What do women think of circumcised guys? Please post

[G Wizard]

yea Gwizard man, that pulling on nighttime erections is the WORST thats my biggest problem at the moment and most annoying, cant wait till this is over!!!how long did it take for it to go away?and how long till u were fully fixed and shagging away!?!

One other thing:

Let me know whether you find that things lower down (ie, scrotal sac) starts to feel a bit uncomfortably tight.

Oh, I did want to know, exactly which of the options did you choose? Plastibell? Freehand? One of the clamps?

[Mooncat]

If I didn't have low hangers, they would be half-way up my shaft when erect.

[Rebman]

Back to sleep myron.

The Colonel seems to be resorting to his old, tried and tested, ploy of claiming that those who criticise him must all be the same person. If he is so insistent on living in his own defensive fantasy land, then why stop at Myron, spectrum and me being the same person? I am sure that AussieAdam and G Wizard would feel offended if they were left out.

The Colonel’s list of members and guests, who he claims are the same person, seems to be endless. He has even claimed in the past that admin has confirmed his contention. However, when challenged about this, he admitted to lying (about the only thing that he seems to be qualified to do).

That was McMum actually.

I am most certainly not Myron or spectrum, or indeed any of the other dozens of supposed aliases on the Colonel’s list.

You don't know me, so you can't pass judgement.

If you do so, it suggests you DO know me, and therefore you are another member.

Someone doesn't just appear and start attacking someone as you did with me.

Get it?

Flawed logic as usual. I am not another member, and you were the one who initiated the attacking. On the 29th Feb you addressed me as “Mr. Idiot”. Up until that time I had been perfectly civil to you, although I had disagreed with some of the contents of your posts.

As for knowing you, I knew nothing about you until you verbally attacked me, and Myron repeatedly stated that you were an admitted liar. On a number of occasions you have invited members to check back through your posting record, so I took you up on that invitation, and to be brutally honest I was appalled by what I found. I do not believe that you remain unaware of the number of posters (members and guests) who hold you in contempt for your unforgivable activities on the FF forums.

Get it?

[The Colonel]

Back to sleep myron.

The Colonel seems to be resorting to his old, tried and tested, ploy of claiming that those who criticise him must all be the same person. If he is so insistent on living in his own defensive fantasy land, then why stop at Myron, spectrum and me being the same person? I am sure that AussieAdam and G Wizard would feel offended if they were left out.

The Colonel’s list of members and guests, who he claims are the same person, seems to be endless. He has even claimed in the past that admin has confirmed his contention. However, when challenged about this, he admitted to lying (about the only thing that he seems to be qualified to do).

That was McMum actually.

I am most certainly not Myron or spectrum, or indeed any of the other dozens of supposed aliases on the Colonel’s list.

You don't know me, so you can't pass judgement.

If you do so, it suggests you DO know me, and therefore you are another member.

Someone doesn't just appear and start attacking someone as you did with me.

Get it?

Flawed logic as usual. I am not another member, and you were the one who initiated the attacking. On the 29th Feb you addressed me as “Mr. Idiot”. Up until that time I had been perfectly civil to you, although I had disagreed with some of the contents of your posts.

As for knowing you, I knew nothing about you until you verbally attacked me, and Myron repeatedly stated that you were an admitted liar. On a number of occasions you have invited members to check back through your posting record, so I took you up on that invitation, and to be brutally honest I was appalled by what I found. I do not believe that you remain unaware of the number of posters (members and guests) who hold you in contempt for your unforgivable activities on the FF forums.

Get it?

If you are referring to my anti-religious stance, get over it.

I am entitled to those views whether you are a god freak or not.

[Andrew Macduff]

[the survey says that] only 13% prefer the natural dick!

First, it's a biased sample with mainly US respondents who have never even seen a natural dick

I say, colonel, you must have extraordinary vision! How do you know this for a fact?

[Fred75]

[the survey says that] only 13% prefer the natural dick!

First, it's a biased sample with mainly US respondents who have never even seen a natural dick

I say, colonel, you must have extraordinary vision! How do you know this for a fact?

The Colonel is right.
There are not many uncircumcised men in the US.

[The Colonel]

[the survey says that] only 13% prefer the natural dick!

First, it's a biased sample with mainly US respondents who have never even seen a natural dick

I say, colonel, you must have extraordinary vision! How do you know this for a fact?

The Colonel is right.
There are not many uncircumcised men in the US.

Finally Fred agrees with something.

[Polgara69]

Lol! U should copy and paste that on every post you make!

[Polgara69]

The Colonel is right.

[Sistergurl]

The Colonel is right.
There are not many uncircumcised men in the US.

you have seen many c0cks Fred75. that makes you a cockspert. i like them too. and i think gays guys rock. you rock Fred75.

[Rebman]

If you are referring to my anti-religious stance, get over it.

I am entitled to those views whether you are a god freak or not.

I am not a “god freak”. I am in fact an agnostic.

You are entitled to your anti-religious views, but that does not mean that you are entitled to express them in terms of offensive slurs against other members. By your own definition, this makes you a troll.

You have also lied about religion, e.g. claiming that most priests are paedophiles. You have no evidence for this, because there is no evidence, but you don’t bother about mere technicalities like evidence before spreading your vile bigoted hatred.

Religious threads are far from being the only ones where you have repeatedly been abusive without provocation. For instance, in a recent instance when Shinykatie initiated a thread concerning eco-weddings, your opening reply was: “What a nutter”. If she wants an eco-wedding, she has every right to have one and you have every right to disagree about eco-weddings, but merely being abusive exposes you as being a troll.

You are also a blatant liar, a bully and a bigot in a number of threads, whenever people choose not to do things your preferred way, or have beliefs that you disagree with.

By far the worst instances of your bullying, lying and bigotry have been in your inexplicable and endless interventions in nappy/diaper threads (do you have some sort of repressed nappy fetish?). You have cast offensive slurs against most of the mothers/women on these threads and concocted libellous allegations against the two women who were prepared to stand up to you and your bullying slurs. You then claimed that you had proof that they were one and the same person and that they/(she) have Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, and force their children to wear nappies. When asked by a member to produce your proof that they were the same person and forced their children into nappies, you replied:-
“I know that I am correct. Even if I could prove it, who would listen?”

It would appear therefore that you have libelled these two women without any viable shred of evidence. Saying that you know you are correct is meaningless without evidence. As you had conducted such a campaign of hate against these women, I decided to go through the laborious task of searching through these threads to see if you were correct about there being evidence for these allegations. There was none.

You, Colonel, are probably the most despicable low-life on these forums, and that really is saying something, what with some of the other weirdoes here.

[The Colonel]

If you are referring to my anti-religious stance, get over it.

I am entitled to those views whether you are a god freak or not.

I am not a “god freak”. I am in fact an agnostic.

You are entitled to your anti-religious views, but that does not mean that you are entitled to express them in terms of offensive slurs against other members. By your own definition, this makes you a troll.

You have also lied about religion, e.g. claiming that most priests are paedophiles. You have no evidence for this, because there is no evidence, but you don’t bother about mere technicalities like evidence before spreading your vile bigoted hatred.

Religious threads are far from being the only ones where you have repeatedly been abusive without provocation. For instance, in a recent instance when Shinykatie initiated a thread concerning eco-weddings, your opening reply was: “What a nutter”. If she wants an eco-wedding, she has every right to have one and you have every right to disagree about eco-weddings, but merely being abusive exposes you as being a troll.

You are also a blatant liar, a bully and a bigot in a number of threads, whenever people choose not to do things your preferred way, or have beliefs that you disagree with.

By far the worst instances of your bullying, lying and bigotry have been in your inexplicable and endless interventions in nappy/diaper threads (do you have some sort of repressed nappy fetish?). You have cast offensive slurs against most of the mothers/women on these threads and concocted libellous allegations against the two women who were prepared to stand up to you and your bullying slurs. You then claimed that you had proof that they were one and the same person and that they/(she) have Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, and force their children to wear nappies. When asked by a member to produce your proof that they were the same person and forced their children into nappies, you replied:-
“I know that I am correct. Even if I could prove it, who would listen?”

It would appear therefore that you have libelled these two women without any viable shred of evidence. Saying that you know you are correct is meaningless without evidence. As you had conducted such a campaign of hate against these women, I decided to go through the laborious task of searching through these threads to see if you were correct about there being evidence for these allegations. There was none.

You, Colonel, are probably the most despicable low-life on these forums, and that really is saying something, what with some of the other weirdoes here.

Sooz and I actually had a discussion via PM. She admitted in private that McMum was weird.

But there is one thing I'd like to say.

Hello McMum! Nice to see you back at your old habits.

For a while I thought you were myron. Sincere apologies myron.

[Mistress/Momma Nicci]

I don't have a preference, been with about equal number of both circumcised and uncircumcised (I think one more circumcised than un).

It's all about how ya use it.

[Sharon den Adel]

Rebman, Colonel has been here alot longer than you and your 16 posts, so quit whinging and bugger off.

[Andrew Macduff]

Rebman, Colonel has been here alot longer than you and your 16 posts

Just because he's been here a long time, like a rat in the kitchen, doesn't mean that we have to be respectful of his belligerent methods. A troll is a troll, no matter how long he's been lurking behind the wainscotting.