Still in nappies.

[Guest]

The Colon.

[Rebman]

Is that the best you can come up with Colonel Nappy Thread?

You have failed to come up with even a shred of proof/evidence for your allegations, so you resort to calling me someone who I am not. At least my name for you describes exactly who you are, but you still don’t have a clue who I am. LOL.

I challenged a guest here once, on a seemingly innocent thread. Her name was McMum - she is infamous here. She was an AB/DL and was FORCING her son into nappies and claiming he needed them (he was seven). She had Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, and has since been arrested and the child taken into care.

Do I take it that you still have no proof for any of this? Are we to assume that it is a complete pack of lies? Are you this forum’s worst liar Colonel Nappy Thread?

Why did you come to this Thread in the first place? Are you an in-the-closet AB/DL, Colonel Nappy Thread?

The bitch is back people.

Are you so incredibly stupid that you think that members and guests on this thread cannot read? You wrote:-

And yes, I call you McMum, and I shall continue to. But rest assured - I know exactly who you are.

Having said that, you still assume that people will believe you when you say that I am McMum. How sad!

You have been given every opportunity to produce your evidence against McMum, but you have failed to do so. You are so predictable; when you are losing an argument, your standard defence is to accuse someone of being someone else. The question won’t go away though. Your credibility rating must be zero by now Colonel Nappy Thread.

[The Colonel]

Is that the best you can come up with Colonel Nappy Thread?

You have failed to come up with even a shred of proof/evidence for your allegations, so you resort to calling me someone who I am not. At least my name for you describes exactly who you are, but you still don’t have a clue who I am. LOL.

I challenged a guest here once, on a seemingly innocent thread. Her name was McMum - she is infamous here. She was an AB/DL and was FORCING her son into nappies and claiming he needed them (he was seven). She had Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, and has since been arrested and the child taken into care.

Do I take it that you still have no proof for any of this? Are we to assume that it is a complete pack of lies? Are you this forum’s worst liar Colonel Nappy Thread?

Why did you come to this Thread in the first place? Are you an in-the-closet AB/DL, Colonel Nappy Thread?

The bitch is back people.

Are you so incredibly stupid that you think that members and guests on this thread cannot read? You wrote:-

And yes, I call you McMum, and I shall continue to. But rest assured - I know exactly who you are.

Having said that, you still assume that people will believe you when you say that I am McMum. How sad!

You have been given every opportunity to produce your evidence against McMum, but you have failed to do so. You are so predictable; when you are losing an argument, your standard defence is to accuse someone of being someone else. The question won’t go away though. Your credibility rating must be zero by now Colonel Nappy Thread.

The scum of the Earth speaks.

McMum = Rebman

[Guest]

The Colon needs a Colonoscopy.

[Baby Brad]

Don't freak out ladies, I am 37, wet most nights and also wear (cloth and plastic pants) nappies to bed

[Rebman]

The scum of the Earth speaks.

At long last you realise that you are the “scum of the Earth”. I couldn’t agree more.

I challenged a guest here once, on a seemingly innocent thread. Her name was McMum - she is infamous here. She was an AB/DL and was FORCING her son into nappies and claiming he needed them (he was seven). She had Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, and has since been arrested and the child taken into care.

Still no evidence, Colonel Nappy Thread? I have allowed you extra time in this exam because I know that you are mentally retarded, but I will have to say: “put your pencil down” soon.

[Guest]

mcmum owns the colon

[The Colonel]

The scum of the Earth speaks.

At long last you realise that you are the “scum of the Earth”. I couldn’t agree more.

I challenged a guest here once, on a seemingly innocent thread. Her name was McMum - she is infamous here. She was an AB/DL and was FORCING her son into nappies and claiming he needed them (he was seven). She had Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, and has since been arrested and the child taken into care.

Still no evidence, Colonel Nappy Thread? I have allowed you extra time in this exam because I know that you are mentally retarded, but I will have to say: “put your pencil down” soon.

The troll posts against me are most revealing of your identity.

Could do better.

As for the name calling McMum - by saying "Colonel Nappy Thread" is merely confirming who you are.

You are so funny. I have had many good laughs about you.

[Rebman]

The troll posts against me are most revealing of your identity.

Could do better.

Your defence mechanism refuses to let you accept that the ‘so called troll posts’ from guests are indeed from guests and not from McMum or from me. The ‘colon’ posts have been going on for quite a long time now, but you stubbornly refuse to accept that many posters on this (and other threads) find you to be a vindictive liar.

I see that you are still heading the poll for the most annoying member. Just face up to it.

As for the name calling McMum - by saying "Colonel Nappy Thread" is merely confirming who you are.

It would appear that McMum followed the lead of another poster and referred to you as ‘Colonel Nappy’ or ‘Colonel Nappy Boy’. I can understand why she did it, but I have never called you that, as a much more suitable name is ‘Colonel Nappy Thread’. Even you cannot deny that you were by far the most prolific poster in the “Still in Nappies” thread, so the title is most appropriate.

You are so funny. I have had many good laughs about you.

I don’t know what you have to laugh about, as you still haven’t satisfactorily answered any of my questions yet. All you have succeeded in doing is contradict yourself, thus confirming your lies.

A reminder:-

What proof do you have that the real McMum is an AB/DL?

What proof do you have that the real McMum has Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy?

What proof do you have that the real McMum forced her son into nappies?

What proof do you have that the real McMum was arrested?

What proof do you have that the real McMum’s son was taken into care?

Why did you originally come to this thread?

[Guest]

McMum

[The Colonel]

The troll posts against me are most revealing of your identity.

Could do better.

Your defence mechanism refuses to let you accept that the ‘so called troll posts’ from guests are indeed from guests and not from McMum or from me. The ‘colon’ posts have been going on for quite a long time now, but you stubbornly refuse to accept that many posters on this (and other threads) find you to be a vindictive liar.

I see that you are still heading the poll for the most annoying member. Just face up to it.

As for the name calling McMum - by saying "Colonel Nappy Thread" is merely confirming who you are.

It would appear that McMum followed the lead of another poster and referred to you as ‘Colonel Nappy’ or ‘Colonel Nappy Boy’. I can understand why she did it, but I have never called you that, as a much more suitable name is ‘Colonel Nappy Thread’. Even you cannot deny that you were by far the most prolific poster in the “Still in Nappies” thread, so the title is most appropriate.

You are so funny. I have had many good laughs about you.

I don’t know what you have to laugh about, as you still haven’t satisfactorily answered any of my questions yet. All you have succeeded in doing is contradict yourself, thus confirming your lies.

A reminder:-

What proof do you have that the real McMum is an AB/DL?

What proof do you have that the real McMum has Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy?

What proof do you have that the real McMum forced her son into nappies?

What proof do you have that the real McMum was arrested?

What proof do you have that the real McMum’s son was taken into care?

Why did you originally come to this thread?

While I may have been OTT with McMum, I am right about her. Your failure to see that is disappointing.

If this was an on going thread, I'd reply in great detail. Since this thread died long ago - there is no point whatsoever. Think what you like. Frankly, I don't care.

Why not visit some of the other threads I've written in, and then critique me? You won't because on the vast majority you won't find anything to refute or challenge me on.

The only exceptions are this one, and my military thread.

With the case of the latter, even when evidence is provided - nobody listens. So I ask you - what, exactly, is the point?!

[Guest]

McMum owns the Colon

[The Colonel]

McMum owns the Colon

You are funnier than your own S***.

[Rebman]

While I may have been OTT with McMum, I am right about her. Your failure to see that is disappointing.

If you are right about McMum, where is your viable evidence? I have given you plenty of opportunities to state it, but you have failed to do so. How can my failure to see something that isn’t there be disappointing? What is disappointing is that you have no evidence, yet you insist that you are right.

Why not visit some of the other threads I've written in, and then critique me? You won't because on the vast majority you won't find anything to refute or challenge me on.

I have visited some of your other threads, and have found you to be rude and insulting to people on many of them, especially on the religion threads. On these, the first thing that you did was to insult others’ religious beliefs, when you could have just stated that you personally do not believe in such things. You set out to be confrontational. You have made unsupportable claims, such as “Most priests are paedophiles”.

Although, in threads concerning homosexuality, you have quite reasonably argued against the bigotry of people such as Fred, you have spoilt it by including obvious errors in your references to HIV percentages. Either that or you have no understanding of percentages.

The only exceptions are this one, and my military thread.

With the case of the latter, even when evidence is provided - nobody listens. So I ask you - what, exactly, is the point?!

When your statements contradict official MOD listings, who are we expected to believe? When you state that Britain has over 1800 combat aircraft, you are venturing into an area in which I have lifelong professional experience, so I know full well that you are talking nonsense.

So yet again I have to ask the question; are we ever going to see any real evidence against McMum? Also, what was your motive in coming to this thread in the first place?

[Guest]

McMum