Fred75 wrote:DanMc wrote:One cannot help illness.
If one has an ill child, why should that child not be treated?
Yes. But not by me.
I'm not responsible for a child just because two individuals irresponsibly brought into the world one they cannot themselves take care of.
If, as ADULTS, you cannot afford to care for a child... you shouldn't be having sex to begin with!
Am I right or wrong there?
Why not by you? As a proclaimed Christian would it not be your duty not to let the child die because you would rather keep the money and spend it on yourself? Sounds a bit like "am I my brother's keeper".
Are you right or wrong there? You are very wrong indeed.
Your thinking charity/altruism can be forced via taxation.
It cannot be.
Simply because you end up in jail for not being "charitable"!
You end up in jail for not obeying the law. We've been through this so many times it's tedious, but I didn't agree with Blairs decision to spend our money and risk the lives of our troops on Bushes oil war and I was always 100% sure the WMD argument was a lie (maybe you didn't see the pictures of Blair pouring with stress sweat and squirming when he was questioned about it) but I still had to pay my taxes and contribute to it.

















