ADIOS COLONEL

[ZiaAries]

I think it's might be good that the Colonel take some time away. This is just a forum for fun and no reason for one stressing themselves out.
Yesterday he got so angry and admitted so, that he posted something that I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the US Homeland Security, Internet Division doesn't check it out and follow up on his IP.

I like the Colonel too and I don't want him to get himself in trouble by taking an internet forum so seriously that it starts to affect him personally. I am surprised, and disappointed as well, that he loses his cool and high-tails it out of here. It's not what I would expect from a man that claims to lead other men in battle.

Colonel, I hope you take a good breather and come back refreshed with a brighter perspective. Stay well. XXO

[The Colonel]

Don't be so silly Zia.

Everyone here knows how I deplore nuclear weapons.

However, some on this forum who think the UK (and by which I mean the government) has to ask "permission" from the US to launch our Trident's, and that we do not have the capability to strike anywhere in the world (the irony being that Trident and before that Polaris were designed to strike the USSR, and thus, have a great range) is someone who is either a) an idiot, or b) a forum troublemaker. Both is my suggestion.

While the UK's nuclear strength is small, it is more than big enough. The consequences of nuclear war are unthinkable, and I sincerely hope that mankind never has to endure it.

Indeed, Churchill himself said that the next war (meaning WW3) would have too high a price for mankind to bear - and he is absolutely correct.

These forum idiots have no understanding of these realities, and need to get it in their heads that the NATO "big three" of the US, UK and France have more than sufficient firepower to deal with all threats.

And as I said earlier, Britain is capable of defending the rest of Europe (i.e Poland) from Russia if need be. America is far from being the only nation able to strike and attack in force. Britain has proved her ability in the Falklands, in Afghanistan and in Iraq.

I also pay tribute to the 10 brave French soldiers killed in Afghanistan today - who like Britain, have the means to defend Europe, and who fight for liberty, truth and justice.

[myron myron]

Don't be so silly Zia.

Everyone here knows how I deplore nuclear weapons.

However, some on this forum who think the UK (and by which I mean the government) has to ask "permission" from the US to launch our Trident's, and that we do not have the capability to strike anywhere in the world (the irony being that Trident and before that Polaris were designed to strike the USSR, and thus, have a great range) is someone who is either a) an idiot, or b) a forum troublemaker. Both is my suggestion.

While the UK's nuclear strength is small, it is more than big enough. The consequences of nuclear war are unthinkable, and I sincerely hope that mankind never has to endure it.

Indeed, Churchill himself said that the next war (meaning WW3) would have too high a price for mankind to bear - and he is absolutely correct.

These forum idiots have no understanding of these realities, and need to get it in their heads that the NATO "big three" of the US, UK and France have more than sufficient firepower to deal with all threats.

And as I said earlier, Britain is capable of defending the rest of Europe (i.e Poland) from Russia if need be. America is far from being the only nation able to strike and attack in force. Britain has proved her ability in the Falklands, in Afghanistan and in Iraq.

I also pay tribute to the 10 brave French soldiers killed in Afghanistan today - who like Britain, have the means to defend Europe, and who fight for liberty, truth and justice.

What a crock . . .

[The Colonel]

Does anyone hear something?

Ah, no. It's only Smegma face.