The Colonel wrote:
But it's not. It is a psychological disorder on the DSM.
Twaddle! What are you going-on about: "But it's not.", you say. Not what? You make no sense whatsoever (as always!). Please, can you, at least, have the decency to reply in full sentences, and state that which you mean, instead of assuming that we are all psychic.
You are quite correct in your assertion that "it" is a listed psychological disorder within DSM., (Presumably, by "it", you mean a nappy-fetish?).
So what? Why does such a listing mean that "it" is anyway harmful to anyone? Why should a DSM listing deprive people of their human rights, which includes the right to wear and use nappies, should they so wish? I would suggest that it does not do so, in any way, shape or form.
I would also suggest that your stated theories on "Munchausen by Proxy" are seriously flawed in this connection. There may be parents who force their children into nappies, for their own gain, and, IMHO, this is abhorrent, although others might disagree, of course. But you must also realise that there are some children who enjoy wearing and using nappies, for whatever reason. That is the very nature of variety within the human sphere of diversity.
I know that you are a growing person, as are we all, but you have much to learn. The more that you learn, the more you will realise how much you do not know, or understand. This is part of the "growing-up" process.












