..................

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues

Moderator: Silent One

Postby Tegenhuid » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:45 pm

Ezekiel wrote:At the risk of having my head cut off (very bad joke I know...) I'll make a reply. It would seem to me that getting circumcised is a very wise decision. I have not read all the books however from what I have leardned it is a good choice.

First of all, based on a documentary based in Africa by CBS (forgive me for not knowing the exact name) thousand of lives lost to STD could be greatly reduced by circumcisions.

Second, The only people who seem to complain about the issue of circumcision are the men who have not yet been circumcised. I can say with confidence that I have yet to hear from a man who said "I can't beleive I got circumcised." It just doesn't seem to happen. So is it just that uncircumcised men fear the procedure. Do they feel people look down on them for not having done so?

Circumcision is no more mutilation, than having your tonsils removed, but because it is relevant to a more prided area of the body it becomes an issue.

I was circumcised at birth. My father was not. Only recently did he get circumcised after which he told me to be sure that my son (when I eventually have one) is circumcised.

I am not jewish, I'm not a Scientist, I'm not a woman. But the afformentioned 3 groups seem to prefer circumcision. (maybe not scientist on a whole)


A case could be made to make it mandatory on adults.
Tegenhuid
 

Postby Tegenhuid » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:51 pm

. wrote:I love a nicely circumcised C***!


I love you. Do you prefer a high or a low circumcision, a loose or a tight?
Tegenhuid
 

Postby Guest » Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:53 pm

. wrote:Circumcised guys are less likely to pass on STDs including HIV, cervical cancer, and are less likely to get penile cancer themselves. Shurely these are benefits enough weighed up against a small operation?


The best circumcision to prevent STD's is to cut the whole inner lining away (low). The thin, vulnerable skin is removed. Also, many women think it looks better.
Guest
 

Postby Tegenhuid » Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:07 pm

. wrote:
leftcoast wrote: Male circumcision does not interfere with orgasm. Also a clitorectomy is a more radical procedure, as far as I understand it.



the foreskin and bit underneath have sensitive cells, that get cut out have far more sensitive than the body of the shaft, but you don't really know or understand that do you?


harden over your babies sexual organ, desensitise it? what are you doing to your baby?

if you do with this knowledge, your sick


In a way, that I like most in circumcision. That a penis gets less sensitive, so he will give more to his woman.
Tegenhuid
 

Postby cosmicB » Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:00 am

That.. and, if he wants to "give more to his woman", he best learn how to use his tongue to make her try to climb the wall backwards... The tongue knows ten times more than the dic will ever know... as the dic knows ten times more than the tongue will ever know... twenty times what most do...
cosmicB
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:26 pm

Postby MaryMcLane » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:37 am

I found this website very helpful: www.sexasnatureintendedit.com
MaryMcLane
 

Postby Polgara69 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:59 am

No its not helpful at all, its a pile of crap. Men dont give a poor performance in the bedroom cos they have been circumcised, they give poor performance cos they dont know what they are doing or they dont care. My boyfriend gives me the best I have ever had (and he doesnt 'bang away till I am so sore I have fake an orgasm') I got bored reading after that bit. Do you do that Adam with your lucky lady? Cause her to chafe and wish she never slept with you cos you are not natural? Balls! That article was written by a woman who had bad experiences with 1 or 2 men and decided all men who are circumcised are crap in bed.
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb
User avatar
Polgara69
M'Lady
 
Posts: 2221
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Postby cosmicB » Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:55 am

Non-circumcised can't tantalize a woman by capturing her cervix in the grove just behind dic's head, easing back a forth in quarter inch movements.. cuz that floppy foreskin only acts as a chamois, scrubbing and polishing things...

It's all about skill, in knowing what sends a woman toward a mind-blowing orgasm... It's about taking your time, tantalizing woman... It's about fulfilling woman to the best of your abilities... It's about off the wall/over the line Spontaneity, for her, not you... It's all about respect for Woman... It's not about you getting your rocks-off... It's about you making her cum as big as she can... If you don't happen, then there's always the next time, maybe a couple hours later... Let the lady rest, to enjoy her slow explosion, and her grins... It's not about you, and your precious private peeled purple pumping penie...
cosmicB
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:26 pm

Postby Polgara69 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:56 pm

Precisely. You just said it. Its all about skill and being as good as you can be for the womans enjoyment. It has sod all to do with how much skin you have. Now pleas edont start rabbiting on about how it does matter. you just said it and I will quote you till the end of time.
No the avvie is not me!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but when you look in the mirror, you are the beholder.

Currently blocking...cosmicb
User avatar
Polgara69
M'Lady
 
Posts: 2221
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Leicester

Postby cosmicB » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:33 pm

If there's that extra flap of skin on the end of the penis, you can't do those weird little things the really sends a woman up the wall... Without that flap of skin, a ridge bump is exposed, that when utilized properly will tantalize the cervix a lot better.. is why I suspect that circumcision might be woman initiated.. but it was probably initiated by monks, so it would be more pleasurable for the fags to suck on them, given that circumcision was and is a religious procedure...

Was that good "rabbiting", or bad "rabbiting"..?
cosmicB
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:26 pm

trimmed dicks

Postby The Woodsman » Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:56 pm

Ezra_Pound wrote:when performed on a child, a non-consenting child, it is a mutilation, pure and simple


Please spare us from your homosexual obsession with foreskins! You talking absolute rubbish about an ancient, transient health measure. The benefits of circumcision far outweigh any teeny little momentary pain of this tiniest of procedures. You lads are just upset that the gay websites won't show pictures of your untrimmed peckers, but spouting a lot of nonsense about the "cruelty" of circumcison won't get you onto the porn sites. The survey at the top of the page says it all: only 13% of women prefer uncircumcised dicks. Circumcised is what the world likes - overwhelmingly, and for good reason. Grow up and get over it.
The Woodsman
 

Postby cosmicB » Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:26 am

Yeah!.. what he said.. and I've still got my work bench, and this razor sharp meat clever... Circumcisions $25... "WHACK!".. Done!.. and you get your choice of sucker...
cosmicB
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:26 pm

Postby cosmicB » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:22 am

Better yet... What do girls think of guys who truly know how to use their dics, tongues, and hands, to fully please a Woman..? It doesn't really matter if it's peeled or natural, short, or horse.. it's all about technique, and respect... A Woman needs at least two hours of foreplay... Any less is merely degrees of "r****"... For too many, "foreplay" is apply some vaseline to the dic.. then shove it in, pump about fifty times, squirt, and fall asleep... That they call "making love"... I calls it "thht"... No wonder too many Women never have orgasms... They should send their boys to my garage work bench.. and lets not forget the $25 fee...
cosmicB
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:26 pm

Re: What do women think of circumcised guys? Please post!

Postby Mac » Mon Jul 14, 2008 5:25 am

Ezra_Pound wrote:I'm new here, so, hello everyone!

Anyway, I'm not circumcised, and was thinking about it. I've heard women like it, and when they've had both to prefer, tend to prefer cut. Is this true? ...... .
If you have to have one of those things then get it circumcised.
:D :girl: :angel: :D
User avatar
Mac
Duchess
 
Posts: 2582
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:39 pm

Postby cosmicB » Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:20 pm

Women like a lot of things: cleanliness, gentleness, tenderness, respect, kindness, love, romance, laughter, softness, hardness, caress, lots of money... If you want to see the dics women prefer, then peek into the women's triple-x pix sites.. "playgirl" for example... Do you research.. then visit my workbench for your cosmetic surgery... No guarantees.. only that you'll do the funny-dance for the longest time...


_______________


"If you have to have one of those things then get it circumcised."
..made me think, if you have two of those things, get one circumcised, and leave the other 0-natural.. then you'll have the best of both worlds... which makes me wonder.. has anyone got two, in tandem..? That would be the ultimate fuk... Get one fixed, and leave the other dirdy...

So can anyone tell me..? Are those flaps of wrinkly skin that they call "labia", which look like testicle sacs.. are they just empty testicle bags..? Do they ever puff-up when some ladies get aroused..?
cosmicB
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5292
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:26 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests