Polgara69 wrote: Ask my dad who got custody when my mother walked out when I was a baby.

coolman wrote:coolman wrote:oh you insipid little man.
don't worry, I'll wait while you look it up in the dictionary.

MaxtheGaul wrote:Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.
Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.
Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.

coolman wrote:coolman wrote:coolman wrote:oh you insipid little man.
don't worry, I'll wait while you look it up in the dictionary.
what? No response?
I'm glad you finally agree!
MaxtheGaul wrote:Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.
Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.
Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.
ZiaAries wrote:MaxtheGaul wrote:Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.
Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.
Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.![]()
Absolutely. I feel such a fool. It was so obvious.![]()
Lets hope they upgrade him soon
MaxtheGaul wrote:Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.
Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.
Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.
Fred75 wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Not her child.
Her decision to have sex with a guy she knew nothing about or even had a commitment with!
Her decision as to who she has sex with and when is up to her, and not for you to say.
This is true.
The child's rights NEVER should be considered.
Whether it be the need for a good father or the right to live or die from abortion.
Because SEX is a right and damn the actual consequences of an adult act.
In both cases the rights of the mother rights supersedes everything else.
Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Fred75 wrote:Not her child.
Her decision to have sex with a guy she knew nothing about or even had a commitment with!
Her decision as to who she has sex with and when is up to her, and not for you to say.
This is true.
The child's rights NEVER should be considered.
Whether it be the need for a good father or the right to live or die from abortion.
Because SEX is a right and damn the actual consequences of an adult act.
In both cases the rights of the mother rights supersedes everything else.
The mothers rights will always come before a fetus. While the baby is inside her, it has no rights, the mother has control, and that is the way it should be.
Sometimes I think you wish you were a woman, Fred.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests