See through dresses with nothing on underneath.

Talk about the latest trends, Your fashion disasters, other peoples fashion disasters
User avatar
VanessaEvans
Advocate
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:54 am
Location: East Midlands, UK

See through dresses with nothing on underneath.

Postby VanessaEvans on Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:26 am

What do you think?

I love it when I wear one. I really get turned on by the looks that I get.

Vanessa

User avatar
DipsyTipsy
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1871
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: UK

Postby DipsyTipsy on Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:52 am

I think its just cheap attention seeking and don't see why you'd bother wasting money on the dress. Why not just streak?
Previously TipsyDipsy.

User avatar
OffDutyNurse
High Priestess
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Essex

Postby OffDutyNurse on Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:59 am

I am totally for the more classy look of leaving something to the imagination!!!

But, each to their own...if you have the body for wearing a see through dress, why not?

User avatar
x_megan_x
High Priestess
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:46 pm

Postby x_megan_x on Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:41 am

At least what you see is what you get :shock:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

tiffanyboots
Wall Flower
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:47 am

Re: See through dresses with nothing on underneath.

Postby tiffanyboots on Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:39 pm

VanessaEvans wrote:What do you think?

I love it when I wear one. I really get turned on by the looks that I get.

Vanessa


You're right Vanessa, they are soooo sexy. I have 2 see thru dresses, but you have to have a good body to wear them which I'm sure you have. I don't know what it's like for you but when I wear mine, men are just putty in my hands!!

Tiffany
x

Sherwoodlondon
Magician
 
Posts: 789
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:11 pm

Postby Sherwoodlondon on Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:16 pm

Tiffany,

This sounds very interesting. :D

Do you wear your see-through dresses often? :whistle:

tiffanyboots
Wall Flower
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:47 am

Postby tiffanyboots on Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:09 am

Not all the time, but it helps when the sun is out as they are both mini-dresses. One is a black halter neck dress with I think mesh-type material with matching undies which my bf bought me. The other is a pink lacy baby doll dress which leaves nothing to the imagination!!

I don't think its tarty or cheap to wear them, if you feel sexy in them then why not.

Tiffany
x

Sherwoodlondon
Magician
 
Posts: 789
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:11 pm

Postby Sherwoodlondon on Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:27 am

Tiffany,

Why not indeed? :D

User avatar
DipsyTipsy
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1871
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: UK

Postby DipsyTipsy on Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:13 am

tiffanyboots wrote:

I don't think its tarty or cheap to wear them, if you feel sexy in them then why not.

x


It would be cheaper to just go without the dress if its not actually covering anything though. :lol: Get the same reaction too.

I don't know I just think the art dressing sexy has been lost. Now women can't seem to tell the difference between flesh flashing and sexy seduction. I see so many girls up town now that think the more flesh they display the more sexy they are when in actual fact its the elegant woman that knows how to dress and flashes a fancy bra and cleavage or a bit of leg subtlety that gets far more admiring glances from both sexes and gets approached more even though the near naked women gets more leering attention and tends to think getting groped and whistled at is the same as getting approached.

I tend to find its the more beautiful women with a little peek a boo style and quick wit that know just how much to display that don't need to resort to near enough nudity to get attention from men.

Just my opinion.
Previously TipsyDipsy.

User avatar
orak100
Chat Merchant
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:54 pm
Location: Surrey, England, UK

Postby orak100 on Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:47 pm

DipsyTipsy wrote:
tiffanyboots wrote:

I don't think its tarty or cheap to wear them, if you feel sexy in them then why not.

x


It would be cheaper to just go without the dress if its not actually covering anything though. :lol: Get the same reaction too.

I don't know I just think the art dressing sexy has been lost. Now women can't seem to tell the difference between flesh flashing and sexy seduction. I see so many girls up town now that think the more flesh they display the more sexy they are when in actual fact its the elegant woman that knows how to dress and flashes a fancy bra and cleavage or a bit of leg subtlety that gets far more admiring glances from both sexes and gets approached more even though the near naked women gets more leering attention and tends to think getting groped and whistled at is the same as getting approached.

I tend to find its the more beautiful women with a little peek a boo style and quick wit that know just how much to display that don't need to resort to near enough nudity to get attention from men.

Just my opinion.


I think both are sexy depending on the time and place. I think being naked is great too.

User avatar
DipsyTipsy
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1871
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: UK

Postby DipsyTipsy on Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:15 pm

orak100 wrote:
DipsyTipsy wrote:
tiffanyboots wrote:

I don't think its tarty or cheap to wear them, if you feel sexy in them then why not.

x


It would be cheaper to just go without the dress if its not actually covering anything though. :lol: Get the same reaction too.

I don't know I just think the art dressing sexy has been lost. Now women can't seem to tell the difference between flesh flashing and sexy seduction. I see so many girls up town now that think the more flesh they display the more sexy they are when in actual fact its the elegant woman that knows how to dress and flashes a fancy bra and cleavage or a bit of leg subtlety that gets far more admiring glances from both sexes and gets approached more even though the near naked women gets more leering attention and tends to think getting groped and whistled at is the same as getting approached.

I tend to find its the more beautiful women with a little peek a boo style and quick wit that know just how much to display that don't need to resort to near enough nudity to get attention from men.

Just my opinion.


I think both are sexy depending on the time and place. I think being naked is great too.


I agree but is in a pub the time and place :shock: (unless its a nudist club of course)
Previously TipsyDipsy.

sarahjane113
Chatter
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby sarahjane113 on Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:18 pm

Personally I would wear a slip if the skirt or dress was see through! Ive seen plenty of girls like this. I just wouldnt have the nerve and would be soo embarassed! Its bad enough if people see up my skirt by mistake!

AlexBMercier
Private Dancer (can now PM!)
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:02 pm

Postby AlexBMercier on Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:09 pm

I belief if your see thru is stopped by some sexy bra, then it is a different level of sophistication.

Ben Gordon
Newbie
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:42 pm

Postby Ben Gordon on Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:09 am

I have never seen a girl in a see thru dress with nothing under. I hope that changes.

User avatar
Tina TV
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Tina TV on Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:53 am

I know several beautiful ladies who go in for black see through with nothing under and must say it's very striking.

However it's not for the high street or local pub, you'll get far too much unwanted attention. Save if for the more intimate party / club.

Next

Return to Fashion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest