Moderator: Silent One
James Barnes4 wrote:Sorry if I'm ignorant at some point, just reading a lot of c**p around the internet about stretch marks is so depressing and misleading. Could you please bring me back to the basics as why can't the body differentiate normal tissue from scar tissue? As I know, then the body works in the way to survive, it doesn't care about the aesthetic look, so when the stretch mark occurs, it just seals it off as if to protect from blood loss. What can be done to help the body find that ''bad'' tissue? Also, why are there raised and sunken stretch marks? Is it just because some people's bodies generate more scar tissue than others? What would happen it a laser was used to melt the scar tissue away, would it end up looking like a regular, sunken stretch mark? I just think it is so simple, yet so complicated, because the science of using lasers like Fraxel and ActiveFX is that it removes the damaged tissue causing microscopic wounds for the body to heal itself, thus the damaged tissue is replaced by the body with new, undamaged tissue. What seems to be the problem with this, shouldn't it make the stretch mark go away, not just improve it?
americangirl wrote:Mai--please just ignore that random guest that is posting.
And, I have heard that Makeupartistschoice.com has good TCA peel kits--but the people that used this kit was using it for Acne Scarring and not Stretch Marks. I got the glycolic acid peel kit from them && at first it seemed to not get much of a reaction on my skin but I have since tried J's footfiling method (lightly of course) before I apply it and I get a reaction.
And James Barnes refer to page 410 for a detailed description of starting a TCA peel treatment. A lot of the questions you will probably have are answered on that page and a few following pages. Also what sites have you looked at where people have gotten rid of stretch marks with TCA? I'd like to take a look at those places.
americangirl <3
Kojiro wrote:As far as laser goes, the problem with just burning away the scar tissue, is it will be replaced with more scar tissue. From what I understand, your body is able to improve the stretch marks because when you poke small holes into the scar tissue you trigger your body to produce more collagen which will help "puff" up the skin so that it isn't quite as sunken. In reality, you aren't really getting rid of the scar tissue, you are just making it closer to normal skin.
Mai wrote:Platinum skin care has been highly reviewed here in terms of service and product quality. It is however based in the states making shipping a bit of a problem if you don't live there. Also, its possible to buy TCA off ebay but then you can't guarantee the quality of the product you buy...
Lastly, you said you are just starting out, it's probably better not to jump right in with TCA, again, read over the past 25 pages, you will find you should start out with glycolic to get your skin used to it.
Oh and btw, if any of you have anything to say to me, try and not me too much of a baby and not post anonymously, ok?
much love.
oh and btw, since I do live in Asia I had hopes that there was some strange, secret traditional treatment Asian women use for sm. I have been to several doctors who just look at me like uh-uh. but i will let you know if I find anything. If this continues I might actually get desperate enough to try beauty-tek, because I really can't find a single independent review of it.
. wrote:Kojiro wrote:As far as laser goes, the problem with just burning away the scar tissue, is it will be replaced with more scar tissue. From what I understand, your body is able to improve the stretch marks because when you poke small holes into the scar tissue you trigger your body to produce more collagen which will help "puff" up the skin so that it isn't quite as sunken. In reality, you aren't really getting rid of the scar tissue, you are just making it closer to normal skin.
hi kojiro,
isnt this exactly what needling does?
. wrote:what did the deepfx cost?
Tracy212 wrote:. wrote:what did the deepfx cost?
I paid $2,200 for the Active FX for the abdomen. The price quoted to me for the Deep FX by the same doctor was $3,995 for the abdomen, which she said she would knock off $1,000 since I had already tried the Active FX. I think I'm going to wait at this point.
I do believe the ultimate cure lies somewhere in laser technology, most likely with a combination of lasers and not just one laser (sort of like the article from the doctor in Philadelphia). We're just not completely there yet. My advice would be save your pennies now so that when that technology is perfected, you'll have stashed away the funds in advance. I also believe the current laser technology will work for some folks. The Active FX did get rid of some of my very small stretch marks and made noticable improvement to the larger ones. After everything I've tried over the last many, many years (creams, lasers, peels, vitamins.....never tried carboxy or needling), lasers definitely did the most for me, with creams (Trilastin SR) being the second runner up.
I'm not a believer in peels, though from my own experience, I do think they help blend the marks better even if they don't remove them. This can still be a great way to make some difference for stretch marks until the laser technology is perfected to remove them (or whatever technology is ultimately found to cure them).
Tracy
James Barnes wrote:Though I've read about what stretch marks are and how they form, I don't really know how they look in the skin. I personally imagine 3 layers of skin with a V shape scarring in through the epidermis to the dermis. Is this an accurate image I imagine? I mean, stretch marks don't penetrate all the dermis? I imagine that at least some part of the dermis beneath the stretch marks is left untouched, because the skin breaks from the upper side not the lower. Right? I think if the stretch mark went through all the dermis it would not stop there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests