Oil Reserves

The place to introduce yourself. A place to go if you just want a natter. Come in and chat away!

Moderator: Silent One

Guest
 

Oil Reserves

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:21 pm

WORLD'S OIL WILL RUN OUT IN TEN YEARS

The latest measurements confirm that the world's oil and natural gas supplies are running out too fast. At some time between 2010 and 2020 the world's supply of oil and gas will fall below the level required to meet international demand.

The US government is aware that we are about to endure a disastrous international energy shortage. According to Dr James McKenzie, a senior member of the climate change programme at the World Resources Institute in Washington, USA: "That's why we went to war in Iraq."

We always knew the world's oil reserves would run out eventually. The oil was formed by natural geological processes which occurred over millions of years. Oil consumption presently exceeds 25 billion barrels a year and demand continues to spiral upward, out of control. The outcome is inevitable.

In the 21st Century we rely on oil (petrol) and gas for transport - cars, lorries, ships, aircraft - as well as electrical power. We cannot survive without oil and gas, and when the supply runs out the great engine of Western civilization will finally grind to a halt. We are heading for an event that will be remembered as one of the great disasters of human history, and life is going to get harder for everybody as the day of reckoning draws nearer.

In the years ahead, wars will be fought over oil and fuel as the oil-dependent superpowers struggle in vein to preserve our unsustainable way of life. We are entering a period of great change and there are be difficult times ahead. The process has already begun. Students of prophecy will be familiar with certain relevant verses from Christian scripture concerning the signs of the end times (Matt. 24.8; Mk 13.8, Rom. 8.22; Rev. 12.03, 21.1-4). As it was translated in 1961 in the New English Bible: "With these things, the birth pangs of the new age begin" (Mt.24:8; Mk.13:8). Whether you are religious or secular, you should be aware that the tide of history is turning.

In North America, where we use far more oil than anywhere else on Earth, the vast majority (71%) of electrical power generation is entirely dependent on fossil fuels - coal (52%), gas (16%), and oil (3%). The world's natural gas is running out along with the oil, and the coal supply is not unlimited either. Nuclear energy contributes only one-fifth to the US power network, and 7% of power is hydroelectric. Only 2% of US electricity production is from renewable sources. As we continue to burning up the world's dwindling fossil energy sources at a terrifying rate, we simultaneously unleash catastrophic damage to the natural environment.

The Insider recently reported a wave of four major electrical power outages which struck the US; then the UK; followed by Denmark and Sweden; and then Italy, Switzerland, Austria and France. The effects only lasted a few hours, but each case was the biggest power failure in the history of the affected country. These massive power cuts were separated by a matter of days. The governments were only practicing this time. This is just the beginning.

It would be prudent to pursue alternative energy sources before it is too late, but the oil corporations will never allow this to happen. So important is oil as a resource that it brings great wealth and power to those who control it. Consequently, our corrupt politicians, whose power is lavishly funded with oil money, prefer to serve the short-term interests of greedy oil executives than the long-term interests of ordinary people like you. But as long as we have food in our bellies and entertainment to keep us busy, why should we care? Thus, it is the immorality and indifference of our species that ultimately leads to our own demise.

Nothing lasts forever. Like all the great civilizations in the past, ours has a limited life-span. A few years from now the Westernized world will reach the point where there is no longer enough fuel to sustain civilization in its present form. This will literally be the end of civilization as we know it.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:43 pm

"At some point, however, production simply won't be able to match demand. Oil is an exhaustible resource: The more you produce, the less remains in the ground, and the harder it is to bring up that remainder. We won't be "out of oil"; a vast amount will still be flowing — just not quickly enough to satisfy demand. And as any economist can tell you, when supply falls behind demand, bad things happen.

During the 1979 Iranian revolution, the last time oil production fell off significantly, world oil prices hit the modern equivalent of $80 a barrel. And that, keep in mind, was a temporary decline. If world oil production were to truly peak and begin a permanent decline, the effect would be staggering: Prices would not come back down. Any part of the global economy dependent on cheap energy — which is to say, pretty much everything these days — would be changed forever."

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:38 pm

Back in 1974 they said the world would run out of oil in ten years. As we now know, it didn't.

In any case, when they switch on the Hadron accelerator next Wednesday, the world is going to disappear up its own arse, so who cares?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:34 pm

. wrote:Back in 1974 they said the world would run out of oil in ten years. As we now know, it didn't.

In any case, when they switch on the Hadron accelerator next Wednesday, the world is going to disappear up its own arse, so who cares?


supply won't meet demand.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:10 pm

. wrote:Back in 1974 they said the world would run out of oil in ten years. As we now know, it didn't.

In any case, when they switch on the Hadron accelerator next Wednesday, the world is going to disappear up its own arse, so who cares?


Not the Hadron accelerator :shock:

End of the world
 

Postby End of the world on Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:05 pm

It's gonna be GREAT!!! Just like Mad Max :D

The population will deminish to a sensible size, as the food shortages kick in (when there's no fuel to deliver the food to supermarkets) & it's gonna be every man for himself. I can't wait :D

Fuel will be £50 a litre & it will keep all you tossers of the roads.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:34 pm

End of the world wrote:It's gonna be GREAT!!! Just like Mad Max :D

The population will deminish to a sensible size, as the food shortages kick in (when there's no fuel to deliver the food to supermarkets) & it's gonna be every man for himself. I can't wait :D

Fuel will be £50 a litre & it will keep all you tossers of the roads.




What about people stranded in the countryside, they will have to use horse and carts. Only the rich will be able to afford petrol :lol:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:35 pm

. wrote:Back in 1974 they said the world would run out of oil in ten years. As we now know, it didn't.

In any case, when they switch on the Hadron accelerator next Wednesday, the world is going to disappear up its own arse, so who cares?


http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/large-hadron-collider-could-create-wormholes-a-gateway-for-time-travelers/

As we get closer to the grand opening of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, Switzerland, it seems the predictions as to what we might get from the high energy particle accelerator are becoming more complex and outlandish. Not only could the LHC generate enough energy to create particles that exist in other dimensions, it may also produce "unparticles", a possible source for dark matter. Now, the energy may be so focused that even the fabric of space-time may be pulled apart to create a wormhole, not to a different place, but a different time. Also, if there are any time travellers out there, we are most likely to see them in a few weeks…

If you could travel back in time, where would you go? Actually it's a trick question: you couldn't travel back in time unless there was a time "machine" already built in the past. The universe's very first time traveller would therefore only be able to travel back to when the machine he/she was using was built. This is one restriction that puts pay to those romantic ideas that we could travel back in time to see the dinosaurs; there were no time machines back then (that we know of), so nothing to travel back to. And until we create a time machine, we won't be seeing any travelers any time soon.

However, Prof Irina Aref'eva and Dr Igor Volovich, mathematical physicists at the Steklov Mathematical Institute in Moscow believe the energies generated by the subatomic collisions in the LHC may be powerful enough to rip space-time itself, spawning wormholes. A wormhole not only has the ability to take a shortcut between two positions in space, it can also take a shortcut between two positions in time. So, the LHC could be the first ever "time machine", providing future time travelers with a documented time and place where a wormhole "opened up" into our time-line. This year could therefore be "Year Zero", the base year by which time travel is limited to.

Relativity doesn't dispute this idea, but the likelihood of a person passing through time is slim-to-impossible when the dimensions of a possible wormhole will be at the sub-atomic level at best and it would only be open for a brief moment. Testing for the presence of a man-made wormhole would be difficult even if we knew what we were looking for (perhaps a small loss in energy during collision, as energy escapes through the wormhole?).

As if that didn't discourage you from hoping to use wormholes for time travel, Dr Brian Cox of the University of Manchester says: "The energies of billions of cosmic rays that have been hitting the Earth's atmosphere for five billion years far exceed those we will create at the LHC, so by this logic time travellers should be here already." As far as we know, they're not.

Anub
 

Postby Anub on Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:21 pm

. wrote:
. wrote:Back in 1974 they said the world would run out of oil in ten years. As we now know, it didn't.

In any case, when they switch on the Hadron accelerator next Wednesday, the world is going to disappear up its own arse, so who cares?


http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/large-hadron-collider-could-create-wormholes-a-gateway-for-time-travelers/

As we get closer to the grand opening of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, Switzerland, it seems the predictions as to what we might get from the high energy particle accelerator are becoming more complex and outlandish. Not only could the LHC generate enough energy to create particles that exist in other dimensions, it may also produce "unparticles", a possible source for dark matter. Now, the energy may be so focused that even the fabric of space-time may be pulled apart to create a wormhole, not to a different place, but a different time. Also, if there are any time travellers out there, we are most likely to see them in a few weeks…

If you could travel back in time, where would you go? Actually it's a trick question: you couldn't travel back in time unless there was a time "machine" already built in the past. The universe's very first time traveller would therefore only be able to travel back to when the machine he/she was using was built. This is one restriction that puts pay to those romantic ideas that we could travel back in time to see the dinosaurs; there were no time machines back then (that we know of), so nothing to travel back to. And until we create a time machine, we won't be seeing any travelers any time soon.

However, Prof Irina Aref'eva and Dr Igor Volovich, mathematical physicists at the Steklov Mathematical Institute in Moscow believe the energies generated by the subatomic collisions in the LHC may be powerful enough to rip space-time itself, spawning wormholes. A wormhole not only has the ability to take a shortcut between two positions in space, it can also take a shortcut between two positions in time. So, the LHC could be the first ever "time machine", providing future time travelers with a documented time and place where a wormhole "opened up" into our time-line. This year could therefore be "Year Zero", the base year by which time travel is limited to.

Relativity doesn't dispute this idea, but the likelihood of a person passing through time is slim-to-impossible when the dimensions of a possible wormhole will be at the sub-atomic level at best and it would only be open for a brief moment. Testing for the presence of a man-made wormhole would be difficult even if we knew what we were looking for (perhaps a small loss in energy during collision, as energy escapes through the wormhole?).

As if that didn't discourage you from hoping to use wormholes for time travel, Dr Brian Cox of the University of Manchester says: "The energies of billions of cosmic rays that have been hitting the Earth's atmosphere for five billion years far exceed those we will create at the LHC, so by this logic time travellers should be here already." As far as we know, they're not.


What an absolute, utter load of 8OLLOCKS!!!
It is blatantly obvious to me that you do not have a full grasp of particle physics / string theory & time travel. Your views are simply wild speculation.

Go back to watching Stargate :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:16 pm

The critical word there is "theory", in other words wild speculation.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:37 pm

Anub wrote:
. wrote:
. wrote:Back in 1974 they said the world would run out of oil in ten years. As we now know, it didn't.

In any case, when they switch on the Hadron accelerator next Wednesday, the world is going to disappear up its own arse, so who cares?


http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/large-hadron-collider-could-create-wormholes-a-gateway-for-time-travelers/

As we get closer to the grand opening of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, Switzerland, it seems the predictions as to what we might get from the high energy particle accelerator are becoming more complex and outlandish. Not only could the LHC generate enough energy to create particles that exist in other dimensions, it may also produce "unparticles", a possible source for dark matter. Now, the energy may be so focused that even the fabric of space-time may be pulled apart to create a wormhole, not to a different place, but a different time. Also, if there are any time travellers out there, we are most likely to see them in a few weeks…

If you could travel back in time, where would you go? Actually it's a trick question: you couldn't travel back in time unless there was a time "machine" already built in the past. The universe's very first time traveller would therefore only be able to travel back to when the machine he/she was using was built. This is one restriction that puts pay to those romantic ideas that we could travel back in time to see the dinosaurs; there were no time machines back then (that we know of), so nothing to travel back to. And until we create a time machine, we won't be seeing any travelers any time soon.

However, Prof Irina Aref'eva and Dr Igor Volovich, mathematical physicists at the Steklov Mathematical Institute in Moscow believe the energies generated by the subatomic collisions in the LHC may be powerful enough to rip space-time itself, spawning wormholes. A wormhole not only has the ability to take a shortcut between two positions in space, it can also take a shortcut between two positions in time. So, the LHC could be the first ever "time machine", providing future time travelers with a documented time and place where a wormhole "opened up" into our time-line. This year could therefore be "Year Zero", the base year by which time travel is limited to.

Relativity doesn't dispute this idea, but the likelihood of a person passing through time is slim-to-impossible when the dimensions of a possible wormhole will be at the sub-atomic level at best and it would only be open for a brief moment. Testing for the presence of a man-made wormhole would be difficult even if we knew what we were looking for (perhaps a small loss in energy during collision, as energy escapes through the wormhole?).

As if that didn't discourage you from hoping to use wormholes for time travel, Dr Brian Cox of the University of Manchester says: "The energies of billions of cosmic rays that have been hitting the Earth's atmosphere for five billion years far exceed those we will create at the LHC, so by this logic time travellers should be here already." As far as we know, they're not.


What an absolute, utter load of 8OLLOCKS!!!
It is blatantly obvious to me that you do not have a full grasp of particle physics / string theory & time travel. Your views are simply wild speculation.

Go back to watching Stargate :roll:


tell that to the guy who wrote the article fucktard. It's a copy and paste :lol:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:40 pm

. wrote:The critical word there is "theory", in other words wild speculation.


If people didn't speculate or theorize, geeks like you wouldn't have the likes of Star Trek & Dr who :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:38 pm

Please read the posting before mine where the writer accused the previous writer of wild speculation and of having no knowledge of string THEORY. Now think about it, do you see what I meant?

I would consider the absence of Star Trek (We come in peace, shoot to kill!) and Dr Who as a reason to be thankful for small mercies.

Do please try to be less objectionable.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:05 pm

We have about 1.2 trillion barrels of conventional oil in the ground that is recoverable. Which is more than we have burned so far in the last 150 years. We also have over 3 trillion barrels of unconventional oil. So we have more than enough to turn this planet into venus version 2.


Return to General Chit-Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests