Fred75 wrote:
The Colonel is right.
There are not many uncircumcised men in the US.
you have seen many c0cks Fred75. that makes you a cockspert.
i like them too. and i think gays guys rock. you rock Fred75.

Moderator: Silent One
Fred75 wrote:
The Colonel is right.
There are not many uncircumcised men in the US.
i like them too. and i think gays guys rock. you rock Fred75.

The Colonel wrote:If you are referring to my anti-religious stance, get over it.
I am entitled to those views whether you are a god freak or not.
Rebman wrote:The Colonel wrote:If you are referring to my anti-religious stance, get over it.
I am entitled to those views whether you are a god freak or not.
I am not a “god freak”. I am in fact an agnostic.
You are entitled to your anti-religious views, but that does not mean that you are entitled to express them in terms of offensive slurs against other members. By your own definition, this makes you a troll.
You have also lied about religion, e.g. claiming that most priests are paedophiles. You have no evidence for this, because there is no evidence, but you don’t bother about mere technicalities like evidence before spreading your vile bigoted hatred.
Religious threads are far from being the only ones where you have repeatedly been abusive without provocation. For instance, in a recent instance when Shinykatie initiated a thread concerning eco-weddings, your opening reply was: “What a nutter”. If she wants an eco-wedding, she has every right to have one and you have every right to disagree about eco-weddings, but merely being abusive exposes you as being a troll.
You are also a blatant liar, a bully and a bigot in a number of threads, whenever people choose not to do things your preferred way, or have beliefs that you disagree with.
By far the worst instances of your bullying, lying and bigotry have been in your inexplicable and endless interventions in nappy/diaper threads (do you have some sort of repressed nappy fetish?). You have cast offensive slurs against most of the mothers/women on these threads and concocted libellous allegations against the two women who were prepared to stand up to you and your bullying slurs. You then claimed that you had proof that they were one and the same person and that they/(she) have Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, and force their children to wear nappies. When asked by a member to produce your proof that they were the same person and forced their children into nappies, you replied:-
“I know that I am correct. Even if I could prove it, who would listen?”
It would appear therefore that you have libelled these two women without any viable shred of evidence. Saying that you know you are correct is meaningless without evidence. As you had conducted such a campaign of hate against these women, I decided to go through the laborious task of searching through these threads to see if you were correct about there being evidence for these allegations. There was none.
You, Colonel, are probably the most despicable low-life on these forums, and that really is saying something, what with some of the other weirdoes here.
Sharon den Adel wrote:Rebman, Colonel has been here alot longer than you and your 16 posts
and the choir All sang *AMEN! to that.^Andrew Macduff wrote:
Just because he's been here a long time, like a rat in the kitchen, doesn't mean that we have to be respectful of his belligerent methods. A troll is a troll, no matter how long he's been lurking behind the wainscotting.
The Colonel wrote:Hello McMum! Nice to see you back at your old habits.
For a while I thought you were myron. Sincere apologies myron.
Andrew Macduff wrote:Sharon den Adel wrote:Rebman, Colonel has been here alot longer than you and your 16 posts
Just because he's been here a long time, like a rat in the kitchen, doesn't mean that we have to be respectful of his belligerent methods. A troll is a troll, no matter how long he's been lurking behind the wainscotting.
Rebman wrote:The Colonel wrote:Hello McMum! Nice to see you back at your old habits.
For a while I thought you were myron. Sincere apologies myron.
Why am I not in the least bit surprised to hear that? You spend much of your time here claiming that certain members and guests are in fact other members or guests. McMum must have the most aliases of the lot, including the fake McMum that you invented.
Now which particular McMum am I supposed to be? It must be the real one, because you are perfectly aware that you are the fake one, i.e. the one with the seven year old son called Mohammed who you (in your perverted mind) force to wear nappies.
Perhaps I should feel honoured being the umpteenth McMum alias while it lasts. I expect I will be Fred next week and back to being Myron again the following week. Does your fantasy world keep you happy? Have you ever thought about living in the real world for a change? I doubt it, as your alias fantasies are a vital part of your security blanket.
The Colonel wrote:Hell hath no fury like a Scottish nappy wearer scorned.
Rebman wrote:The Colonel wrote:Hell hath no fury like a Scottish nappy wearer scorned.
If anyone knows about that, you should. After all, you are the fake McMum who wears nappies and forces them on poor Mohammed. How is the poor little imaginary fellow by the way? Did he miss you while you were under arrest? I hope you haven’t got him locked away in that fantasy underground bunker where all those dangerous combat aircraft are stored.
The Colonel wrote:The person who posts the McMum posts (with Mohammed) which are indeed amusing, are posted by a member called Thot Gor. Everybody knows this.
I've proven who I am to several members. They know who I am 100%.
You fail McMum.
Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests