..................

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues

Moderator: Silent One

Postby Guest » Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:27 am

yes
it is more healthy (recent study shows a 50% reduction in STD transmission)
it looks better/sexier and girls will like it more
wont have the trouble it causes in old age
im from America
Guest
 

Postby sexy sana » Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:39 am

as a muslim i should have my sons circumsised, but i dont think i will, as personsly i have been with circumsised guys n non-curcumsised and i have prefered guys with forskins as sex has been much better and alot more interesting. And im sure my sons will thank me when they are older and if they want to get circumsised then they can always do that too.
sexy sana
Newbie
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:37 pm

Postby Guest » Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:37 am

I, personally, am not of the belief that parents are perfectly entitled to do as they please to the genitals of their children in order to appease their imaginary friend.


"You are entitled to kill the kid before he's born, but you can't cut off his foreskin. No way."

Curious logic.
Guest
 

Postby elliegirl » Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:56 pm

im british. ive posted on the other thread in the sex issues board. my partner was circumcised due to a tight foreskin which was uncomfortable for him during sex. i dont see this a reason to have any future son of ours circumcised though. ill explain why his daddys penis looks different from his, and will let him make his own decision if he wants to be circumcised or not when hes old enough to understand.
elliegirl
 

Postby Guest27 » Mon Dec 18, 2006 8:32 am

I'm not going to comment because I know what any deviance from your personal opinion leads to and I'd rather not get into that again.

All I want to say is why not be civil? You catch more flies with honey, not vinegar, so what are you achieving? Belligerent diatribes, semantic battles, and hostility is all your threads ever are; ostensibly, they seem only to be your method for condemning a practice. For which you shouldn't post such a misleading subject line. Rather than ask a question where people can assume they can answer honestly, put a statement that lets other people know your position. Moreover, you should state your conviction on the matter since obviously it's going to eventually make itself known once they post something you don't condone.

I can understand where you're coming from and admire your passion for fighting what you believe in, but your approach is just wrong. Not only that, it's counterproductive. You're trying to change minds, right? Well what's going to work best: amiable discussion or terrorism?
User avatar
Guest27
Chat Master
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:26 pm

whats my name? call me honest.

Postby Guest » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:23 am

Ezra_Pound wrote:Did you feel a difference in sex? Some women I know say the way the foreskin rolls, and has a kind of "lubricating" effect, is really good for them. Did you notice that?


haha :lol:

you sound desperate to sound right.

and no, i dont post a username or care about spelling or give a chunky nugget what you think.

girls will always like seeing a face on their cocks, its simple stats. i don't go by the rubbish i find here, i find my stats the only place you can trust and thats from ppl. every girl i ever talked to about it says skin there is like suckin down a worm or shoving a small elephants in her snatch. most are cool about it but still bothered by it. circed is better. medically i don't give a crap unless yur my doc.

the way you bash other practices is xenophobic and closeminded. I hope you choke on the fumes from having your head shoved so far up your anus you die facing up aphyxiated on your own vomit :D

oh, and "bump" :rotflmao:
Guest
 

Postby Guest » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:26 am

oops, meant elephants trunk.

good thing i caught that before you went on a rant about how im too dumb to have an opinion. XD
Guest
 

Postby John3543543 » Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:18 am

No, because it decreases sensitivity meaning it takes more to orgasm. I would want my son to have a healthy sex life therefore would want him to keep his foreskin as he would enjoy sex more.

Also, in some schools, if its found out that you've been circumcised then you get bullied, called a Jew etc
John3543543
 

Postby JennyT » Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:03 pm

I'd never have my sons circumcised. If they want to get it done later in life (when they're old enough to understand and want to have it done, rather than be pressured into it), so be it, but I see no reason to mutilate them without their consent. Religion & tradition are no reasons to lop off sensitive parts of a childs anatomy! In fact, I don't think there have been any respectable studies done that claim benefits to circumcison. The new study is somewhat debatable by the sounds of it.

I always feel sorry for cirumcised guys. Their penises always look so... sad. :(
Don't know much about history, Don't know much biology, Don't know much about a science book, Don't know much about the french I took.

Good thing I'm willing to sleep my way to the top.
:twisted:
User avatar
JennyT
High Priestess
 
Posts: 921
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:32 pm

Postby elliegirl » Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:23 pm

Ezra_Pound wrote:Did you feel a difference in sex? Some women I know say the way the foreskin rolls, and has a kind of "lubricating" effect, is really good for them. Did you notice that?

Not really. Not really much difference for me at all as far as penetration is concerned. If anything, now that he is circumcised there seems to be slightly more friction, but not hugely noticeable.
elliegirl
 

Call me honest

Postby Guest » Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:34 pm

JennyT wrote:I'd never have my sons circumcised. If they want to get it done later in life (when they're old enough to understand and want to have it done, rather than be pressured into it), so be it, but I see no reason to mutilate them without their consent. Religion & tradition are no reasons to lop off sensitive parts of a childs anatomy! In fact, I don't think there have been any respectable studies done that claim benefits to circumcison. The new study is somewhat debatable by the sounds of it.

I always feel sorry for cirumcised guys. Their penises always look so... sad. :(


when its crying semen all over your face, trust me, its far from "sad" :lol:

if you grew up around it, cool, the chicks and medical experts wont wanna deviate from their group and will say hoods are good and girls wont know the better or feel too uncomfortable around guys with em bc of the familiarity. same could be said for the opposite end. the only reason these foreskin fighters are so fired up is bc it was there and then removed, so its better to keep it on until they'll remember agonizingly painful procedures to get it removed. haha, funny.. in a cruel way 8)

this is all rather funny to me. my brother had his foreskin removed when he was 15, before i was born (yeah, big family with far ends on the age spectrum), and we chatted about it and he tells me he only regrets the IMMENSE pain but nothing else. i have one brother who still has it, but me and my other bros are goin into the game masks off :D none of us have regrets and are actually bigger players than our older brothers were, not that that has anything to do with lack of a foreskin but hearing all this rubbish about being bummed in the head bc of it just makes me go :roll: cuz you know if they still had the skin theyd just find another reason to say wo is me :lol:
Guest
 

Postby Guest » Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:57 pm

Ezra_Pound wrote:

it is more healthy (recent study shows a 50% reduction in STD transmission)
Nonsense. Show it to me.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6176209.stm
Guest
 

Postby Ezra » Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:55 pm

http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/

There were studies conducted beforehand that showed that circumcision actually increased risk of HIV transmission. Not surprisingly, that wasn't published. Why would it be?

The "study" was full of holes - the biggest and most obvious being that the circumcised men were Muslim, and so, only had sex after marriage, and only with the one person.

The U.S., the most circumcised nation in the industrial world, also has the highest rate of HIV and other STDs.
Ezra
 

Postby sexy sana » Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:21 am

the reason why i prefer guys with foreskins is when i was younger i only went out with Muslim lads that were all circumcised, and when i saw the first uncut guy i was something completely new i think fascination and found allot of different things to do with it, and have always perfered then since, thus letting my sons keep hold of theirs
sexy sana
Newbie
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:37 pm

Postby Guest27 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:30 am

Ezra_Pound wrote:Guest27.
Old man, words cannot express just how violently I detest you. Everything I have ever seen you post makes me want to vomit. The fact that you would use the word "ostensibly" speaks volumes about you. Hahaha.

...



I'm 20 years old; "ostensibly" is a word I'm comfortable using written; and you must feel very small inside to need to come off that big on here.

Good luck Ezra_Pound.
User avatar
Guest27
Chat Master
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:26 pm

Next

Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests