Why do girls laugh when a guy get hit in the test

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues

Moderator: Silent One

Tomas
 

Why do girls laugh when a guy get hit in the testicles ?

Postby Tomas on Fri Nov 26, 2004 10:37 pm

Recently I was playing a sport when I was hit in the balls, naturally I fell down holding my balls, when I sort of recovered I watched a few girls laughing at my pain in the testicles I know that girls go no have balls, but must they always laugh when a guy gets hurt in the testicles. Why? ???

Terr 1
 

because

Postby Terr 1 on Fri Nov 26, 2004 10:46 pm

Because a guys balls or testicles is the great equalizer of the sexes. You guys have great strength, but one slight punch, or even a slight tap or fllick to the testicles, grab or squeeze gives us females the advantage. So why not laugh, have fun, at the male weakness that you guys have in having hanging balls. Our breasts might bounce, hang, but there is no weakness to our breast in comparrison to having testicles. Nature naturally made us female the superior sex, so live with it guys. When will all men bow down to the natural advantage of the female. We live longer have better orgasims, when we have them. So come on guys admit that the female not the male is the superior sex..

Girl_Interrupted
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:01 pm

Postby Girl_Interrupted on Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:19 pm

Haha! I love that explaination. Its probably true. I mean why we do. Its all in a point of view for who is superior. Science would never state it.

bumlife
 

obviously you've never played sports yourself ms. "supe

Postby bumlife on Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:39 pm

actually, kicking a girl in the crotch will have the exact same effect as kicking a guy there. its a matter of nerve endings, not balls. thats why girls who play sports like hockey still have to wear cups.

bumlife
 

for the dude

Postby bumlife on Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:41 pm

i almost forgot buddy. i would laugh if i saw you getting hit in the balls too. its hilarious.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:21 am

This is an easy one. If most girls/women laugh (I don't actually know if this is true), then most girls/women are sadists. Since the only kind of superiority that is worth having (in my view) is moral superiority, this does not bode well for the case for girls/women.

Guest
 

Re: because

Postby Guest on Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:23 am

Terr 1 wrote:Because a guys balls or testicles is the great equalizer of the sexes. You guys have great strength, but one slight punch, or even a slight tap or fllick to the testicles, grab or squeeze gives us females the advantage. So why not laugh, have fun, at the male weakness that you guys have in having hanging balls. Our breasts might bounce, hang, but there is no weakness to our breast in comparrison to having testicles. Nature naturally made us female the superior sex, so live with it guys. When will all men bow down to the natural advantage of the female. We live longer have better orgasims, when we have them. So come on guys admit that the female not the male is the superior sex..


Consider history to be one long experiment. Which gender has (experimentally) proven themselves to be "dominant" most of the time. Come on, you can do it. Which one?

Guest
 

Re: because

Postby Guest on Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:44 am

Terr 1 wrote:Because a guys balls or testicles is the great equalizer of the sexes. You guys have great strength, but one slight punch, or even a slight tap or fllick to the testicles, grab or squeeze gives us females the advantage. So why not laugh, have fun, at the male weakness that you guys have in having hanging balls. Our breasts might bounce, hang, but there is no weakness to our breast in comparrison to having testicles. Nature naturally made us female the superior sex, so live with it guys. When will all men bow down to the natural advantage of the female. We live longer have better orgasims, when we have them. So come on guys admit that the female not the male is the superior sex..


It's time for you to get an education, and I'm going to give it to you. While I can do nothing about the moral depravity of your sadism, all of the so-called superior traits of women that you cite could easily be turned around.

Moral strength? When people have to risk their lives to save others, who does this more, men or women? (The Titanic is a good example.)

Longevity? If we are to be reduced to mere biological beings, whose biological purpose is to reproduce (or so the biologists tell us), which gender has a longer REPRODUCTIVE "lifetime"?

Intelligence? Throughout the entire history of humankind, which gender has produced more works of genius (in all disciplines, from art to philosophy to science to everything else)?

Genetic Superiority? Which gender has more genes "available" (for good or bad)? (Keep in mind that ALL of the genes on the X chromosome are contained in the male population, but NONE of the genes in the Y chromosome are contained in the female population). The answer, of course is that approximately 100 genes on the Y chromosome are available to the male population (but not to the genetically-deprived female population).

The point of this post is not that males are superior to females (or vice versa). Otherwise I would be guilty of the same low moral standards that you hold near and dear. Instead, the real point of this post is simply that all of these IDIOTIC arguments are driven solely by the morally UGLY aspects of humanity, such as bigotry, hatred, self-importance and other aspects of selfishness, tribalism, etc.

Love and Kisses-----Rowdy

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:00 pm

Intelligence? Throughout the entire history of humankind, which gender has produced more works of genius (in all disciplines, from art to philosophy to science to everything else)?



I pretty much feel this thread is going on a tangent....The thread is infantile anyway...As a woman i think its pathetic to that others would laugh at anyone being kicked where ever that may be.

As for the latter post, it seems rather ridiculous to state various occurances which belong in the past...Everyone is aware that women were repressed in past decades from fulling a career let alone vote..So to use subjects of science etc as way of subtly informing us that men are the more intelligent...You could easily take this further and go into other depths of human kind such as cultures and ethinticity etc.

you stated that ' The point of this post is not that males are superior to females ' then why did you proceed to list the various points you made? It seems rather illogical..

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:26 pm

. wrote:
Intelligence? Throughout the entire history of humankind, which gender has produced more works of genius (in all disciplines, from art to philosophy to science to everything else)?




As for the latter post, it seems rather ridiculous to state various occurances which belong in the past...Everyone is aware that women were repressed in past decades from fulling a career let alone vote..So to use subjects of science etc as way of subtly informing us that men are the more intelligent...You could easily take this further and go into other depths of human kind such as cultures and ethinticity etc.

you stated that ' The point of this post is not that males are superior to females ' then why did you proceed to list the various points you made? It seems rather illogical..


Indeed. Perhaps I should have placed the words "could easily be turned around" in BOLD in order to emphasize that the arguments that follow are not to be taken seriously, but are simply the converse of the IDIOTIC female superiority arguments that have emerged with such frequency on this board lately. Curiously, pehaps I missed it, but I don't recall reading your objections to those arguments?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:41 pm

You have assumed wrongly that i have read there petty arguments anyway :roll:

PurDuCoeur
 

For the REAL question at hand

Postby PurDuCoeur on Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:54 am

First and foremost, in this day in age there is no REAL "superior" sex anymore. Fact is we will not survive without EITHER of them. Males have their strong point as well as weaknesses. So do females, but what’s the point of pointing them out when there are ALWAYS exceptions to the rules and stereotypes. I don't know, just sees to be a waste of thinking.....

ANYWAYS, in reply to the FIRST question:

It's a matter of humiliation, of someone ELSE getting hurt. Why did people laugh when they watched the Three Stooges? Because, that’s just what we found funny. Now in cases like these (and trust me I’ve had my fair share from football, hockey and male and female friends who liked to play “jokes”) it’s just a type of pain girls may never feel so to them it’s funny. I’m not saying they can’t feel things similar like child birth, but that’s a little more complex and if I were to ever hear of someone laughing while some woman gave birth I might have to set him straight :evil: ….In short…(sort of :? )…it’s just that funny to see a MACHO MAN fall to his knees because some little girl nailed him in the nuts…it’s just that simple

User avatar
PurDuCoeur
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:56 am
Location: SoCal

...

Postby PurDuCoeur on Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:09 am

If there are any dissagreement, please let me know and I help yea find the truth :wink:


Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests