This 'right' for gays is an injustice to children

Are the polititians doing a good job could you do better, debate your views with others
Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 3:33 pm

Scott L. Martinez the illigetimate b***** son wrote:
Astral wrote:It would be better for a child to have two gay loving parents, then two horrible heterosexual parents.


Hear Hear!


It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!

Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!

I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 8:46 pm

. wrote:
Scott L. Martinez the illigetimate b***** son wrote:
Astral wrote:It would be better for a child to have two gay loving parents, then two horrible heterosexual parents.


Hear Hear!


It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!

Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!

I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!


:clap:

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Sun May 13, 2007 9:26 pm

Oh my word, is it just me or is this thread a massive deja vu? Gays have as much right and should have as much right to adopt as hetero parents. Those who disagree, p.iss off. I would rather a child be adopted by a loving gay couple than a pair of heterosexuals from here who will teach the kid to be homophobic and anti-sematic!

User avatar
Scott L. Martinez
High Priestess
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:00 pm

Postby Scott L. Martinez on Sun May 13, 2007 9:43 pm

. wrote:
Scott L. Martinez the illigetimate b***** son wrote:
Astral wrote:It would be better for a child to have two gay loving parents, then two horrible heterosexual parents.


Hear Hear!


It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!

Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!

I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!


I'm going to expose you :lol:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 9:52 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

the young master of onanism utters the empty words of a boy crying wolf.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 10:17 pm

Daniellef wrote:Oh my word, is it just me or is this thread a massive deja vu? Gays have as much right and should have as much right to adopt as hetero parents. Those who disagree, p.iss off. I would rather a child be adopted by a loving gay couple than a pair of heterosexuals from here who will teach the kid to be homophobic and anti-sematic!


So then
We now teach children that a mother is not necessary to raise children?
because that's what you are endorsing!
The nullification of the need of a mother to a child!

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Sun May 13, 2007 10:19 pm

So, what if the mother available is a drug-addict? I dont believe a mother is necessary if there are 2 loving fathers or 2 loving mothers to bring it up!

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 10:19 pm

. wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

the young master of onanism utters the empty words of a boy crying wolf.


New word of the day!
I love it!
But I prefer Illigetimate b***** Son Onanist! :lol:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 10:21 pm

Daniellef wrote:So, what if the mother available is a drug-addict? I dont believe a mother is necessary if there are 2 loving fathers or 2 loving mothers to bring it up!


Why are you using a bad scenario to back up your statement that gay's are the equals of hetero couples?


i could say gay's are better than a pack of wolves!
Does that make my arguement right too?

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Sun May 13, 2007 10:23 pm

Ok, lets back up to your original question: are you saying that a mother is unnecessary in a childs upbringing?

No, I do not think a mother is necessary. I think a loving parent - ideally 2 loving parents are necessary.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 10:30 pm

The term "gay rights" should be an oxymoron.

User avatar
Scott L. Martinez
High Priestess
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:00 pm

Postby Scott L. Martinez on Sun May 13, 2007 10:31 pm

. wrote:
. wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

the young master of onanism utters the empty words of a boy crying wolf.


New word of the day!
I love it!
But I prefer Illigetimate b***** Son Onanist! :lol:


And you know what name I prefer for you.

Being a b***** has no stigma attached to it, especially when you are wealthy.

See you under your bridge Kallel in that wet cardboard box with the cling film conservatory. That's where trolls belong.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun May 13, 2007 10:37 pm

Scott L. Martinez wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

the young master of onanism utters the empty words of a boy crying wolf.

New word of the day!
I love it!
But I prefer Illigetimate b***** Son Onanist! :lol:

And you know what name I prefer for you.

Being a b***** has no stigma attached to it, especially when you are wealthy.

See you under your bridge Kallel in that wet cardboard box with the cling film conservatory. That's where trolls belong.

but being master of onanism does have a "stigma attached to it, especially when you are wealthy." :lol:

User avatar
Scott L. Martinez
High Priestess
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:00 pm

Postby Scott L. Martinez on Sun May 13, 2007 10:45 pm

Then you must be the fluent master of shite.

At least I have a dick to W*** with Kallel.

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Sun May 13, 2007 10:50 pm

Isnt it funny that my comments get ignored when the questioner cant think of an appropriate rhetoric?

PreviousNext

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest