Moderator: Silent One
The Colonel wrote:katyshaw wrote:. wrote:Katyshaw wrote:Katy wrote:I started this thread and forgot to report that I did have Emma's ears pierced at four months after all. There were no problems and she looks so sweet wearing the little gold studs that I am really pleased I made this decision for her. I am expecting my second child in September and if I have another daughter she will definitely have her ears pierced while still a baby too. I am sorry that not everyone agrees with the decision of moms like me to start our girls off with earrings at a young age but I thoroughly recommend it on the basis of my experience.
Just to let you know that I did have another daughter ( Anna) - born on Setember 11th. Yesterday my partner and I took her to have her ears pierced and she looks so sweet wearing her little gold studs. She hardly cried at all - it was so quick and easy. Her older sister, Emma, still wears earrings all the time. As a parent of two little girls I think it is good ideapiercing girls' ears when they are babies - so much easier to do it now rather than wait until they are older and likely to fiddle with them more - and they really do look lovely.
OH LOOK, JULIE H IS BACK UNDER ANOTHER STUPID USER NAME...AS IF ANYONE BELIEVES THESE STUPID STORYS...ALEX170170 WE KNOW THIS IS YOU.
I was rather upset to read that someone thinks I have made up the posts on this board - I really am a real person ! I am 25 years old with two daughters, Emmma born on 15th March 2005 and Anna born on 11th September, 2007. No Alex, I would not consider having either of my daughter's ears double pierced when they are young. That is a decision each of them can make when they are older if they want to.
When did ALEX ask that?
It was a guest that asked that.
Now why would you think it was Alex? That is puzzling.![]()
Maybe because you wrote the guest post and the above?
I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt until I saw that.
The Colonel wrote:The Colonel wrote:katyshaw wrote:. wrote:Katyshaw wrote:Katy wrote:I started this thread and forgot to report that I did have Emma's ears pierced at four months after all. There were no problems and she looks so sweet wearing the little gold studs that I am really pleased I made this decision for her. I am expecting my second child in September and if I have another daughter she will definitely have her ears pierced while still a baby too. I am sorry that not everyone agrees with the decision of moms like me to start our girls off with earrings at a young age but I thoroughly recommend it on the basis of my experience.
Just to let you know that I did have another daughter ( Anna) - born on Setember 11th. Yesterday my partner and I took her to have her ears pierced and she looks so sweet wearing her little gold studs. She hardly cried at all - it was so quick and easy. Her older sister, Emma, still wears earrings all the time. As a parent of two little girls I think it is good ideapiercing girls' ears when they are babies - so much easier to do it now rather than wait until they are older and likely to fiddle with them more - and they really do look lovely.
OH LOOK, JULIE H IS BACK UNDER ANOTHER STUPID USER NAME...AS IF ANYONE BELIEVES THESE STUPID STORYS...ALEX170170 WE KNOW THIS IS YOU.
I was rather upset to read that someone thinks I have made up the posts on this board - I really am a real person ! I am 25 years old with two daughters, Emmma born on 15th March 2005 and Anna born on 11th September, 2007. No Alex, I would not consider having either of my daughter's ears double pierced when they are young. That is a decision each of them can make when they are older if they want to.
When did ALEX ask that?
It was a guest that asked that.
Now why would you think it was Alex? That is puzzling.![]()
Maybe because you wrote the guest post and the above?
I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt until I saw that.
If you are who you say KatyShaw - why can't you answer the above?
. wrote:The Colonel wrote:The Colonel wrote:katyshaw wrote:. wrote:Katyshaw wrote:Katy wrote:I started this thread and forgot to report that I did have Emma's ears pierced at four months after all. There were no problems and she looks so sweet wearing the little gold studs that I am really pleased I made this decision for her. I am expecting my second child in September and if I have another daughter she will definitely have her ears pierced while still a baby too. I am sorry that not everyone agrees with the decision of moms like me to start our girls off with earrings at a young age but I thoroughly recommend it on the basis of my experience.
Just to let you know that I did have another daughter ( Anna) - born on Setember 11th. Yesterday my partner and I took her to have her ears pierced and she looks so sweet wearing her little gold studs. She hardly cried at all - it was so quick and easy. Her older sister, Emma, still wears earrings all the time. As a parent of two little girls I think it is good ideapiercing girls' ears when they are babies - so much easier to do it now rather than wait until they are older and likely to fiddle with them more - and they really do look lovely.
OH LOOK, JULIE H IS BACK UNDER ANOTHER STUPID USER NAME...AS IF ANYONE BELIEVES THESE STUPID STORYS...ALEX170170 WE KNOW THIS IS YOU.
I was rather upset to read that someone thinks I have made up the posts on this board - I really am a real person ! I am 25 years old with two daughters, Emmma born on 15th March 2005 and Anna born on 11th September, 2007. No Alex, I would not consider having either of my daughter's ears double pierced when they are young. That is a decision each of them can make when they are older if they want to.
When did ALEX ask that?
It was a guest that asked that.
Now why would you think it was Alex? That is puzzling.![]()
Maybe because you wrote the guest post and the above?
I was prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt until I saw that.
If you are who you say KatyShaw - why can't you answer the above?
julie h and alex170170 is the same person, along with katyshaw...katy shaw claims shes not going to post again, but we all know she / he will make up a new user name with more dumb stories that are getting really easy to pick up after a few reads...
Jenna3 wrote:If Mom has pierced ears then daughter will want pierced ears at some point because most little girls want to be just like Mommy. I pierced my daughters ears at age three (same age that my mother pierced my ears) then again at age five because she "wanted more earrings like Mommy" (my ears were double pierced at the time). Since then at age sixteen I pierced her ears a third time (again at her request) and she gave me my third lobe piercings. For most little girls it is not a question of "should I" but a question of "when".
Jenna3 wrote:If Mom has pierced ears then daughter will want pierced ears at some point because most little girls want to be just like Mommy. I pierced my daughters ears at age three (same age that my mother pierced my ears) then again at age five because she "wanted more earrings like Mommy" (my ears were double pierced at the time). Since then at age sixteen I pierced her ears a third time (again at her request) and she gave me my third lobe piercings. For most little girls it is not a question of "should I" but a question of "when".
The Colonel wrote:Jenna3 wrote:If Mom has pierced ears then daughter will want pierced ears at some point because most little girls want to be just like Mommy. I pierced my daughters ears at age three (same age that my mother pierced my ears) then again at age five because she "wanted more earrings like Mommy" (my ears were double pierced at the time). Since then at age sixteen I pierced her ears a third time (again at her request) and she gave me my third lobe piercings. For most little girls it is not a question of "should I" but a question of "when".
That is not true.
My son eldest sons have a pierced ear - but I do not.
uri wrote:Colonel, I think you're wrong - there's a difference between boys and girls piercing ears. for boys it's a fashion, for girls it's the norm. Most moms have it - most dads don't. so it's not just the individual mother. And there's age too - a girl of three is like to want to look like mom, a girl or boy of 13 is more likely to want something different - belly button might be the choice.
But it doesn't matter why a girl (or boy) of three wants her/his ears pierced - the point is would you allow it. I wouldn't (but my ex didn't ask me back then). Not that's such a big deal. I'm Jewish after all, what we Jews do to week-old baby boys is much more comlex, dangerous, in a more sensitive place - and much more painful.
uri wrote:Colonel, I think you're wrong - there's a difference between boys and girls piercing ears. for boys it's a fashion, for girls it's the norm. Most moms have it - most dads don't. so it's not just the individual mother. And there's age too - a girl of three is like to want to look like mom, a girl or boy of 13 is more likely to want something different - belly button might be the choice.
.
Polgara69 wrote:uri wrote:Colonel, I think you're wrong - there's a difference between boys and girls piercing ears. for boys it's a fashion, for girls it's the norm. Most moms have it - most dads don't. so it's not just the individual mother. And there's age too - a girl of three is like to want to look like mom, a girl or boy of 13 is more likely to want something different - belly button might be the choice.
.
I disagree here. I had my ears peirced when I was 7 and had a quite a few problems. Possibly cos I didnt look after them properly. Cant remember cos it was a long time ago! But I stopped wearing them when I was about 21. Daughter never saw me wearing them but she had hers done when she was 9. (I didnt want her to, her Dad took her. He wanted to from when she was a baby but I wouldnt let him). She wore them for about 3 months and then took them out and never wore them again. My stepdaughter has just about everything peirced you can imagine! (She is 20 now!) But she didnt get a taste for it from me!
I agree with whoever said in the first page of this thread (sorry cant remember!) who said kids wearing jewellery look like pikey kids. They do. I see them a lot where I live (council estate) little girls with scraped back hair (which has to hurt and give them a headache by the end of the day) and covered in jewellery. Its more of a fashion statement for their chav mothers than anything else. Ooh look how much stolen jewellery my child has! Urgh.
I know I am gonna get some backlash for that one but in a lot of cases it is true. When your daughter can answer the question, " Do you want your ears peirced?" then you can discuss it with her.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests