Lenin, Hitler, Zedong and Sung quotes

[Stalfos]

http://thinkexist.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin/
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... lenin.html
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... itler.html
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... edong.html
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... _sung.html

Demoralize the enemy from within by surprise, terror, sabotage, assassination. This is the war of the future.

How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think.

Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism

All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.

Hmmmm, I wonder how the Colonel will try to dodge this quote.

The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation

The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency

A lie told often enough becomes the truth

If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.

Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.

Fascism is capitalism in decay

The day of individual happiness has passed.

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.

The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.

To read too many books is harmful.

Kim Il Sung, the founder of one of the biggest, if not the biggest, communist country in the world, North Korea:

The most important thing in our war preparations is to teach all our people to hate U.S. imperialism. Otherwise, we will not be able to defeat the U.S. imperialists who boast of their technological superiority.

Damn, these communists and Hitler surely would adore the Colonel, Chairman, ToS, Lena, Karrin and other leftists on this forum!

[The Chairman]

[Stalfos]

How the left in this forum are trying to ignore these quotes!

[The Chairman]

[The Colonel]

Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.

CHRISTIANITY!

[Stalfos]

Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.

CHRISTIANITY!

Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism

All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.

The Colonel has failed to proof Christianity a terrorist religion. Therefore, these anti-Christianity comments have absolutely no meaning whatsoever.

Thread: Better start teaching the Koran to your kids!

I will defend the Crown.

My reply to that which you have been dodging:

First of all, a monarchism is wrong and that's putting it lightly. Monarchism is nepotism. It favors people from a particular family because they are from that family. That's 100% wrong because if you are talented in doing something, that doesn't mean that your children will be equally talented. Talent and intelligence is not being passed down from one generation to another. It can have influence, but it is not being passed down from one generation to another. That's a scientific fact. Thus, monarchism, like anything else that is nepotism, is wrong and makes no sense. It's dangerous to give someone without having any intelligence or talents so much power. The queen or king may have the IQ of a mentally retarded person and still be given such powers. That's insane.

Secondly, monarchism is also oligarchism, which means that monarchy is the "rule of a few". Only a particular group of people is given certain ruling rights. That is always wrong. Collectivism and oligarchism can only lead and operate under a big government. By default, an oligarchy is a form of autocracy. Thus, a type of dictatorship because only a few are in charge. The government must be small and serve only to protect its people. Nothing more, nothing less. Anything more than a small government means automatically that there will be less individual rights and freedoms.

With that said, it is no surprise that the UK has no freedoms or individual rights. There is no such a thing as the First Amendment in the UK, like there is in the USA. The UK law is crap and makes no sense. That's why Jacqui Smit is able to r**** freedom of speech in the UK. Nobody can sue her because the UK law guarantees no freedom of speech. The UK had adopted the EU constitution crap on freedom of speech but that's good enough for the UK, it offers too much freedom. Thus, the UK has imposed a number of addition restrictions on free speech, which literally put religion ABOVE the freedom of speech. UK laws on freedom of speech are without a doubt the worst in the West. Contrary to what you claim, the UK is not civilized. A civilized country guarantees individual rights and freedoms to its people. The UK does not do so.

You have recently posted a message containing verses from the Bible, in order to proof it violent and whatnot. So under the "free speech" laws of the UK, you can be persecuted. That's right. Go on most defending your noble and sovereign lady and lords, while you violate their laws. THEY PUT UNPROVEN CLAIMS ABOVE THE HUMAN RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

Even worse, the UK is in DEFENSE of Muslims. The UK is full of Muslims. Islam has only one goal in the UK: the overthrow of the UK government. Islam instructs its followers to overthrow all constitutions and states in favor of an Islamic state and the Shariah law (which sentences people to beheadings and amputations). But you are not allows to criticize them because you have a piece of S*** law and no freedom of speech in your "civilized" country. According to the law of the UK, you are worse than the Muslims.

The UK is a disgusting country with disgusting laws. It's a dictatorship run (literally) by retards. No individual rights, no freedoms.

Admit defeat or defend your arguments

[The Chairman]

The UK is a disgusting country with disgusting laws. It's a dictatorship run (literally) by retards. No individual rights, no freedoms.

What qualifies you to make that statement..?

[Stalfos]

The UK is a disgusting country with disgusting laws. It's a dictatorship run (literally) by retards. No individual rights, no freedoms.

What qualifies you to make that statement..?

Ah, finally a bit of a normal question, but that question requires you to answer one first: why should I answer or respond to whatever you, an authoritarian, says? Why should you be taken serious if you don't accept opposing views?

What else can a country be called that bans Geert Wilders and Michael Savage for their opinions? But then again, you are an authoritarian, so I don't except you to value freedoms.

First of all, a monarchism is wrong and that's putting it lightly. Monarchism is nepotism. It favors people from a particular family because they are from that family. That's 100% wrong because if you are talented in doing something, that doesn't mean that your children will be equally talented. Talent and intelligence is not being passed down from one generation to another. It can have influence, but it is not being passed down from one generation to another. That's a scientific fact. Thus, monarchism, like anything else that is nepotism, is wrong and makes no sense. It's dangerous to give someone without having any intelligence or talents so much power. The queen or king may have the IQ of a mentally retarded person and still be given such powers. That's insane.

Secondly, monarchism is also oligarchism, which means that monarchy is the "rule of a few". Only a particular group of people is given certain ruling rights. That is always wrong. Collectivism and oligarchism can only lead and operate under a big government. By default, an oligarchy is a form of autocracy. Thus, a type of dictatorship because only a few are in charge. The government must be small and serve only to protect its people. Nothing more, nothing less. Anything more than a small government means automatically that there will be less individual rights and freedoms.

With that said, it is no surprise that the UK has no freedoms or individual rights. There is no such a thing as the First Amendment in the UK, like there is in the USA. The UK law is crap and makes no sense. That's why Jacqui Smit is able to r**** freedom of speech in the UK. Nobody can sue her because the UK law guarantees no freedom of speech. The UK had adopted the EU constitution crap on freedom of speech but that's good enough for the UK, it offers too much freedom. Thus, the UK has imposed a number of addition restrictions on free speech, which literally put religion ABOVE the freedom of speech. UK laws on freedom of speech are without a doubt the worst in the West. Contrary to what you claim, the UK is not civilized. A civilized country guarantees individual rights and freedoms to its people. The UK does not do so.

You have recently posted a message containing verses from the Bible, in order to proof it violent and whatnot. So under the "free speech" laws of the UK, you can be persecuted. That's right. Go on most defending your noble and sovereign lady and lords, while you violate their laws. THEY PUT UNPROVEN CLAIMS ABOVE THE HUMAN RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

Even worse, the UK is in DEFENSE of Muslims. The UK is full of Muslims. Islam has only one goal in the UK: the overthrow of the UK government. Islam instructs its followers to overthrow all constitutions and states in favor of an Islamic state and the Shariah law (which sentences people to beheadings and amputations). But you are not allows to criticize them because you have a piece of S*** law and no freedom of speech in your "civilized" country. According to the law of the UK, you are worse than the Muslims.

The UK is a disgusting country with disgusting laws. It's a dictatorship run (literally) by retards. No individual rights, no freedoms.

[The Chairman]

Geert Wilders and Michael Savage..? 2 men qualify you to insult Britain..? Friendly fire would qualify me to insult yours but I don't stoop that low.

[Stalfos]

Geert Wilders and Michael Savage..? 2 men qualify you to insult Britain..? Friendly fire would qualify me to insult yours but I don't stoop that low.

Click here for the reply.

[The Chairman]

Geert Wilders and Michael Savage..? 2 men qualify you to insult Britain..? Friendly fire would qualify me to insult yours but I don't stoop that low.

Click here for the reply.

What , don't you have the balls to type a reply..?

[Stalfos]

Geert Wilders and Michael Savage..? 2 men qualify you to insult Britain..? Friendly fire would qualify me to insult yours but I don't stoop that low.

Click here for the reply.

What , don't you have the balls to type a reply..?

That IS the reply I have written, you have reposted your post in multiple threads.

[The Chairman]

Geert Wilders and Michael Savage..? 2 men qualify you to insult Britain..? Friendly fire would qualify me to insult yours but I don't stoop that low.

Click here for the reply.

What , don't you have the balls to type a reply..?

That IS the reply I have written, you have reposted your post in multiple threads.

A dictatorship..? Jacqui Smith MP is a dictator is she..? She must be the first female dictator in history....idiot.

[Stalfos]

• • For the record, in the "Better start teaching the Koran to your kids!" thread it is established that you are an authoritarian.
  • why should I answer or respond to whatever you, an authoritarian, says? Why should you be taken serious if you don't accept opposing views?
• "Lenin, Hitler, Zedong and Sung quotes" thread:

  A dictatorship..? Jacqui Smith MP is a dictator is she..? She must be the first female dictator in history....idiot.

  What do you call someone who is able to take away the freedom of speech from others? In other words, what do you call someone who has the power to dictate what others can and cannot say?

• The UK is a disgusting country with disgusting laws. It's a dictatorship run (literally) by retards. No individual rights, no freedoms.

  Have you ever been to the United Kingdom...?

  
  How does that relate to the argument? I have asked that question many times and have you dodged and dodged answering this question time after time.
  I don't understand why you need to know details about me for a discussion that is not about me. I have a right to my privacy.

Based on the above and considering that you have only dodged and dodged my questions and asked only new questions, I'm NOT going to reply anymore to your posts (unless I choose to do so) unless you answer all of the above mentioned questions.

You are an authoritarian, debating with you is therefore not possible.