake anymore than a woman should feel obliged to have a boob job because her man prefers bigger tits really.

Circumcised c***s are so much nicer though. :D
User avatar
missinformed
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:41 am
Location: England

Postby Guest » Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:47 pm

missinformed wrote:I don't think men should have to be circumcised for a woman's sake anymore than a woman should feel obliged to have a boob job because her man prefers bigger tits really.

Circumcised c***s are so much nicer though. :D


totally agree

i won't go with a man who isn't cut down below
Guest
 

Postby The Colonel » Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:07 pm

. wrote:
missinformed wrote:I don't think men should have to be circumcised for a woman's sake anymore than a woman should feel obliged to have a boob job because her man prefers bigger tits really.

Circumcised c***s are so much nicer though. :D


totally agree

i won't go with a man who isn't cut down below


You're an ignorant fool then aren't you?
The Colonel
 

PreviousNext

Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests