Abortion

[Big Ben]

Bobin, there are many women in India who carry someone else's baby for money. Usually it is because the biological mother is unable to do so herself. I think the price is usually in the $5-10 thousand range.

[Bobin]

Bobin, there are many women in India who carry someone else's baby for money.

In the US, there are many couples, for one reason or another, who cannot have children. It's kind of sad that so many babies are aborted when they would have had a loving home with one of these families.

[Bobin]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

[Fred75]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

Children are like objects.
The worthless ones end up down the sink and the wanted ones live for a dollar.

No wonder we have other children smacking toddlers in the head with bricks.

[The Colonel]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

Children are like objects.
The worthless ones end up down the sink and the wanted ones live for a dollar.

No wonder we have other children smacking toddlers in the head with bricks.

So if all babies are equal before birth and deserve life, why then after birth, do you not still adopt the same principle?

[Lena]

Your ahead of yourself colonel.................wrong to expect logic and sanity from el ferd.

[Fred75]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

Children are like objects.
The worthless ones end up down the sink and the wanted ones live for a dollar.

No wonder we have other children smacking toddlers in the head with bricks.

So if all babies are equal before birth and deserve life, why then after birth, do you not still adopt the same principle?

Because I do think killing men that r**** and kill children is justifiable.
The assassination attempt on Hitler... was that not justifiable?

[The Colonel]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

Children are like objects.
The worthless ones end up down the sink and the wanted ones live for a dollar.

No wonder we have other children smacking toddlers in the head with bricks.

So if all babies are equal before birth and deserve life, why then after birth, do you not still adopt the same principle?

Because I do think killing men that r**** and kill children is justifiable.
The assassination attempt on Hitler... was that not justifiable?

There are some who would ask: is it not justifiable for a woman to have an abortion? (I don't agree with abortion, but it makes as much sense as your position above).

Why treat babies with respect if you can't treat humans with respect?

And one question I do really want to know is this (and I want you to answer):

Judging your positions on abortion and homosexuality, which you equally despise, would you:

a) want the child to be born and be gay,
b) have the child aborted so that it couldn't be gay,
c) something else.

You've never answered this question before and it does have relevance here over your points.

[The Colonel]

Your ahead of yourself colonel.................wrong to expect logic and sanity from el ferd.

[Fred75]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

Children are like objects.
The worthless ones end up down the sink and the wanted ones live for a dollar.

No wonder we have other children smacking toddlers in the head with bricks.

So if all babies are equal before birth and deserve life, why then after birth, do you not still adopt the same principle?

Because I do think killing men that r**** and kill children is justifiable.
The assassination attempt on Hitler... was that not justifiable?

There are some who would ask: is it not justifiable for a woman to have an abortion? (I don't agree with abortion, but it makes as much sense as your position above).
We are on the same page in regards to abortion, Colonel.
It's morally wrong to take a child because it's inconvenient. PERIOD.

Why treat babies with respect if you can't treat humans with respect?
I think the lack of respect for life in the womb FEEDS societies lack of respect out of the womb too.
Ergo more children committing violent acts.

And one question I do really want to know is this (and I want you to answer):

Judging your positions on abortion and homosexuality, which you equally despise, would you:

a) want the child to be born and be gay, Why would I want anyone to be IMMORAL? Just like I abhor someone born to "love" children... I have no desire to become their ENABLER.
b) have the child aborted so that it couldn't be gay, That' me fuckin with liberals pro abortion and homosexuality. I find it fun to throw a situation THEY created right back into their face!
c) something else.

You've never answered this question before and it does have relevance here over your points.

[The Colonel]

I would not have an abortion for money, I would have an abortion because I wanted one.

yeah. but if you WERE preganat, you'd take the $1,000,000 to have the baby. And then put it up for adoption.

Children are like objects.
The worthless ones end up down the sink and the wanted ones live for a dollar.

No wonder we have other children smacking toddlers in the head with bricks.

So if all babies are equal before birth and deserve life, why then after birth, do you not still adopt the same principle?

Because I do think killing men that r**** and kill children is justifiable.
The assassination attempt on Hitler... was that not justifiable?

There are some who would ask: is it not justifiable for a woman to have an abortion? (I don't agree with abortion, but it makes as much sense as your position above).
We are on the same page in regards to abortion, Colonel.
It's morally wrong to take a child because it's inconvenient. PERIOD.

Why treat babies with respect if you can't treat humans with respect?
I think the lack of respect for life in the womb FEEDS societies lack of respect out of the womb too.
Ergo more children committing violent acts.

And one question I do really want to know is this (and I want you to answer):

Judging your positions on abortion and homosexuality, which you equally despise, would you:

a) want the child to be born and be gay, Why would I want anyone to be IMMORAL? Just like I abhor someone born to "love" children... I have no desire to become their ENABLER.
b) have the child aborted so that it couldn't be gay, That' me fuckin with liberals pro abortion and homosexuality. I find it fun to throw a situation THEY created right back into their face!
c) something else.

You've never answered this question before and it does have relevance here over your points.

You didn't really give a clear answer to my question.

And homosexuality is only immoral to you due to religion.

Perhaps you should read Alfred Kinsev (1948) (who was an American Professor who discovered 50% of men and 28% of women had had same sex relations).

[Fred75]

You didn't really give a clear answer to my question.

And homosexuality is only immoral to you due to religion.

Perhaps you should read Alfred Kinsev (1948) (who was an American Professor who discovered 50% of men and 28% of women had had same sex relations).

The ass isnt designed to have a C*** shoved up it.
That's what a vagina is for!

Adn your never going to convince me that some guy down on his knee's sucking another man off is my equal.
Equal to a woman... yes... me... NO.

You can believe all that feminista EMASCULATING propaganda crap... but I'm not.

[coolman]

Then why did she spread her legs?

Rule number 1: never tell a chick NOT to spread her legs.

[The Colonel]

You didn't really give a clear answer to my question.

And homosexuality is only immoral to you due to religion.

Perhaps you should read Alfred Kinsev (1948) (who was an American Professor who discovered 50% of men and 28% of women had had same sex relations).

The ass isnt designed to have a C*** shoved up it.
That's what a vagina is for!

Adn your never going to convince me that some guy down on his knee's sucking another man off is my equal.
Equal to a woman... yes... me... NO.

You can believe all that feminista EMASCULATING propaganda crap... but I'm not.

A backside is for sex.

[Lena]

Women have abortions mainly since another wud get in the way of important things like taking care of there family , going to school, and
work .Money is often a factor too.

To moi and about everyone else I know who has had one it's the lesser of two evils . A real horrible regret but the only realistic thing you could do .