MicKKKey assaulted someone in Namibia??

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Tigerina
Chat Merchant
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:10 am

Postby Tigerina on Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:59 pm

The guy that Mickey assaulted wasn't a pap, he was a British reporter.


I bet Daniel Pearl rolled over in his grave with that one. And here, these are the people who are representing his life story. :?

What about the businessman who was beat up in Namibia? After a while, when trouble like this follows someone around, you have to wonder where the real problem lies. Sounds to me like Mickey is lacking in public relations. Go figure, leadership reflects attitude. :(

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:00 pm

Tigerina wrote:
The guy that Mickey assaulted wasn't a pap, he was a British reporter.


I bet Daniel Pearl rolled over in his grave with that one. And here, these are the people who are representing his life story. :?

What about the businessman who was beat up in Namibia? After a while, when trouble like this follows someone around, you have to wonder where the real problem lies. Sounds to me like Mickey is lacking in public relations. Go figure, leadership reflects attitude. :(


Jolie probably gets off on that type of violence.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:16 am

. wrote:
Tigerina wrote:
The guy that Mickey assaulted wasn't a pap, he was a British reporter.


I bet Daniel Pearl rolled over in his grave with that one. And here, these are the people who are representing his life story. :?

What about the businessman who was beat up in Namibia? After a while, when trouble like this follows someone around, you have to wonder where the real problem lies. Sounds to me like Mickey is lacking in public relations. Go figure, leadership reflects attitude. :(


Jolie probably gets off on that type of violence.


Just like she got off on killing her pets when she was a kid, and just like she gets off on her kids beating each other up.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:08 am

. wrote:That pap that Mickey choked in India (and got caught on tape while doing it) had nothing to do with Brangelina. He was no way near them. Mickey attacked him for no reason.

Trying to excuse him for that is ridiculous and stupid. If he had no problems choking someone, he sure as hell would have no problem beating someone up.



Was the case ever closed on his murder charges?????

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:20 am

Mikkey can't come to the US because as a former felon & murder suspect the US goverment wont give him a visa.

Tigerina
Chat Merchant
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:10 am

Postby Tigerina on Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:37 am

Nice influence to have around her children. :? :shock:

He was accused of murder or convicted of it??

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:43 am

. wrote:The guy that Mickey assaulted wasn't a pap, he was a British reporter. Here's a link with a short clip of it:
http://www.celebitchy.com/1866/angelina_and_brads_bodyguard_chokes_a_photographer_includes_video/

Plus, you get many pictures of Jolie b*tching during that rickshaw ride. :lol:


Pap! Don't you know they are all "reporter's"? duh

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:45 am

. wrote:
Tigerina wrote:Yeah I remember when Micky beat up an innocent person in Namibia. Jolie bought off the authorities at the airport as they were preparing to leave the country, allowing the big ape to get away with assult on an innocent victim. I remember how quickly it was brushed under the rug and they didn't want the press about it since Jolie is suppose to be some great humanitarian who had no clue it wasn't about the money for the victim, but about his dignity. How can she be the great humanitarian she claims if she doesn't understand the first thing about a person dignity? She claims refuges are treated badly and attacked for no reason and she has body guard who should be kept on a leash and attacks anyone who dare look at him in the wrong way. :twisted:

She is a hypocrite in everything she does. It is digusting that her groupies think he was justified to use force on these people. I would bet the people who use violence against the refuges feel entitled to it as well.

Jolie is WRONG! If she were a true leader, humanitarian, instead of paying off the police in Namibia, she should of made him stay there and stand trial for his actions. More of the same from this skank, she doesn't begin to practice what she preaches. :x

Oh and the man he attacked in India, while she is making a movie about the rights of a journalist. :roll: What a joke she is.


Back on the movie set in India, one of the security guards actually drew a gun on a journalist who was there to meet with Jolie. He was not a random trespassing pap.


Not Mickey.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:46 am

. wrote:Jolie employs terrorists. An employee's actions may, legally, be attributed to his employer through the legal principle of "respondeat superior."

The reason why you don't see Mikkey around anymore is because if Jolie gets sued for something Mikkey does, she won't be able to now say that she was unaware of his propensity toward violence. It is well documented and anyone attacked by Mikkey in the future would end up owning the Jolie/Pitt circus.


Not true.
Documented? Let's see it.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:48 am

. wrote:Three of their bodyguards was also arrested for the school incident in India:
http://www.bloggernews.net/12207


Arrested and released as it was a false report of an incident that did not involve Mickey at all. He wasn't there.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:49 am

. wrote:Mikkey can't come to the US because as a former felon & murder suspect the US goverment wont give him a visa.


Not true. Not a felon and not the reason.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:50 am

Tigerina wrote:
The guy that Mickey assaulted wasn't a pap, he was a British reporter.


I bet Daniel Pearl rolled over in his grave with that one. And here, these are the people who are representing his life story. :?

What about the businessman who was beat up in Namibia? After a while, when trouble like this follows someone around, you have to wonder where the real problem lies. Sounds to me like Mickey is lacking in public relations. Go figure, leadership reflects attitude. :(


Again, see above posts. Never happened, if it did it was NOT Mickey. Not

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:52 am

Tigerina wrote:Nice influence to have around her children. :? :shock:

He was accused of murder or convicted of it??


Arrested and released when there was no evidence he was involved. The case is closed as 2 others were convicted. All dropped against him ages ago.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:54 am

fayet37 wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:Jolie employs terrorists. An employee's actions may, legally, be attributed to his employer through the legal principle of "respondeat superior."

The reason why you don't see Mikkey around anymore is because if Jolie gets sued for something Mikkey does, she won't be able to now say that she was unaware of his propensity toward violence. It is well documented and anyone attacked by Mikkey in the future would end up owning the Jolie/Pitt circus.


Hasn't he been seen in France with her? In the posed pictures that were taken from a supposed helicopter?



I think that was him on the one photo when they were in the yard. (The one where Zee is hauling axx across the patio, and there's a blure of what is supposedly Jolie walking around.)


Not him in France.

BTW, the kids love him, haven't you seen the pictures?? Poor Brad will never get that much love from them.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:40 pm

. wrote:
fayet37 wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:Jolie employs terrorists. An employee's actions may, legally, be attributed to his employer through the legal principle of "respondeat superior."

The reason why you don't see Mikkey around anymore is because if Jolie gets sued for something Mikkey does, she won't be able to now say that she was unaware of his propensity toward violence. It is well documented and anyone attacked by Mikkey in the future would end up owning the Jolie/Pitt circus.


Hasn't he been seen in France with her? In the posed pictures that were taken from a supposed helicopter?



I think that was him on the one photo when they were in the yard. (The one where Zee is hauling axx across the patio, and there's a blure of what is supposedly Jolie walking around.)


Not him in France.

BTW, the kids love him, haven't you seen the pictures?? Poor Brad will never get that much love from them.


True that. There are photos of Pax getting foot rides from Mickey and another of Shiloh with her head turned smiling at Mickey as he waves to her while her mother is seat belting her into to an SUV in Prague.

I think Mickey has a short fuse and that Brad and Angelina should be held responsible for his actions. They must approve of his violence since they continue to rehire him.

PreviousNext

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ambivalent, jinxrox and 15 guests