ok this is an example of what is seen as normal, there are two babys one have two arm and the another have one missing, the baby with one arm should have every right as the baby with two arms does, But as it comes down to it the baby with one arm is not normal an people will not treat it like a normal person! im trying to say how i feel about this subjected and becuase i dont agree with you's, you's take a dig at me and you are not accepting my point of veiw, i have nothing against men wearing womens clothing behind closed door but not in public
quatinus wrote:.... ( ITS JUST WRONG FOR MEN TO WEAR WOMENS CLOTHING)
There are no such thing as womens clothes or mens clothes there are however clothes that are, and have been, traditionally worn by women or men. That said it does not mean that it should always be so. Using your argument - is it wrong for women to wear trousers which have been traditionally worn by men?
I don't want to repeat what I have said in earlier posts in this thread but men and women should have the right to wear what they like. Clothes do not necessarily affect or demonstrate an individuals sexuality.
You seem to have a very narrow minded viewpoint. It is viewpoints like that that suppress the male freedom to wear what they like whilst women can do just that. Have you worn socks, trousers, shirts - traditionally mens wear!!!!!!
quatinus wrote:.... ( ITS JUST WRONG FOR MEN TO WEAR WOMENS CLOTHING)
There are no such thing as womens clothes or mens clothes there are however clothes that are, and have been, traditionally worn by women or men. That said it does not mean that it should always be so. Using your argument - is it wrong for women to wear trousers which have been traditionally worn by men?
I don't want to repeat what I have said in earlier posts in this thread but men and women should have the right to wear what they like. Clothes do not necessarily affect or demonstrate an individuals sexuality.
You seem to have a very narrow minded viewpoint. It is viewpoints like that that suppress the male freedom to wear what they like whilst women can do just that. Have you worn socks, trousers, shirts - traditionally mens wear!!!!!!
quatinus wrote:.... ( ITS JUST WRONG FOR MEN TO WEAR WOMENS CLOTHING)
There are no such thing as womens clothes or mens clothes there are however clothes that are, and have been, traditionally worn by women or men. That said it does not mean that it should always be so. Using your argument - is it wrong for women to wear trousers which have been traditionally worn by men?
I don't want to repeat what I have said in earlier posts in this thread but men and women should have the right to wear what they like. Clothes do not necessarily affect or demonstrate an individuals sexuality.
You seem to have a very narrow minded viewpoint. It is viewpoints like that that suppress the male freedom to wear what they like whilst women can do just that. Have you worn socks, trousers, shirts - traditionally mens wear!!!!!!
quatinus wrote:.... ( ITS JUST WRONG FOR MEN TO WEAR WOMENS CLOTHING)
There are no such thing as womens clothes or mens clothes there are however clothes that are, and have been, traditionally worn by women or men. That said it does not mean that it should always be so. Using your argument - is it wrong for women to wear trousers which have been traditionally worn by men?
I don't want to repeat what I have said in earlier posts in this thread but men and women should have the right to wear what they like. Clothes do not necessarily affect or demonstrate an individuals sexuality.
You seem to have a very narrow minded viewpoint. It is viewpoints like that that suppress the male freedom to wear what they like whilst women can do just that. Have you worn socks, trousers, shirts - traditionally mens wear!!!!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests