THE O'Bumma Thread - Original Vintage Edition

Discuss Social and Political issues that are affecting you. Bash the Politicians!
User avatar
Big Ben
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5745
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:56 pm

THE O'Bumma Thread - Original Vintage Edition

Postby Big Ben on Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:27 am

O'Bumma finally resigns from Trinity Church after pastor phleger made racial remarks against whites and accused America of rape. :shock: His resignation is 20 years too late. :x Probably decided that making sure he is president is more important than his guiding compass and political/racial activism. :roll:

O'Bumma is a radical or a radical sympathizer, a con man who has jobbed the American public into thinking he is fit to run the strongest country on earth. :evil:

The only hope for the US is that barack and michelle will decide they like living in the White House and that they will supress their natural radical beliefs and bitterness, and moderate their policies in order to stay in power. :(
Last edited by Big Ben on Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:48 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
ZiaAries
Cherubim
 
Posts: 21177
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:15 am
Location: United States of America

Postby ZiaAries on Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:15 am

And it only took 20 years. :yikes:

Maybe he is a Late Bloomer.


:rotflmao:
Zia

Image

User avatar
Topic Of Gossip
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:47 am
Location: London

Re: Radicals !!!!

Postby Topic Of Gossip on Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:29 pm

Bushwalker wrote:Really, Big Ben !!!

O'Bama "a radical or radical sympathiser.." !!
:roll:

Get Real !

By foreign standards all three candidates are relatively conservative...
:P

Personally, I doubt that a lot of tories like you could ever recognise a true radical, liberal or socialist - let alone a real-to-life communist - if you tripped over them..


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I have to agree Bushwalker.

O'Bama radical?! :lol:

Jesse Jackson is a lot more radical than O'Bama has ever or will ever be, yet I don't recall when he was running for the candidacy to become president, this much hostility.

Hmmm... so what's different this time? Uhm, oh I know... O'Bama has actually got a chance of winning this time. :lol:

You know O'Bama has black and white parents yet, all his detractors ever see is that he's... black! Why is that? :think:

I have always been brought up to be proud of my black heritage because my parents knew how much the colour of their skin played in the struggle that they had to go through, just to be accepted as normal everyday people. But that in no way means that I then have to hate white people or resent the fact that I'm English. Whoever tries to make that leap or connection is rather stupid and ignorant I feel.

As an aside, I remember when Bush came to power the Republicans made a concerted effort to appeal to the black community in order to secure their votes. They used what was termed "compassionate conservatism". You know I love that phrase because it actually tells you exactly what Conservatives aren't by nature. :wink:
"A dream not bathed in reality, will forever and ever remain a dream."

User avatar
Lena
Angel
 
Posts: 36602
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Kentucky , USA

Postby Lena on Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:28 pm

Obama is very moderate.

He quit the church which was good.

Don't forget McCain chased after the insane preacher Hagee like a dog in heat for support . Then Hagee turns out to be a even bigger hater then Rev.Wright .

Moi's sticking with Obama , he may not have much experience but is smart and means well. More then anyone could say about he fool we have now .McCain is acting too much like little georgey too what with talking about being in Iraq for 100 years , ending social security , and in other ways being too right wing .
Alive in spite of myself and looking at the world .........

User avatar
mogadishu
Queen
 
Posts: 4605
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:19 pm

Postby mogadishu on Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:18 pm

Wright said "God Damn America".
Hagee said Hitler was doing God's work.

Is having a nutty pastor an official prerequisite for being taken seriously in this election?
When Verichip microchipped the Alzheimer patients I remained silent I was not a patient

When Verichip microchipped the Military I did not speak out; I was not in the Military

When they came to microchip me , there was no one left to speak out

User avatar
Lena
Angel
 
Posts: 36602
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Kentucky , USA

Postby Lena on Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:58 pm

:lol:
Alive in spite of myself and looking at the world .........

User avatar
ZiaAries
Cherubim
 
Posts: 21177
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:15 am
Location: United States of America

Postby ZiaAries on Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:17 pm

mogadishu wrote:Wright said "God Damn America".
Hagee said Hitler was doing God's work.

Is having a nutty pastor an official prerequisite for being taken seriously in this election?


Wright was Obama's pastor of 20 years.
Hagee was not McCain's minister. McCain took Hagee's financial support for his campaign. Big big difference.

Obama sat for 20 years listening to Wright's babbling rants.
McCain finds out about Hagee's comments after the donation was made and comments revealed.

One could start to think that religion is a way to hide hate and discrimination by the mouths of these "so-called" and "so-titled" ministers. :roll:
Zia

Image

User avatar
Big Ben
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5745
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:56 pm

Postby Big Ben on Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:17 pm

Liberals don't want to understand the difference between a 20 year close relationship and an endorsement. If endorsements were to be condemned, then O'Bumma should be criticized for anit-semite, racist, radical minister Luis Farrakhan's endorsement of O'Bumma.

Any American who is "moderate" wouldn't stay in the Trinity church for 20 days, let alone 20 years. O'Bumma is 20 years too late and he only quit after he was forced to politically. However, by being 20 years too late, his true colours have shown through.

User avatar
mogadishu
Queen
 
Posts: 4605
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:19 pm

Postby mogadishu on Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:37 pm

If endorsements were to be condemned, then O'Bumma should be criticized for anit-semite, racist, radical minister Luis Farrakhan's endorsement of O'Bumma.


Hmm, no. It's the fact that McCain took Hagee's money that differentiates it from Farrakhan's endorsement of Obama. Of course Obama's relationship with Wright is closer and more longstanding. And sinister. But you've said that many times. What more can be said about it? Now Obama has finally done the right thing and left the church: you don't like that either.

McCain finds out about Hagee's comments after the donation was made and comments revealed.


I doubt it. Hagee endorsed Hitler in the late 1990's.
When Verichip microchipped the Alzheimer patients I remained silent I was not a patient

When Verichip microchipped the Military I did not speak out; I was not in the Military

When they came to microchip me , there was no one left to speak out

User avatar
Lena
Angel
 
Posts: 36602
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Kentucky , USA

Postby Lena on Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:29 pm

Big Ben wrote:Liberals don't want to understand the difference between a 20 year close relationship and an endorsement. If endorsements were to be condemned, then O'Bumma should be criticized for anit-semite, racist, radical minister Luis Farrakhan's endorsement of O'Bumma.

Any American who is "moderate" wouldn't stay in the Trinity church for 20 days, let alone 20 years. O'Bumma is 20 years too late and he only quit after he was forced to politically. However, by being 20 years too late, his true colours have shown through.


No ..................Mc Cain chased after Hagee and if he wasn't scared of the jewish tv media Hagee wud still be on his team . Mc Cain may be a war hero but he has the bad habit of wimping out when it comes to the Republican right .He still has the welcome backing of other religious hate promoters like Pat Robertson and Jimmy Swaggert and isn't telling them to f#ck off............... :roll:

farakhan is a entertainer not a statesman . He's also said to be dying and his cult will probably fall apart when he passes .

Anti semite is a big word moi doesn't get , you here it all the time here like whenever somebody jewish gets in trouble with the law or if israel is criticized or one of Babra Streisand's movies doesn't make money . Farrakhan may not like the jews but Wiki says there not the only semites, other are Arabs , Assyrians , and Phoenicians . So it's not right to say someone hates all of them just since he doesn't like any one of the groups in that semite family .Unless of course what one profesor who comes in the bar calls ADL's master race mentality has them now saying there the only semites...........?

Also read this week end how Oprah Winfrey was a member of Wright's church for awhile but quit since she thought he was too angry . Good for her .

It's going to get to be a very very nasty campaign ................
Alive in spite of myself and looking at the world .........

Cambridge
Queen
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:07 am

Postby Cambridge on Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:23 am

You know O'Bama has black and white parents yet, all his detractors ever see is that he's... black! Why is that?


America is an inherently racist country, that’s why. Any questions? :wave:

User avatar
Topic Of Gossip
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:47 am
Location: London

Postby Topic Of Gossip on Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:56 am

ZiaAries wrote:
mogadishu wrote:Wright said "God Damn America".
Hagee said Hitler was doing God's work.

Is having a nutty pastor an official prerequisite for being taken seriously in this election?


Wright was Obama's pastor of 20 years.
Hagee was not McCain's minister. McCain took Hagee's financial support for his campaign. Big big difference.

Obama sat for 20 years listening to Wright's babbling rants.
McCain finds out about Hagee's comments after the donation was made and comments revealed.

One could start to think that religion is a way to hide hate and discrimination by the mouths of these "so-called" and "so-titled" ministers. :roll:


Zia, you (and the rest of us) come onto FF and constantly listen to Fred's surmons and rants about abortion, gay people being defective and women being whores and sluts.

Now am I to believe that because you happen to be a long standing member of FF you are also in complete agreement with everything that Fred says? I do recall that Fred is/was even on your MPS friends list! :shock:

If you do wholeheartedly agree with Fred's views then yes, you are obviously not quite the person I thought you were but I understand that hearing Fred's rants on a daily basis means you will automatically be brainwashed.

On the other hand... if you do not agree with Fred's outrageous views then how come you are still a serving member of FF? Shouldn't you have quit in disgust that such views can be espoused on a forum that you are a member of? :think:

Now of course you aren't running for the Presidential nomination and Fred is not a Pastor (heavens forbid) but the situation for me between your membership here and Obama's membership of his church is in principle no different.

The fact that you are a member of an organisation - faith, political or otherwise - which has a leader and/or members who preach a form of hatred does not necessarily mean that you too believe (or will be brainwashed into believing) those hateful views also.

Whether you stay or leave that organisation based on those hateful views is also never just a simple decision. Many of us do not agree with Fred's views or half the views expressed in the Brangelina Section for that matter but hey... we're still here! :wink:

However, if our future careers and prosperity depended on the judgement of being associated with the views expressed on this forum then... we might just think twice about being members.

Humans (Obama included) are a little more complicated than is being implied.
"A dream not bathed in reality, will forever and ever remain a dream."

User avatar
myron myron
Demigod
 
Posts: 9438
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:43 am

Postby myron myron on Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:57 am

FF is not a church.

The analogy does not apply.

If you knew what a church is, you would know that it does not apply.

User avatar
ZiaAries
Cherubim
 
Posts: 21177
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:15 am
Location: United States of America

Postby ZiaAries on Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:30 am

Topic Of Gossip wrote:
ZiaAries wrote:
mogadishu wrote:Wright said "God Damn America".
Hagee said Hitler was doing God's work.

Is having a nutty pastor an official prerequisite for being taken seriously in this election?


Wright was Obama's pastor of 20 years.
Hagee was not McCain's minister. McCain took Hagee's financial support for his campaign. Big big difference.

Obama sat for 20 years listening to Wright's babbling rants.
McCain finds out about Hagee's comments after the donation was made and comments revealed.

One could start to think that religion is a way to hide hate and discrimination by the mouths of these "so-called" and "so-titled" ministers. :roll:


Zia, you (and the rest of us) come onto FF and constantly listen to Fred's surmons and rants about abortion, gay people being defective and women being whores and sluts.

Now am I to believe that because you happen to be a long standing member of FF you are also in complete agreement with everything that Fred says? I do recall that Fred is/was even on your MPS friends list! :shock:

If you do wholeheartedly agree with Fred's views then yes, you are obviously not quite the person I thought you were but I understand that hearing Fred's rants on a daily basis means you will automatically be brainwashed.

On the other hand... if you do not agree with Fred's outrageous views then how come you are still a serving member of FF? Shouldn't you have quit in disgust that such views can be espoused on a forum that you are a member of? :think:

Now of course you aren't running for the Presidential nomination and Fred is not a Pastor (heavens forbid) but the situation for me between your membership here and Obama's membership of his church is in principle no different.

The fact that you are a member of an organisation - faith, political or otherwise - which has a leader and/or members who preach a form of hatred does not necessarily mean that you too believe (or will be brainwashed into believing) those hateful views also.

Whether you stay or leave that organisation based on those hateful views is also never just a simple decision. Many of us do not agree with Fred's views or half the views expressed in the Brangelina Section for that matter but hey... we're still here! :wink:

However, if our future careers and prosperity depended on the judgement of being associated with the views expressed on this forum then... we might just think twice about being members.

Humans (Obama included) are a little more complicated than is being implied.


Bad analogy TopicOfGossip. I have the option to block Fred if I want and FF is for my entertainment, not for my spiritual guidance.

I stand by my previous statement. My vote for the President of my country will not be made because of the color of the candidates skin or gender. Humans (Zia included) have the right to vote as they see fit. It's a little more "complicated" than being implied. :wink:

BTW, I haven't made up my mind yet who I will vote for. I have until November to gather all the info and weigh it.
Zia

Image

User avatar
Topic Of Gossip
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:47 am
Location: London

Postby Topic Of Gossip on Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:30 am

ZiaAries wrote:Bad analogy TopicOfGossip. I have the option to block Fred if I want and FF is for my entertainment, not for my spiritual guidance.

I stand by my previous statement. My vote for the President of my country will not be made because of the color of the candidates skin or gender. Humans (Zia included) have the right to vote as they see fit. It's a little more "complicated" than being implied. :wink:

BTW, I haven't made up my mind yet who I will vote for. I have until November to gather all the info and weigh it.


I think my analogy is quite apt. I know many people who go to church for entertainment as well as spiritual guidance!

I'm not trying to get you to vote for anybody, as you said that's your decision, but to denigrate someone because they have an association with somebody else, be that spiritual, sexual, as a mentor or whatever, I think is wrong. That's because you can in no way measure exactly what influence that person has had on that individual's life.

You're putting the influence of spiritual guidance above everything else which isn't right. What about the influence of parents? Spouses? Academic teachers and lecturers? Peers? Friends?

What a person is and what they believe is built up from many, many sources over many years of one's life, not just from a single source.

I have been to churches where the pastor has been frothing at the mouth with tales of fire and brimstone and eternal damnation for those who do not follow his interpretations of the Bible. I'll quite happily listen to the sermon but it doesn't mean I have to agree with or believe what was said. Quite the contrary actually.

As I said... people are a little more complicated than you implied. 8)
"A dream not bathed in reality, will forever and ever remain a dream."

Next

Return to Politics And Social Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest