|
|
| Author |
Message |
mike p
FemaleFirst Regular (50+ Posts)
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 55
|
 Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 9:38 am Post subject: |
 |
|
i wonder if this survey, the one that found 1 in 3 were not the father, when testing 300,000 ......
i wonder if it takes in to account step dads ?
if it simply tested without asking family circumstances then its not so shocking. maybe lots of these guys were simply step dads, and were not tricked dads at all ?
can we have a link to this please ?
1 in 3 seems awfully high and frankly leaves me thinking that women have way less morals than i have been led to believe.
how insane is 1 in 3, i cant get over it. not every affair ends in a child, some surely must be using protection, and sex does not always result in pregnancy. so if 1 in 3 children are from extra maritals, then surely 1 in 2 women must be F****** other people.
the actual number must be higher than the prooved through dna tests number.
yeah, dna test. definately. and i think we may need to electronically tag, and lie detector test women as well, DAILY.
can we have a link to this study plzzzzz ????? i need to see it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Verve
FemaleFirst Guru
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 5487
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh the fear .... the fear of loosing the man you love.... it's sad.
I had a relative who faked a pregnancy don't know how the f*ck she did it. She didn't get away with it but I wanted to know how come he never went with her to a sonogram appointment. How come he never asked for a picture? It was just shameless.......  sorry.... I still remember walking into her living room and seeing all this baby stuff and I asked what's all this... She told me the situation and he had thrown her a baby shower.  I felt so sad for her, honestly. More than for the guy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Topic Of Gossip
FemaleFirst Guru
Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 5272
Location: London
|
| Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr A wrote: |
A saw a study a few days ago and it said as many as 1 in 10 (1 in 8 in some places) women were lying and tricking thier current man into beleiving they were the father when infact he was not the father.
DNA test, yep definately a good idea
although if you ask for one and are still in a relationship I doubt it's gonna go down too well ..lol |
Well... in a recent study the figure was 1 in 25 in the UK...
BBC News - "One in 25 fathers 'not the daddy" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mike p
FemaleFirst Regular (50+ Posts)
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 55
|
| Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well what was this one that cambridge mentioned that said 30% ......
cambidge where have u gotten this from ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr A
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 2367
|
| Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mike p wrote: |
well what was this one that cambridge mentioned that said 30% ......
cambidge where have u gotten this from ? |
probably they did the study on alot of council estates where the women were single mothers before hooking up with new men and did not take the fact that the men knew they were not the father into consideration.
1 in 3 seems to big a number for men tricked into thinking the child is there's |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
moto_rider
Hello. I am New! Talk to Me
Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wow i feel bad for the guy in the news article in the first post. so now by law he HAS to pay for someone else's kid still? what kinda world do we live in? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1583
|
| Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
well what was this one that cambridge mentioned that said 30% ......
cambidge where have u gotten this from ? |
Good question. It was in Discover magazine, but I've lost the exact citation. Sometime within the past year and a half, so maybe you can google it. But, really, 25% or 30%, what is really significant is the similarity of the numbers.
| Quote: |
| wow i feel bad for the guy in the news article in the first post. so now by law he HAS to pay for someone else's kid still? what kinda world do we live in? |
Moto, yer I was the first poster and I really think that guy got f***ed over royally. I'm a lawyer and that appellate court sits in San Francisco, and I would like to grab those appellate judges by the throat and scream, “what were you thinking?” But what’s the use? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Site Map
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register
My Profile Space
