mogadishu wrote:there was a major a few months ago who thought it ridiculous that black soldiers establish a trade union, because racism was "the way it is" in the british army. it was quite stunning.
wow... that's screwed up
mogadishu wrote:there was a major a few months ago who thought it ridiculous that black soldiers establish a trade union, because racism was "the way it is" in the british army. it was quite stunning.
mogadishu wrote:Do more than post idiotic one liners and I might raise the bar a little.
. wrote:I think the story is partly or totally bullshit. But if any of it is true, the reason they made fun of him is they don't respect him, probably because he is a malingerer or gay. The disrespect came first, then the racial taunts. If he were tall or short or thin or fat and earned the disrespect, they would taunt him for being tall or short or thin or fat. I can't believe the British Army is that openly racist. The U.S. Army is probably the most meritocratic, egalitarian government institution, unless you are gay. But the rules are known up front about gays in the military. Compare how the U.S. Army treated a Jamaican soldier: they promoted him to General, then to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (the highest uniformed post in the country) and then he was appointed Secretary of State of the United States. I'm talking about Colin Powell.
We investigate all substantive allegations of racism and would encourage anyone who has experience inappropriate behaviour to come forward.
mogadishu wrote:It's almost completely irrelevant to the actual news article printed. You post one opinion which is unsubstantiated and doesn't seem especially well thought out. Then you post about ten lines of entirely irrelevant material, which you seem to think is clever stuff just cos it's yours. Saying absolutely nothing about it was the most polite thing to do.
. wrote:It means a) the conclusions you draw do not follow logically from your premises
b) the premises themselves have no logical connection to the article posted
c) you do not establish yourself as any kind of authority to be making such claims.
Why don't you sign in with your username? I come back here thinking an interesting guest might have commented, but it's just you each time.
mogadishu wrote:http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/sunday/tm_method=full%26objectid=19134747%26siteid=98487-name_page.html
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests