
ZiaAries wrote:I don't portray women as weak. A woman stricken with breast cancer and fighting for her life would be in a WEAKENED state while her mutherfucker scum of a husband was not taking care of her while he kept the company of a skank other woman.
Cam, I'm not blind to the article you present. I whole-heartedly believe women are the stronger sex. However that does not change what Edward did to his wife and family. I think the article appears to be your attempt to sweep Edward's true pond-scum character under the rug.
Now there!
I don't portray women as weak. A woman stricken with breast cancer and fighting for her life would be in a WEAKENED state while her mutherfucker scum of a husband was not taking care of her while he kept the company of a skank other woman.
Cam, I'm not blind to the article you present. I whole-heartedly believe women are the stronger sex. However that does not change what Edward did to his wife and family. I think the article appears to be your attempt to sweep Edward's true pond-scum character under the rug.
Now there.

ZiaAries wrote:I'm not demeaning her at all. Really.
I do agree with you that Edwards is beneath her. He probably has no clue that he is though.
I don't understand why wives of politicians stick by their cheating husband's side the way they do. I don't believe the reason they do is all about love or vows either.
Big Ben wrote:Elizabeth edwards is a victim.
We're not talking about an ordinary situation where she could kick her husband in the balls and leave him for having an affair. Rather, she is stricken with cancer and her spouse went off and shot his rocks off, probably many times if it is his child.
I thought liberals were supposed to be the compassionate ones. True compassion is applying it to the right situations, rather than misusing it to promote the social cause of the day.
Cambridge wrote:
That woman are automatically victims is as demeaning to women as Jesse Jackson’s vision of the role Blacks should play as beggin' the massa fo mo welfare.

Cambridge wrote: No one who takes charge permits themselves to be called a victim.

mogadishu wrote:Cambridge wrote: No one who takes charge permits themselves to be called a victim.
I disagree. A very popular elderly lady I know (well liked for her positive attitude, wisdom and determination) was recently burgled. Shes' not the complaining type, but still suffered post traumatic flashbacks. In my view, she can be legitimately called a victim of crime, despite never having defaulted on her duty of care to herself.
I can't really see what point you're trying to make here, Cambridge. Maybe I'm stupid.

mogadishu wrote:Cambridge wrote: No one who takes charge permits themselves to be called a victim.
I disagree. A very popular elderly lady I know (well liked for her positive attitude, wisdom and determination) was recently burgled. Shes' not the complaining type, but still suffered post traumatic flashbacks. In my view, she can be legitimately called a victim of crime, despite never having defaulted on her duty of care to herself.
I can't really see what point you're trying to make here, Cambridge. Maybe I'm stupid.

Return to Politics And Social Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests