Well now you've heard it. The Biden and Palin debate. Weak...weak...weak for her.
What's with this deer-in-the-headlignts look. Throughout the whole theing she had this scared look. As well she should have...she was dealing with the school teacher.
The theme started when she called Joe Biden, "Senator O'biden." That revealed a lot.
Then she referred to the Talibani in Iraq. ???
And what's with this pronouncing "ing" as "in". Is she trying to convince us that she is an illiterate redneck. And what's with the pronounciation of nuclear as "nucular?" The word is nuclear: "New" with the word "Clear," following. It's not a difficult to grasp. But it's a holdover from the Bush administration, and it appears that the GWB (perhaps Cheney) was involoved in her preparation.
She made a fatal error whan she said, "the Bush administration was not a failure." Is she really defending the GWB administration.
And her argument that the democrats are looking back is weak...weak...weak. What the democrats are sayin is, what is the justification for the Iraq war? If that's not a legitimate question, then the socialist republicans had better be looking for a hole to hide in. They started this war, and they are the ones who don't want it to be questioned, and it's a question that's going to be asked whether McCain Palin like it or not.
Like most socialist republicans, she uses sound bites. How many times did you hear, "the commanding general," "evil," "blunders," "generals in the field," and "commanders?"
She claims she is a "Washington outsider," but she claims that Biden didn't tell why he voted for certain legislation, but she didn't even realize that her own questio had already been answered.
In the end, it was a difficult, but predictable response. But we don'w want predictable responses when you coma a'beggin for $700-billion.
Loading
