revlarsyn wrote:Bush's detractors omit to mention that Bush has a higher IQ than John Kerry or Al Gore and that Bush had better grades at Yale than Kerry (who also went to Yale) or Gore (who went to Harvard). Bush then received an MBA from Harvard Business School whereas Al Gore flunked out of divinity school and Kerry received a law degree from the lesser Boston College Law School.
I wonder what Hitlers' or Saddam Husseins' IQ was/is, like it matters.
Unfortunately, ignorance divorced from reality and visceral hatred are common traits of Bush's detractors on the left.
The Bush haters fervently hope that America is defeated in Iraq - even with the attendant loss of American lives - so they can call Bush a failure. The liberal blogs rejoice at every American setback in Iraq, at every ambush and every car bomb, because defeat in Iraq would render Bush a failure. They are so consumed with hatred for Bush that they openly root for the enemy.
This seems like the rant of a hack, you seem to choose your "facts" very selectively. Bush haters, liberal blogs etc. etc. "desperate to see their own die", please don't confuse your own bias in representing liberals for fact.
Being a liberal is not a euphemism for "Bush hater" or "anti american", it means having another political view, or are Kerry and Kennedy holding GI funeral parties now ?
Their predecessors on the left employed this strategy successfully to ensure defeat in Vietnam. Indeed, the North Vietnamese tailored their military tactics for the specific purpose of agitating American liberals to protest against the war, to eat away at America's will from within. The left obliged, in many cases rooting openly for a Viet Cong victory. You and your fellow travelers are a newer model of the same instrument.
Now you sound like a National Socialist, "We would have won, but were stabbed in the back", when the real issue is willfully ignored.
I find such people despicably ungrateful for the freedoms they enjoy, which were obtained at great cost in blood of American boys who these self-styled "progressive liberals" smugly deride as ignorant rednecks.
Now you're using the Chirac gambit, how to deflect defeat. You lost the argument over Vietnam so lets find someone else to blame
The liberal left in America openly wishes for any American setback, domestic or foreign, whether it be an economic downturn or even another 9/11, so they can have a vehicle to finally regain the power they lost owing to their lack of any affirmative agenda.
Oh yeah! Every liberal, oh sorry I mean "Bush hater", wants the USA to be in the depths of reccession and subjected to military invasion.
Can't you see how implausible your representations here read ?
Our one area of agreement is your expressed shame that you are an American. I am surely ashamed that you are an American, or at least that you call yourself one.
Your just bitching now.
This type of exchange confuses debate with the tribalism of the terraces.
I expected more from you murray, I'm not sure why, but never mind.
First, I don't know who you are and I don't give a f*** what you "expected" from me. Frankly, you don't know me so I can't understand why you would have any expectations whatsoever.
I mentioned Bush's IQ because the poster I was responding to called Bush "a complete moron" who "can barely form a coherent thought." Did you bother to read what I was responding to? I did quote it in my post, Einstein.
I find it curious that you proffer no facts to rebut what "seems" to you "like the rant of a hack." What are your qualifications to adjudge who is a hack and who is not? I stated my qualifications; now let's hear yours.
With respect to Vietnam, you are clearly ignorant. I rely on the statements of former Viet Cong themselves who admitted that military tactics were often planned with an eye toward inflaming anti-war agitators in the U.S., which included leftist and socialist groups based in universities such as UC Berkeley in the west and Columbia University in the east. These university students - who were so passionate about the needless loss of American lives - did not have to fight in Vietnam owing to college deferments from the draft.
My references to "liberals," "Bush haters" and "the left," include the following without limitation:
Democratic National Committee and its head Howard Dean
U.S. Senators - Ted Kennedy, Richard Durbin, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Chuck Schumer, John Kerry, Pat Leahy, Jay Rockefeller, Al Gore (former Senator)
U.S. Congress - Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel, Barbara Lee, John Conyers
Newspapers - New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Guardian (UK), Independent (UK)
Mass Circulation Periodicals - Time, Newsweek, Der Spiegel
Television and Radio - CBS, ABC, BBC, NBC, PBS (Public Broadcasting System), NPR (National Public Radio), Reuters, Agence France Presse, Air America Radio
Political Journals - Nation, Progressive, American Prospect, Mother Jones, Village Voice (political articles therein)
Columnists - Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, Anthony Lewis, Frank Rich, Bob Herbert, E.J. Dionne, Nicholas Kristof, Harold Meyerson, Victor Navasky, Katrina vanden Heuvel, Thomas Oliphant, Robert Scheer, Molly Ivins, Katha Pollitt, Robert Kuttner, Matthew Rothschild, Sidney Blumenthal, Robert Fisk, Eric Alterman, George Monbiot, Simon Hoggart, Naomi Klein, Julian Borger, David Corn, Simon Tisdall, Polly Toynbee, Martin Woollacott, Hugo Young, Gary Younge, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Matthew Yglesias, murray Waas
Blogs - Daily Kos, Buzzflash, Democratic Underground, AmericaBlog, MoveOn.org, Liberal Oasis, Huffington Post, Smirking Chimp, Max Blumenthal, Joshua Micah Marshall, Matthew Gross, Daily Howler, Crooks and Liars, Eschaton, Talking Points Memo
Groups and Individuals - People for the American Way, American Civil Liberties Union, NARAL, Michael Moore, Al Franken, Ted Rall, Center for American Progress, George Soros
You say that "[t]his type of exchange confuses debate with the tribalism of the terraces." I have had no exchange with you, so what the f*** are you talking about?
Finally, I note your pre-emptive deployment of the ultimate weapon of the intellectually and factually underequipped: "If all else fails, call him a Nazi." I say "pre-emptive" because most of your ilk resort to the Nazi smear only after I have vivisected them intellectually and exposed their arguments as excrement. Nonetheless, I will not dignify your low brow smear with a verbal defense. For that, I will piss on you.