Celebrity News...
  1. Michael Jackson's fan album
  2. Nicole Kidman's baby awe
  3. Jennifer Garner's baby joy
  4. Kate Moss' Express jet
Entertainment...
  1. Peet apologises for ‘parasite‘ comment
  2. Police submit tape of ‘Brolin brawl’
  3. Dick posts bail after arrest for sexual battery
  4. Police 'professional' During Brolin Arrest.
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
Abortion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Politics And Social Issues

Pro Choice Or Pro Life?
I Am Pro Choice
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
I Am Pro Life
30%
 30%  [ 6 ]
I Am Personally Pro Life, But Support Choice
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
Other
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 20

Author Message
The Colonel
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 6926
Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobin wrote:
Fred75 wrote:

God designed the vagina for the penis.


the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.


Your argument fails.

There is no creator until proven such.
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 853


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. you are probably correct in your philosophical assessment --- i clearly see now after reading your post, that the mouth also eliminates the waste of the brain and, in the process, spews out S*** in all directions, as your comments directed at me personally clearly indicate.


Cute…but a non sequitar.

Quote:
and for what it's worth, if you want to know anything about me, go read the health forum on this site. the only reason i even participate here is to answer questions anyone who has a health related issue, particularily teens who are sometimes hesitant to talk to their parents or a doctor.


I have personally noted your expertise and contribution medical matters. It’s just that the hard sciences often pretend to mask as philosophers, and they are no more qualified then your average ditch-digger. My own father was a cardiologist and professor of medicine at Harvard University, but he had the ignorance of a stone when it came to matters of politics.

I don’t suggest that as a simile for you, but likewise I'm not going to let you get away with the same bulls*** on a public forum.
Back to top
Bobin
FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 252


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

reductio ad absurdum
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 853


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other's time, anymore.

Last edited by Cambridge on Sun May 11, 2008 10:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Bobin
FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 252


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cambridge wrote:
Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.


sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 853


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobin wrote:
Cambridge wrote:
Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.


sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.


Just make sure they are physiological questions, and not questions that demand thought.
Back to top
Bobin
FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 252


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cambridge wrote:
Bobin wrote:
Cambridge wrote:
Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.


sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.


Just make sure they are physiological questions, and not questions that demand thought.


you definately are a piece of work.
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 853


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once again, a non sequitar. (Don't split your infinitive or minigirl will get you.) Laughing Laughing
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 12068
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cambridge, What side of NYC do you reside on?
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 853


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZiaAries wrote:
Cambridge, What side of NYC do you reside on?


The far west side, zia. I live in Marin County, and my practice is in San Francisco. Very Happy


Last edited by Cambridge on Sun May 11, 2008 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
The Colonel
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 6926
Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cambridge wrote:
Bobin wrote:
Cambridge wrote:
Impotent nonsence. Let's not waste each other time, anymore.


sure. you go argue with the colonel and i'll go back to answering questions.


Just make sure they are physiological questions, and not questions that demand thought.


I don't believe I have ever argued with Cambridge.

I have no reason to do so. Get your facts right.
Back to top
Bobin
FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 252


PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Colonel wrote:
Bobin wrote:
Fred75 wrote:

God designed the vagina for the penis.


the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.


Your argument fails.

There is no creator until proven such.


Crííost an Sláánaitheoir Fééin
Back to top
The Colonel
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 6926
Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire

PostPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobin wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Bobin wrote:
Fred75 wrote:

God designed the vagina for the penis.


the Creator tells the creation what to do.
the creation does not tell the Creator what to do.


Your argument fails.

There is no creator until proven such.


Crííost an Sláánaitheoir Fééin


Sod off nutcase.
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 6322


PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobin wrote:
Cambridge wrote:
Quote:
biologically, it doesn't. the anus is for elimination of waste.
the vagina has two purposes. sex and delivering a baby.
the mouth is for kissing. there's not much of a limit to what can be kissed or how it can be kissed.


Once again, hairy back, you make a lot of silly assumptions. Have you communed with mother nature? How do you know what organs are for what purpose?

You are committing what is known as the essentialist fallacy, that anything in reproduction happens for the sake of the species rather than for the sake of the would-be propagator’s genes. How do you know these functions are for the species? Who told you this?

You are also committing the teleological fallacy, that anything in evolution is pulled toward a goal rather than pushed by the past. You pose “elimination” and “sex and delivering babies” and “kissing” as the final purpose of these physiological features. Who told you this and how is s/he related to whatever deity you invoke for this.

Finally, you are committing the normative fallacy…that concepts such as ‘good, better, and best’ have a role to play in evolution anymore than they have in physics or chemistry. You seem to imply that it is better to use the tongue for tasting tea, or the anus for elimination, and the vagina for the strict purposes that your deity designates: “sex and delivering a baby.”

As always, ignorance, my ignorant fool. I am pissed that I have to explain this s*** to you. If you violate any of these fallacies again, I am going to send you a f***ing bill, idiot.


thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. you are probably correct in your philosophical assessment --- i clearly see now after reading your post, that the mouth also eliminates the waste of the brain and, in the process, spews out S*** in all directions,



laughing laughing laughing laughing laughing
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 6322


PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cambridge wrote:
Quote:
biologically, it doesn't. the anus is for elimination of waste.
the vagina has two purposes. sex and delivering a baby.
the mouth is for kissing. there's not much of a limit to what can be kissed or how it can be kissed.


Once again, hairy back, you make a lot of silly assumptions. Have you communed with mother nature? How do you know what organs are for what purpose?

You are committing what is known as the essentialist fallacy, that anything in reproduction happens for the sake of the species rather than for the sake of the would-be propagator’s genes. How do you know these functions are for the species? Who told you this?

You are also committing the teleological fallacy, that anything in evolution is pulled toward a goal rather than pushed by the past. You pose “elimination” and “sex and delivering babies” and “kissing” as the final purpose of these physiological features. Who told you this and how is s/he related to whatever deity you invoke for this.

Finally, you are committing the normative fallacy…that concepts such as ‘good, better, and best’ have a role to play in evolution anymore than they have in physics or chemistry. You seem to imply that it is better to use the tongue for tasting tea, or the anus for elimination, and the vagina for the strict purposes that your deity designates: “sex and delivering a baby.”

As always, ignorance, my ignorant fool. I am pissed that I have to explain this s*** to you. If you violate any of these fallacies again, I am going to send you a f***ing bill, idiot.


The truth of it comes from the fact that you are for more likely to get sick and die from eating out ones S*** hole than any other hole.
Not to mention it TASTES LIKE S***.
And the same goes for sex.

It's why girls are told to wipe their ass's front to back instead of back to front.
You get S*** in the t*** and your going to have problems.

But F*** that logic eh... the ass is for screwing!
IDIOTS! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Politics And Social Issues All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 7 of 9

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts


---