MicKKKey assaulted someone in Namibia??

[Guest]

He did not beat someone up in Namibia, false report.

He did not beat up parent's in India.

He grabbed a pap by the neck, personally I thought it was great!

He was not present when the other India 'racist bully' lies about him were said. Not there!

Keep em coming, almost all are lies, happy to refute here.

If you think that choking someone is great, then that says a lot about you.

Oh puhleeze, go over to TMZ and watch it. It is a 1 second grab, I shouldn't even use the word choking. The guy was fine after as you would know if you watched it. And I don't mean the video where they replayed instantly back to back so it looks longer, I mean the real one at TMZ. You guys are too much, do yo know what the paps do to celebs? This guy deserved worst and I don't care who the f u c k he was stalking.

So you think violent behaviour is great? Been watching Wanted a little too much? Violent behaviour is never acceptable, whether its from the paps or the bodyguards.

[Guest]

That pap that Mickey choked in India (and got caught on tape while doing it) had nothing to do with Brangelina. He was no way near them. Mickey attacked him for no reason.

Trying to excuse him for that is ridiculous and stupid. If he had no problems choking someone, he sure as hell would have no problem beating someone up.

Not at that moment. But...where was he all week before the choking?

Who? Mickey? He was always around back then. But after India, he is almost never seen.

Choking someone is not acceptable.

I am talking about the paps guy. What was he doing all week before the choking. And save the unacceptable parent talk. I do not think choking is something great. I do think that all you high and mighty people here are denying that you too think it was great to see a pap get some S*** back for once. Admit it, it was funny.

[Guest]

That pap that Mickey choked in India (and got caught on tape while doing it) had nothing to do with Brangelina. He was no way near them. Mickey attacked him for no reason.

Trying to excuse him for that is ridiculous and stupid. If he had no problems choking someone, he sure as hell would have no problem beating someone up.

Not at that moment. But...where was he all week before the choking?

Who? Mickey? He was always around back then. But after India, he is almost never seen.

Choking someone is not acceptable.

I am talking about the paps guy. What was he doing all week before the choking. And save the unacceptable parent talk. I do not think choking is something great. I do think that all you high and mighty people here are denying that you too think it was great to see a pap get some S*** back for once. Admit it, it was funny.

Yes, choking people is hilarious.... Seek help!

[Guest]

So you think violent behaviour is great? Been watching Wanted a little too much? Violent behaviour is never acceptable, whether its from the paps or the bodyguards.

More parent talk, I think that this pap got what he had coming. It isn't just a pap getting grabbed for a second. Yo are ignoring the back story and all of you are.
Do I think 'choking' people is the way to go? no but I did find it damn amusing that this obnoxious name calling hotel breaking in weasel that goes around taunting people and asking for it gets it! If you knew what an obnoxious as s hole this guy was then you would too.
Drop the parent talk I know you thought it was funny too

[Guest]

Choke choke choke, get a grip and learn what a choke is, geesh

bbl

[Tigerina]

Yeah I remember when Micky beat up an innocent person in Namibia. Jolie bought off the authorities at the airport as they were preparing to leave the country, allowing the big ape to get away with assult on an innocent victim. I remember how quickly it was brushed under the rug and they didn't want the press about it since Jolie is suppose to be some great humanitarian who had no clue it wasn't about the money for the victim, but about his dignity. How can she be the great humanitarian she claims if she doesn't understand the first thing about a person dignity? She claims refuges are treated badly and attacked for no reason and she has body guard who should be kept on a leash and attacks anyone who dare look at him in the wrong way.

She is a hypocrite in everything she does. It is digusting that her groupies think he was justified to use force on these people. I would bet the people who use violence against the refuges feel entitled to it as well.

Jolie is WRONG! If she were a true leader, humanitarian, instead of paying off the police in Namibia, she should of made him stay there and stand trial for his actions. More of the same from this skank, she doesn't begin to practice what she preaches.

Oh and the man he attacked in India, while she is making a movie about the rights of a journalist. What a joke she is.

[Guest]

Yeah I remember when Micky beat up an innocent person in Namibia. Jolie bought off the authorities at the airport as they were preparing to leave the country, allowing the big ape to get away with assult on an innocent victim. I remember how quickly it was brushed under the rug and they didn't want the press about it since Jolie is suppose to be some great humanitarian who had no clue it wasn't about the money for the victim, but about his dignity. How can she be the great humanitarian she claims if she doesn't understand the first thing about a person dignity? She claims refuges are treated badly and attacked for no reason and she has body guard who should be kept on a leash and attacks anyone who dare look at him in the wrong way.

She is a hypocrite in everything she does. It is digusting that her groupies think he was justified to use force on these people. I would bet the people who use violence against the refuges feel entitled to it as well.

Jolie is WRONG! If she were a true leader, humanitarian, instead of paying off the police in Namibia, she should of made him stay there and stand trial for his actions. More of the same from this skank, she doesn't begin to practice what she preaches.

Oh and the man he attacked in India, while she is making a movie about the rights of a journalist. What a joke she is.

Back on the movie set in India, one of the security guards actually drew a gun on a journalist who was there to meet with Jolie. He was not a random trespassing pap.

[Guest]

Jolie employs terrorists. An employee's actions may, legally, be attributed to his employer through the legal principle of "respondeat superior."

The reason why you don't see Mikkey around anymore is because if Jolie gets sued for something Mikkey does, she won't be able to now say that she was unaware of his propensity toward violence. It is well documented and anyone attacked by Mikkey in the future would end up owning the Jolie/Pitt circus.

[Guest]

Now we know where Maddox and the RAD kid are learning their thug tactics from.

[fayet37]

That man is a bully!





[code:1]OMG![/code:1]

[Guest]

Jolie employs terrorists. An employee's actions may, legally, be attributed to his employer through the legal principle of "respondeat superior."

The reason why you don't see Mikkey around anymore is because if Jolie gets sued for something Mikkey does, she won't be able to now say that she was unaware of his propensity toward violence. It is well documented and anyone attacked by Mikkey in the future would end up owning the Jolie/Pitt circus.

Hasn't he been seen in France with her? In the posed pictures that were taken from a supposed helicopter?

[Guest]

The guy that Mickey assaulted wasn't a pap, he was a British reporter. Here's a link with a short clip of it:
http://www.celebitchy.com/1866/angelina_and_brads_bodyguard_chokes_a_photographer_includes_video/

Plus, you get many pictures of Jolie b*tching during that rickshaw ride.

[Guest]

Three of their bodyguards was also arrested for the school incident in India:
http://www.bloggernews.net/12207

[fayet37]

Jolie employs terrorists. An employee's actions may, legally, be attributed to his employer through the legal principle of "respondeat superior."

The reason why you don't see Mikkey around anymore is because if Jolie gets sued for something Mikkey does, she won't be able to now say that she was unaware of his propensity toward violence. It is well documented and anyone attacked by Mikkey in the future would end up owning the Jolie/Pitt circus.

Hasn't he been seen in France with her? In the posed pictures that were taken from a supposed helicopter?

I think that was him on the one photo when they were in the yard. (The one where Zee is hauling axx across the patio, and there's a blure of what is supposedly Jolie walking around.)

[Guest]

Is this MicKKKey?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/26/intouch_angelina_2.jpg