Drinker wrote:elliott20 wrote:Drinker wrote:elliott20 wrote:okay, you want to attribute r**** to provocative clothes, let's run with that. A Federal Commission on Crime of Violence Study found that only 4.4% of all reported rapes involved provocative behavior on the part of the victim. Congrats, you've taken care of 4.4% of that.
okay, so what about women who WEREN'T dress povacatively and got raped? i.e. the other 95.6% of them? what do you have to say about that?
Ok, smart boy....
Do the math
Rapes each day in the USA = X
4.4% of X = Y
then I can say
Y = the number of women Elliot could care less about!
hey, by your argument you seem to not care about 96% of them, Kettle.
No... I am saying that the 96% are more than likely the POWER based rapes that you cannot protect yourself against.
What seperates you and I is that you do not care about the 4.4%!
Hehe, I give you an inch of silk and you try to construct an entire suit out of it. It's so funny to watch.
Maybe I do care about them, but I just enjoy watching you leap upon any tiny morsel of information I give you. Quite frankly, I just think you're being plain inefficient in your "crusade" to rid the world of r****.
But meh, whatever. Not like you're actually going to do anything about it other than stand there and scream at women for wearing tank tops.