Still in nappies.

[The Colonel]

WHO IS THE COLONEL ?HAS HE EVER BEEN TO WAR ?AND HOW DOES HE HAVE SO MUCH TIME ON THIS SITE ?I THIK HE IS A SADO.

I have retired from the army.

I am working most of the day on a computer running my business, that is why I check in here quite often. I also sold my property business in January that I jointly owned with my wife.

I'm a very happy man, but you are a troll.

As G&P says "Log in you gutless coward".

[The Colonel]

so go away!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The idiot can't even get an insult correct.

[G Nap]

This is pointless, and still it goes on?

[Rebman]

You have already stated that you knew it was Thot Gor who was the fake mum who said that she had a seven-year-old son called Mohammed. Therefore you already knew that the bit about a seven-year-old son was a lie, yet you went ahead and posted it.

I thought he was seven years old. I don't think Thot picked that age from nowhere. Notice I did not call him "Mohammed" since I know that is likely not to be correct. This proves me correct here.

The real McMum stated on a number of occasions that her son was a teenager (it is all in the thread), but you chose to take the word of someone who you admitted to knowing was a fake McMum. It also proves The that you didn’t even bother to read what the real McMum had to say before lying about her. It certainly does not prove you correct here.

What proof do you have that the real McMum is an AB/DL?

Why would an ordinary mum, interested in her kid's innocent wetting problem, be constantly discussing the colour of her child's nappies? I've had 4 kids with a 5th on the way - I don't give a damn what colour they are as long as they do the job. She gave a pathetic reply which I'm sure you'll support!

The real McMum posted at length about the nature of her son’s condition, but you weren’t interested in reading it (it is all in the thread). Not once did McMum discuss the colour of her son’s nappies. As she stated that he wore terry nappies and even mentioned a supplier of larger size nappies, they were almost certainly white. If you were the age you claim to be (50), you would know that waterproof plastic pants are needed to be worn over terry nappies, and that traditionally these were produced in semi-transparent white. When one of the other mothers pointed out that these days Suprima plastic pants could be obtained in darker opaque colours, McMum asked about these as her teenage son understandably felt very self conscious about wearing plastic pants that were effectively see-thru. Everyone on that thread seemed to comprehend this apart from you, so when a fake McMum post appeared in an AB/DL thread stating that either terry nappies OR coloured Suprima pants could be worn, there were no prizes for guessing who the prime suspect for being the fake McMum was.

There was nothing in McMum’s posts that indicated that she was an AB/DL, but there was something in some of the fake posts that indicated that the probable fake McMum was the Colonel, because only he thought that Suprima pants were a type of nappy (it’s all in the thread).

A diaper lover would be interested in coloured nappies. An ordinary parent, like myself, would not be.

As McMum showed no indication that she was interested in coloured nappies (see above) this would put her in the same category as you claim to be, i.e. an ordinary parent.

What proof do you have that the real McMum has Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy?

Sodium Penothol diagnosed her with that. Get your facts correct. The reasoning for that diagnosis - he discussed himself in the thread. Refer to that for an explanation.

You are not seriously telling me that you would go to Sodium Pentothol (who you don’t even know, or perhaps you do) on the Internet for a medical diagnosis, are you? SP’s reasoning for his amateurish diagnosis was that he had read that some sufferers of MSbP claimed that their child was disabled. You then jumped at this as proof that McMum had MSbP, because she had stated that her son had a disability, and started to announce it as proven fact (it’s all in the thread). Some murderers in the past have been Lieutenant Colonels, but does that automatically mean that ALL Lieutenant Colonels are murderers? By your logic you must be a proven murderer Colonel.

What proof do you have that the real McMum forced her son into nappies?

A mother more interested in the colour of her son's nappies than in his problem?

As McMum was not more interested in the colour of her son’s nappies than in his medical condition (see above), this does not apply (it’s all in the thread).

A mother who actually insulted her own son, by calling me (after producing a fake website with someone else by the name of The Colonel, and trying to pass that off as me - I notice you don't mention that!) something along the lines of (from memory) a deviant nappy wearer with a wetting problem. (Something close to that, it is all in the thread.)

Yes, unfortunately for you it is all in the thread. McMum did not produce a fake website. She posted a URL linking to a REAL website in which someone calling himself “The Colonel” (coincidence or what?) admitted to having had a wetting problem up until the age of twelve. Nowhere was the word ‘deviant’ mentioned. McMum merely postulated that this could possibly provide an explanation for your apparent presence in, and obsession with, nappy threads, as your many hundreds of posts had easily outnumbered those of most of the participating mums put together (it’s all in the thread).

As I pointed out at the time, it insults her son as a deviant person. I also commented her statement made as much sense as me calling my (now) 16 year old "a queer". You just don't do it! Not a mother!

Because of your obsession with nappy threads, another member or guest called you ‘Colonel Nappy’. As you had been a perpetual pest/troll since first posting in the thread, McMum adopted this name for you, but nowhere was the word ‘deviant’ used. Get your facts straight (it’s all in the thread).

What proof do you have that the real McMum was arrested?

Haven't seen her around for a long time, have you?

So whenever you haven’t seen someone around for a long time, do you automatically assume that they have been arrested, and then state categorically that this is so on a public forum? You are either an idiot or a pathological liar. I have given you the benefit of the doubt and assumed the latter.

In fact in McMum’s last post on this thread she stated that she would only return if and when she had anything relevant to say. As you effectively destroyed this thread (which you had previously boasted was your intention), McMum probably realised that the occasion for saying anything else of relevance would probably never arise (it’s all in the thread). She has probably gone elsewhere to post because of morons like you, or just not bothered.

What proof do you have that the real McMum’s son was taken into care?

I don't believe she had a son, for the reason I listed above. No mother would say that about a child. It was a fantasy of hers.

If you believed that McMum didn’t even have a son, then your insistence that she forced her ‘non-existent’ son into nappies and that he was taken into care is clearly a fantasy of yours and a lie. There is no other explanation. Just because you live in a world of pure fantasy, it does not mean that all other people do.

I want answers to ALL of these questions, otherwise one can only conclude that you are a pathological liar, who is guilty of gross libel. Blaming others, e.g. Sodium Pentothol, Myron, Lena, etc. will not wash, as you were the one who was responsible for the above quote.

Quotes can be tongue in cheek.

What you refer to as “tongue in cheek”, most ordinary sane people would refer to as downright lies. It is perfectly clear to any NORMAL person that you set out to convince the posters in the Adult Baby Fetish thread that McMum was a thoroughly despicable AB/DL with MSbP, who had been arrested and her son (who you now say didn’t exist) was put into care. In your case, the term pathological liar fits better than for any other person I have ever come across. Don’t you realise that you tell so many lies that if and when you genuinely do ‘cry wolf’, no one is going to believe you. I pity you, as like most people who are habitual liars you are probably very insecure.

So what it boils down to is that you haven’t been able to present one iota of real evidence against McMum, and what you do have has been pure malicious invention and distortion. In a court case you would be laughed out of court with such evidence and almost certainly fined for wasting the court’s time, and possibly even charged with perjury.

Perhaps you can’t help being a lying bas***d if you really are (as you claim) a direct descendent of William the Conqueror, otherwise known to history as ‘William the b*****’.

[The Colonel]

It wasn't just me that came to the conclusion that she was an AB/DL. There were two others - Thot and Sodium Penothol.

I'm not sure, but I think even the likes of Jin and Lena posted what a weirdo she was. I know I once asked Jin for her opinion on the thread.

Justice has been done.

This case has long been closed, and as the member above you stated "why is this still going on?"

So, F*** off McMum!

[Rebman]

It wasn't just me that came to the conclusion that she was an AB/DL. There were two others - Thot and Sodium Penothol.

You accused McMum of having a nappy fetish long before either Thot Gor or Sodium Pentothol appeared on the scene, and then as soon as Sodium Pentothol turned up you lied by claiming that McMum had admitted to wearing nappies (it’s all in the thread), so don’t blame them. You didn’t produce any viable evidence, and neither did either of those rat bags, assuming of course that they were not Colonel aliases. I do seem to recall reading in the thread that Sodium Pentothol kept UK hours despite claiming to be living in the USA, and that he was always on hand to back you up when you needed him, how convenient (it’s all in the thread).

I very much doubt whether Sodium Pentothol was Myron, as you claim. On the 14th February you accused a guest who posted “Sooz rules” of being Myron. Now Sodium Pentothol would hardly have posted that, after all the things he said about Sooz, would he? Perhaps we should ask Myron if he has ever posted as guest Sodium Pentothol.

I'm not sure, but I think even the likes of Jin and Lena posted what a weirdo she was. I know I once asked Jin for her opinion on the thread.

As far as I can ascertain, Jin has never posted in this thread, and the first time that Lena posted here was last Thursday. Did you by chance tell Lena your lying version of the McMum story and ask her to post here in reply to me? Thwere is certainly no evidence that she has read this thread.

Justice has been done.

This case has long been closed, and as the member above you stated "why is this still going on?"

Cases are never closed until the guilty have been found, charged and convicted. Are you afraid that the evidence is building up and pointing in your direction? You certainly should be.

So, F*** off McMum!

Good heavens, I appear to be McMum again. You really don’t have a clue even after I have given you one on a plate, do you? Does McMum haunt you in your nightmares? It would appear so; by the way you keep going on about her long after she has disappeared from this forum. Fortunately for you, she seems to have “f***ed” off, as you put it, months ago, although as I don’t know her, I could be wrong.

When guilty parties fear that the law may be closing in on them, one of the first things they always do is to destroy any possibly incriminating evidence, e.g. drug dealers try to flush their cache of class A drugs down the toilet before the police break in. This is a sure sign that they have something to hide. When you stated that Jin and Lena had posted here, saying what a weirdo McMum was, I was fairly sure that you were lying as usual, but I am always thorough in my investigations, so I checked back through the thread again. What did I find? After giving his most pathetic reply yet to my direct questions asking for proof of his allegations, the Colonel spent the early hours of Monday morning frantically deleting many of his previous posts in this thread of a few months back. Unfortunately for the Colonel his deletion activities are all recorded in the thread and can be identified as posts of his with no messages, but with text such as:-

[Repealed by The Colonel]

Last edited by The Colonel on Mon May 26, 2008 1:00 am; edited 1 time in total

in its place. This is a clear case of setting out to destroy any possible incriminating evidence, a sure sign that he has something to hide. An innocent person would not be deleting a dozen or more of his old posts at 2 o’clock in the morning (1.00am GMT), without a reason. Why? Could it be because I kept saying “it’s all in the thread”, and the Colonel was worried that other members (e.g. Lena) might be curious and take a look through the thread (as I suggested), only to discover that what the Colonel had told her about McMum was a pack of lies? Remember, the evidence for this early-hours activity is all there in the thread. I have taken a look through a number of other threads, and I have yet to find one where a member has deleted so many of his or her previous posts in one session.

So what this all amounts to is that the Colonel hasn’t got a scrap of evidence that McMum is an AB/DL with MSbP, who forces her son to wear a nappy, and has been arrested and her son taken into care. His whole case is a tissue of lies and fabrication. I leave it to members and guests to decide what sort of person that makes the Colonel.

[Swee is a bitch]

Swee still wears nappies.

[The Colonel]

Sodium Penothol cannot have been me since we were often posting at the same time. It's all in the thread!

As for Jin and Lena, they did visit here. I said I wasn't sure if they had posted, but you may contact them and ask them if you wish.

As for the deletions, I am deleted quite a lot of my older posts now, not simply in this thread, simply to make searching for bits and pieces a whole lot easier. I am not the only one who does this.

It seems to me, you are an AB/DL. No-one else would be interested.

And yes, I call you McMum, and I shall continue to. But rest assured - I know exactly who you are. Your writing style and choice of words gives it away really easy!

Now F*** off McMum.

[Rebman]

Sodium Penothol cannot have been me since we were often posting at the same time. It's all in the thread!

The means by which you could easily post as The Colonel and Sodium Pentothol within a space of a minute was explained. It’s all in the thread.

I note that you are still trying to divert attention away from the fact that you have no proof (or viable evidence) for your allegations. If you had, you would have come up with it long before now. So you really are a vile liar, aren’t you?

As for Jin and Lena, they did visit here. I said I wasn't sure if they had posted, but you may contact them and ask them if you wish.

What reason would they have for visiting here, if it wasn’t following your invite to check on your posting record as was the case for me? I invited Lena to check through the whole of the thread, but I notice that she has not come back to confirm that she has done so.

As for the deletions, I am deleted quite a lot of my older posts now, not simply in this thread, simply to make searching for bits and pieces a whole lot easier. I am not the only one who does this.

That excuse is feeble even for you. The timing is far too much of a coincidence, and for obsolete posts, you seem to have been very selective in the ones that you deleted. The only plausible explanation is that you had something to hide.

It seems to me, you are an AB/DL. No-one else would be interested.

It seems that very few other people are interested in justice around here, otherwise you would not have been allowed to get away with your lying, fabrication and vindictive slandering for so long. By your own logic, you must be an AB/DL, as you were by far the most prolific poster on this and other ‘nappy’ threads, and “no-one else would be interested”, to use your own words. Why did you come here in the first place?

And yes, I call you McMum, and I shall continue to. But rest assured - I know exactly who you are. Your writing style and choice of words gives it away really easy!

What is it like being wrong all the time? I suppose it fits in well with being an admitted liar. I know that you are lying, because I am Rebman and I have never posted under any other name or as a guest. I am surprised that you haven’t checked with admin as you normally claim to do.

You seem to waste much of your life claiming that one member or guest is another member or guest. Your strike rate isn’t very impressive judging by how often you change your mind. Still, keep it up, I find it amusing, and as I am none of the people you know on the FF forums, I am 100% assured that you will always be wrong. LOL

Now F*** off McMum.

By the way, I have much more staying power than McMum appears to have had, so for your own sanity perhaps you should “F*** off”. Sorry I forgot, you never had any sanity in the first place did you:-

You didn’t actually think I was sane did you?

It seems that in your panic you forgot to delete that one; too late now.

Perhaps in all future posts I should refer to you as ‘Colonel Nappy Thread’. Most fitting, don’t you think? After all, you must be the uncrowned ‘King of the Nappy Threads’, and it fits in well with your ‘royal’ aspirations and delusions of grandeur. LOL

[Guest]

^ Cum on his face

[The Colonel]

Rebman = McMum

[The Colonel]

^ Cum on his face

+1

[The Colonel]

Rebman = McMum

[Rebman]

Is that the best you can come up with Colonel Nappy Thread?

You have failed to come up with even a shred of proof/evidence for your allegations, so you resort to calling me someone who I am not. At least my name for you describes exactly who you are, but you still don’t have a clue who I am. LOL.

I challenged a guest here once, on a seemingly innocent thread. Her name was McMum - she is infamous here. She was an AB/DL and was FORCING her son into nappies and claiming he needed them (he was seven). She had Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, and has since been arrested and the child taken into care.

Do I take it that you still have no proof for any of this? Are we to assume that it is a complete pack of lies? Are you this forum’s worst liar Colonel Nappy Thread?

Why did you come to this Thread in the first place? Are you an in-the-closet AB/DL, Colonel Nappy Thread?

[The Colonel]

Is that the best you can come up with Colonel Nappy Thread?

You have failed to come up with even a shred of proof/evidence for your allegations, so you resort to calling me someone who I am not. At least my name for you describes exactly who you are, but you still don’t have a clue who I am. LOL.

I challenged a guest here once, on a seemingly innocent thread. Her name was McMum - she is infamous here. She was an AB/DL and was FORCING her son into nappies and claiming he needed them (he was seven). She had Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, and has since been arrested and the child taken into care.

Do I take it that you still have no proof for any of this? Are we to assume that it is a complete pack of lies? Are you this forum’s worst liar Colonel Nappy Thread?

Why did you come to this Thread in the first place? Are you an in-the-closet AB/DL, Colonel Nappy Thread?

The bitch is back people.