
Moderator: Silent One
noodles wrote:guest55 wrote:noodles wrote:. wrote:noodles wrote:amoral = without moral principles.
Theres nothing about my post that suggests I am amoral
Actually, there is.
You do not judge others with no morals as bad.
If you're saying that you think your own moral code is such that 'everyone' should follow or be judged then you are an extremely unrealistic and arrogant individual. And if my own stance on the subject brings you to believe i am amoral, fine, think as you like.
Only idiots and the amoral dont judge or want to be judged.
Of course I judge. I judge that men who hit thier wives should be given longer jail sentences. I judge that those who rape should not be allowed to walk the streets. I judge that adults who harm children should not be given the opportunity to do it again once caught. I judge that anyone who oppresses and abuses another for thier own gratification should be severley dealt with.
What I dont judge is how other adults conduct themselves with consent, and within the confines of thier own lives. That is NOT for me to judge thats for them to choose.
noodles wrote:My children will not need protecting from thier healthy and loving family unit but thanks for your concern.
. wrote:noodles wrote:My children will not need protecting from thier healthy and loving family unit but thanks for your concern.
"Family units", that what gays are calling it now, eh?
The SELFISH desires of the adults outranks the NEEDS of the child!
Your kids will have no idea how really selfish you are and how really selfish they will be to their children!
But you wont care.
Not until they grow up will you see what a mess you have made!
noodles wrote:. wrote:noodles wrote:My children will not need protecting from thier healthy and loving family unit but thanks for your concern.
"Family units", that what gays are calling it now, eh?
The SELFISH desires of the adults outranks the NEEDS of the child!
Your kids will have no idea how really selfish you are and how really selfish they will be to their children!
But you wont care.
Not until they grow up will you see what a mess you have made!
It must be awful for you to know that my gay parented kids are gonna be such better people than you could ever hope to be. I know it certainly makes me smile.
. wrote:noodles wrote:. wrote:noodles wrote:My children will not need protecting from thier healthy and loving family unit but thanks for your concern.
"Family units", that what gays are calling it now, eh?
The SELFISH desires of the adults outranks the NEEDS of the child!
Your kids will have no idea how really selfish you are and how really selfish they will be to their children!
But you wont care.
Not until they grow up will you see what a mess you have made!
It must be awful for you to know that my gay parented kids are gonna be such better people than you could ever hope to be. I know it certainly makes me smile.
That's your problem!
It's always about you, me or someone else!
NEVER ABOUT WHAT THE CHILD NEEDS!
Your child will grow up knowing a father is not needed.
And if you have a son that boy will have no problems leaving HIS children because he too knows they really need no father!
Se set a wonderful precedent for your children and grandchildren don't you?
For if you do have a son you have no standing to tell him to be a father to his children!
. wrote:. wrote:noodles wrote:. wrote:noodles wrote:My children will not need protecting from thier healthy and loving family unit but thanks for your concern.
"Family units", that what gays are calling it now, eh?
The SELFISH desires of the adults outranks the NEEDS of the child!
Your kids will have no idea how really selfish you are and how really selfish they will be to their children!
But you wont care.
Not until they grow up will you see what a mess you have made!
It must be awful for you to know that my gay parented kids are gonna be such better people than you could ever hope to be. I know it certainly makes me smile.
That's your problem!
It's always about you, me or someone else!
NEVER ABOUT WHAT THE CHILD NEEDS!
Your child will grow up knowing a father is not needed.
And if you have a son that boy will have no problems leaving HIS children because he too knows they really need no father!
Se set a wonderful precedent for your children and grandchildren don't you?
For if you do have a son you have no standing to tell him to be a father to his children!
So let's see now...
What two things does Noodles teach her children so far....
1) Fathers are not needed.
2) Sacrifices made for children are passe'!
Can anyone add more to that?
Noodles wrote:Kalel wrote:
So let's see now...
What two things does Noodles teach her children so far....
1) Fathers are not needed.
2) Sacrifices made for children are passe'!
Can anyone add more to that?
lol - you do make me laugh![]()
![]()
So its ok for a daughter not to have a father then? You're so transparent.
No. I just went with one of many arguements.
Remember...descrimintaion based on sex is illegal. So the arguement made based on one sex crosses over to the other.
I dont know how many times I have to tell you that my childs father 'will' be in thier life as will his large and supportive family (not that its any of your business quite frankly).
So then you teach children fathers need not be home?
They can just pop in part time whenever they feel?
I take it your parents divorced and thats how you grew up?
And what about his family... what happens when you get an opportunity to move somewhere better (a job for example)? I fail to see you staying with others when you never made any commitments to begin with (such as wedding vows to the father).
Ya ya... you can say that wont happen.
But the problem is you set a precedent for the selfish to do exactly that!
[
And what about the fathers relationship with the child???
What happens if he decides to start another family with a wife???
How will your child feel when he/she becomes a second class citizen because daddy lives and raises his OTHER children within his own home?
My friends child has however survived very well indeed without a father (his choice by the way) as do many many other children.
Children can SURVIVE the death/divorce of a parent too.
But that in no way makes it right for the child does it?
It would be great if you'd change the record really. You're extremely dull, boring, repetative and wrong.
The truth is always repetitive.
Your the classic liberal thinker!
You cannot see the consequences past your nose as to what precedents you set and their consequences!
. wrote:Noodles wrote:Kalel wrote:
So let's see now...
What two things does Noodles teach her children so far....
1) Fathers are not needed.
2) Sacrifices made for children are passe'!
Can anyone add more to that?
lol - you do make me laugh![]()
![]()
So its ok for a daughter not to have a father then? You're so transparent.
No. I just went with one of many arguements.
Remember...descrimintaion based on sex is illegal. So the arguement made based on one sex crosses over to the other.
I dont know how many times I have to tell you that my childs father 'will' be in thier life as will his large and supportive family (not that its any of your business quite frankly).
So then you teach children fathers need not be home?
They can just pop in part time whenever they feel?
I take it your parents divorced and thats how you grew up?
And what about his family... what happens when you get an opportunity to move somewhere better (a job for example)? I fail to see you staying with others when you never made any commitments to begin with (such as wedding vows to the father).
Ya ya... you can say that wont happen.
But the problem is you set a precedent for the selfish to do exactly that!
[
And what about the fathers relationship with the child???
What happens if he decides to start another family with a wife???
How will your child feel when he/she becomes a second class citizen because daddy lives and raises his OTHER children within his own home?
My friends child has however survived very well indeed without a father (his choice by the way) as do many many other children.
Children can SURVIVE the death/divorce of a parent too.
But that in no way makes it right for the child does it?
It would be great if you'd change the record really. You're extremely dull, boring, repetative and wrong.
The truth is always repetitive.
Your the classic liberal thinker!
You cannot see the consequences past your nose as to what precedents you set and their consequences!
noodles wrote:. wrote:Noodles wrote:Kalel wrote:
So let's see now...
What two things does Noodles teach her children so far....
1) Fathers are not needed.
2) Sacrifices made for children are passe'!
Can anyone add more to that?
lol - you do make me laugh![]()
![]()
So its ok for a daughter not to have a father then? You're so transparent.
No. I just went with one of many arguements.
Remember...descrimintaion based on sex is illegal. So the arguement made based on one sex crosses over to the other.
I dont know how many times I have to tell you that my childs father 'will' be in thier life as will his large and supportive family (not that its any of your business quite frankly).
So then you teach children fathers need not be home?
They can just pop in part time whenever they feel?
I take it your parents divorced and thats how you grew up?
And what about his family... what happens when you get an opportunity to move somewhere better (a job for example)? I fail to see you staying with others when you never made any commitments to begin with (such as wedding vows to the father).
Ya ya... you can say that wont happen.
But the problem is you set a precedent for the selfish to do exactly that!
[
And what about the fathers relationship with the child???
What happens if he decides to start another family with a wife???
How will your child feel when he/she becomes a second class citizen because daddy lives and raises his OTHER children within his own home?
My friends child has however survived very well indeed without a father (his choice by the way) as do many many other children.
Children can SURVIVE the death/divorce of a parent too.
But that in no way makes it right for the child does it?
It would be great if you'd change the record really. You're extremely dull, boring, repetative and wrong.
The truth is always repetitive.
Your the classic liberal thinker!
You cannot see the consequences past your nose as to what precedents you set and their consequences!
My parents are still married thanks.
My long term plans are none of your business, however all the points you mention and many more have been discussed in depth with all concerned.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests